Development of Efficacy-Enhanced Heart Failure Rehabilitation Patient Education Materials for Health Behavior Change

References

• Adams K, AC G, JM C, eds. Institute of Medicine (US) committee on the crossing the quality chasm: next steps toward a new health care system. The 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit: A Focus on Communities; Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2004. PMID: 25009886.
   Google Scholar
• Kato N, Kinugawa K, Nakayama E, et al. Insufficient self-care is an independent risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with heart failure. Int Heart J. 2013;54(6):382–389. doi:10.1536/ihj.54.382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. Self-Management Support for People with Long-Term Conditions. 2nd ed. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Katch H. The role of self-efficacy in cardiovascular disease self-management: a review of effective programs. Patient Intell. 2010;2010:33–44. doi:10.2147/pi.s12624.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):248–287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. doi:10.2196/jmir.1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What is health literacy? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html. Updated February 2, 2022. Accessed January 13, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Reza N, DeFilippis EM, Jessup M. Secondary impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(5):5. doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.120.007219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromage DI, Cannatà A, Rind IA, et al. The impact of Covid‐19 on heart failure hospitalization and management: report from a heart failure unit in London during the peak of the pandemic. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(6):978–984. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvedar J, Heinzelmann PJ, Jacques G. Cancer diagnosis and telemedicine: a case study from Cambodia. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:viii37–viii42. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyde M, Peters R. Education material for heart failure patients: what works and what does not? Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014;11(3):314–320. doi:10.1007/s11897-014-0200-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyde M, Tuckett A, Peters R, Thompson DR, Turner C, Stewart S. Learning style and learning needs of heart failure patients (the NEED2KNOW-HF patient study). Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;8(5):316–322. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyaswami V, Padmanabhan D, Patel M, et al. A readability analysis of online cardiovascular disease-related health education materials. Health Lit Res Pract 2019;3(2):e75–e80. doi:10.3928/24748307-20190306-03.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang PM, van Ballegooie C. Assessment of the readability and quality of online patient education material for chronic medical conditions. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(2):234. doi:10.3390/healthcare10020234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapoor K, George P, Evans MC, Miller WJ, Liu SS. Health literacy: readability of ACC/AHA online patient education material. Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36–40. doi:10.1159/000475881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability assessment of online patient education material on congestive heart failure. Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:1–8. doi:10.1155/2017/9780317.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KS, Cho YM, Oh SH, Jung MS, Yoon JY. Evaluation of the heart failure in internet patient information: descriptive survey study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1047. doi:10.3390/ijerph18031047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney MK, Santiago G, Perni S, et al. Readability of patient education materials from high-impact medical journals: a 20-year analysis. J Patient Exp. 2021;8:237437352199884. doi:10.1177/2374373521998847.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó P, É B, Kósa K. Readability and comprehension of printed patient education materials. Front Public Health. 2021;9:725840. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitkov-Norris ED, Yeghiazarian A. Validation of VARK learning modalities questionnaire using Rasch analysis. J Phys Conf Ser. 2015;588:012048. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/588/1/012048.
   Google Scholar
• Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y. Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: learning styles inventory with multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educ Psychol Meas. 2009;70(2):323–339. doi:10.1177/0013164409344507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395–403. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnevetsky J, Walters CB, Tan KS. Interrater reliability of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(3):490–496. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwadry-Sridhar F, Guyatt GH, Arnold JMO, et al. Instruments to measure acceptability of information and acquisition of knowledge in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5(6):783–791. doi:10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00158-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32(3):221–233. doi:10.1037/h0057532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredenburg K, Mao JY, Pw S, Carey T. A survey of user-centered design practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 2002: 471–478; Chicago, Illinois. doi:10.1145/503376.503460.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14. doi:10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts M, Corno L. Self-Regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention. Appl Psychol. 2005;54(2):199–231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley H. Promoting self‐efficacy in patients with chronic disease beyond traditional education: a literature review. Nurs Open. 2019;7(1):30–41. doi:10.1002/nop2.382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):173–190. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Zuniga J. Effectiveness of using picture-based health education for people with low health literacy: an integrative review. Cogent Med. 2016;3(1):1264679. doi:10.1080/2331205x.2016.1264679.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald L. Publishing U of ML. 2.1 Persuasion: aristotle’s rhetorical elements. caul-cbuapressbookspub. https://caul-cbua.pressbooks.pub/businesscommunication/chapter/2-1-persuasion-aristotles-rhetorical-elements/. Published August 16, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AJ J, SP H. Choice Theory and Reality Therapy (CTRT) group counseling module. Asian J Humanit Social Stud. 2015;3(4):313–318.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home. 1st ed. NJ: Jossey-Bass; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Begeny JC, Greene DJ. Can readability formulas be used to successfully gauge difficulty of reading materials? Psychol Sch. 2013;51(2):198–215. doi:10.1002/pits.21740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klare GR. A second look at the validity of readability formulas. J Read Behav. 1976;8(2):129–152. doi:10.1080/10862967609547171.
   Google Scholar
• Marnell G. Measuring readability. Part 1: the spirit is willing but the Flesch is weak. South Commun. 2008;15:17–21. https://www.abelard.com.au/readability%20statistics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Redish J. Readability formulas have even more limitations than Klare discusses. ACM J Comput Doc. 2000;24(3):132–137. doi:10.1145/344599.344637.
   Google Scholar
• Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;70(4):351–379. doi:10.1177/1077558712465774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima MA, Duque A, Rodrigues Junior LF, Lima VC, Trotte LA, Guimaraes TC. Health literacy and quality of life in hospitalized heart failure patients: a cross-sectional study. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020: 10(4): 490–498. eCollection
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack L, Athilingam P, Adorno-Nieves J. Health literacy impacts knowledge and the use of education app in heart failure: a pilot study. Cardiol Vasc Res. 2021;5(5). doi:10.33425/2639-8486.1124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis R, Campbell R, Hildon Z, Hobbs L, Michie S. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;9(3):323–344. doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.941722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission for Health Education Credentialing. Health Education Responsibilities. https://www.nchec.org/health-education-responsibilities. Published 2020. Accessed January 15, 2023.
   Google Scholar