More E-Government, Less Street-Level Bureaucracy? On Legitimacy and the Human Side of Public Administration

REFERENCES

• Åström, J. (2001). Should democracy online be quick, strong or thin? Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 49–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, J. (2004). Mot en digital demokrati? Teknik, politik och institutionell förändring. Örebro, Sweden: Örebro Studies in Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Houndmills, UK: MacMillan Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2005). E-government as an information ecology: Backgrounds and concepts. In V. Bekkers & V. Homburg ( Eds.), The information ecology of e-government: E-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration ( pp. 1–20). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007). The myths of e-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society, 23, 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, I. (2013). E-government and e-governance—Swedish case studies with focus on the local level. Licentiate thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Political Science and Politics, 35, 679–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government, People and Process, 6(1), 78–91.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (1989). Kommunal information på biblioteken i Botkyrka.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (1994). Servicestugornas utveckling, 20.09.1994.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2000). Projektet Medborgarkontoren som kommunens demokraticentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2002). Bilaga protokoll kommunstyrelsen §98 IT-strategi, 26.06.2002. Dnr 02.187.adbit.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2003). Elektroniska servicetjänster—Etapp 1: Inventering och kartläggning, 16.06.2003.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2007). E-strategi för Botkyrka kommun, 19.01.2007.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2008a). Förstudie rollbaserad portal, Rapport. 26.01.2008.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2008b). Botkyrkas första steg mot en kommunportal, 03.12.2008.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2009). Yttrande över betänkande “Styr Samverkan—för bättre service till medborgarna (SOU 2008:97),” samt beskrivning av pågående arbete, 18.02.2009.
   Google Scholar
• Botkyrka Municipality. (2011). “ Botkyrka i siffror och statistik.” Retrieved October 5, 2012, from: http://www.botkyrka.se/kommunochpolitik/ombotkyrka/kommunfakta/botkyrkaisiffrorstatistik.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62, 174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A., & McNutt, J. G. (2011). Virtual government–citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative? Administration & Society, 42, 836–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2010). Civil servants’ perceptions regarding ICT use in Norwegian central government. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cordella, A. (2007). E-government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology, 22, 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 86–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 16, 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2008). Rethinking government-public relationships in a digital world: Customer, clients, or citizens? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(1), 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flensburg, P., Grunden, K. Bernhard, I., & Nåfors, A. (2009). Kartläggning av kundcenter, Botkyrka kommun. Retrieved from http://www.klippan.se/download/18.fa87f091429e7917001469/1386852747397/Kartl%C3%A4ggning+av+kundcenter+-+Sammanfattning+f%C3%B6r+samtliga+tre.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawthrop, L. C. (1998). The human side of public administration. PS: Political Science and Politics, 31(4), 763–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S., & Weibull, L. (2012) Förtroendet för staten. In SOM Institute ( Ed.), I framtidens skugga: fyrtiotvå kapitel om politik, medier och samhälle: SOM-undersökningen 2011 ( pp. 127–144). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborgs universitet, SOM-institutet.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, V., & Bekkers, V. (2005). E-government and NPM: A perfect marriage? In V. Bekkers & V. Homburg ( Eds.), The information ecology of e-government ( pp. 155–170). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85, 279–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, G. (2011). Local values and e-government—continuity and change in public administration. Licentiate thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2012). Understanding divergent patterns of political discussion in online forums—evidence from the European citizens’ consultations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(1), 64–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, L. (2007). Democratic accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips, M. B., Taylor, J. A., & Organ, J. (2009). Identity management, administrative sorting and citizenship in new modes of government. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 715–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, U. (2007). E-government services in local government—a study of development in Swedish municipalities. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 4, 157–176.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, L. (1998). Demokratins väktare. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2007). Why don’t they listen to us? Reasserting the role of ICT in public administration. Information Polity, 12, 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montin, S. (2007). Moderna kommuner. Malmö, Sweden: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Post and Telecom Authority (PTS). (2013). Bredbandskartan. Retrieved March 19, 2013, from: http://bredbandskartan.pts.se.
   Google Scholar
• Öhrling PriceWaterHouseCoopers. (2002). Granskning av medborgarkontoren i Botkyrka kommun, Report, October.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, C.G. (2004). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to the servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22, 38–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2007). Creating state legitimacy—The five basic models. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2010). Nycklarna till politisk legitimitet. In S. Andersson, G. Erlingsson, A. Berg, & M. Sjölin ( Eds.), Korruption, maktmissbruk och legitimitet. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21, 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Skiftenes, F. L. (2008). The shape of eparticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 400–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Self, P. (1999). Rolling back the market. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• SKOP. (2010). Rapport till Botkyrka kommun, November-December 2010. Retrieved from http://www.botkyrka.se/SiteCollectionDocuments/Kommun%20och%20politik/Medborgarunders%C3%B6kning,%20november-december%202010%20rapport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden (SCB). (2011). Befolkning efter bakgrund. Retrieved October 5, 2012, from: http://www.scb.se/Statistik/BE/BE0101/2010A01L/Utrikes_fodda.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54, 364–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Agency for Public Management. (2000). 24-timmarsmyndighet: Förslag till kriterier för statlig elektronisk förvaltning i medborgarnas tjänst, 2000:21. Retrieved from http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publikationer/Arkiv/2000/200021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR). (1997). Samtjänst vid medborgarkontor, 26.08. 1997. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR). (2005). Kommunkompassen—Analys av Botkyrka kommun, Rapport 08.11. 2005. Stockholm, Sweden: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR). (2008). E-förvaltningsutveckling i Sveriges kommuner 2006-2007, Delrapport 2. Stockholm, Sweden: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Lips, A. (2008). The citizen in the information polity: Exposing the limits of the e-government paradigm. Information Polity, 13, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 33, 354–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). (2012). E-government survey 2012: E-government for the people. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Viborg Andersen, K., Grönlund, Å., Moe, C., & Sein, M. (2005). Introduction to the special issue: E-government in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, K. (2010). Yes we can: How online viewership, blog discussion, campaign statements, and mainstream media coverage produced a viral video phenomenon. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, N. E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar