Is Web 2.0 Providing a Voice for Outsiders? A Comparison of Personal Web Site and Social Media Use by Candidates at the 2010 UK General Election

REFERENCES

• Arrington, M. (2010). Facebook COO: 175 million people log into Facebook every day. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/01/facebook-coo-sheryl-sandberg-world-economic-forum-davos/
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, C., & Raab. C. (1999). Wiring-up the deck-chairs? Parliamentary Affairs, 52(3), 518–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, T., & Strandberg, K. (2008). Riding the Web 2.0 wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish national elections. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 5(2), 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Copsey, N. (2003). The extreme right and the Internet. In R. Gibson, P. Nixon, & S. Ward (Eds.), Political parties and the Internet: Net gain? (pp. 218–233). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, A., & Firestone, C. (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, D. (2000). Adoption of the World Wide Web by American political candidates, 1996–1998. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 556–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Electoral Commission. (2010). UK general elections—Candidate election spending. Retrieved September 2010 from http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/find-information-by-subject/elections-and-referendums/past-elections-and-referendums/uk-general-elections/candidate-election-spending
   Google Scholar
• Francoli, M., & Ward, S. (2008). 21st century soapboxes? MPs and their blogs. Information Polity, 13(1/2), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2008). Nationalizing and normalizing the local? A comparative analysis of online candidate campaigning in Australia and Britain. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 4, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & McAllister, I. (2011). A net gain? The electoral benefits of Web 2.0 campaigning in the Australian 2010 federal election. Paper presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 1–4, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Römmele, A. (2006). “Down Periscope”: The search for high-tech campaigning at the local level in the 2002 German Federal Election. Journal of e-Government, 2, 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (1999). Party democracy on-line: UK parties and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 2(3), 340–367.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (2000). An outsider’s medium? The European elections and UK party competition on the Internet. British Elections and Parties Review, 10(1), 173–191.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, J., & LaPointe, M (2004). Cyber-campaigning grows up: A comparative content analysis of websites for US senate and gubernatorial races, 1998–2000. In R. Gibson, A. Römmele, & S. Ward (Eds.), E-democracy: Mobilisation, organisation and participation online (pp. 116–132). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harfoush, R. (2009). Yes we did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, T. (2010, January 2). How the 2010 election will be won by blogs and tweets. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/jan/03/labour-tory-internet-campaigns
   Google Scholar
• Herrnson, P., Stokes-Brows, A., & Hindman, M. (2007). Campaign politics and the digital divide: Constituency characteristics, strategic considerations and candidate Internet use in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 60(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalnes, Øyvind. (2009). Norwegian parties and Web 2.0. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3–4), 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kelner, P. (2013). How UKIP voters compare. Retrieved from http://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/03/05/analysis-ukip-voters/
   Google Scholar
• Kerbel, M. (2009). Netroots: Online progressives and the transformation of American politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Levenshus, A. (2010). Online relationship management in a presidential campaign: A case study of the Obama campaign’s management of its Internet-integrated grassroots effort. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(3), 313–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N., & Vedel, T. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusoli, W. (2005). The Internet and the European Parliament elections: Theoretical perspectives, empirical investigations and proposals for research. Information Polity, 10(3), 153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Wolfe, J. (1999). Party competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(4), 24–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, M. (2010). The 2010 general election and new media. Retrieved from http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2010/01/20/the-2010-general-election-and-new-media/
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2010). May 6th 2010 British general election constituency results release 5.0. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/pippanorris3/research/data
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2010). Census 2001 report for parliamentary constituencies. Retrieved September 2010 from http://data.gov.uk/dataset/census_2001_report_for_parliamentary_constituencies
   Google Scholar
• Rackaway, C. (2007).Trickle-down technology? The use of computing and network technology in state legislative campaigns. Social Science Computer Review, 25(4), 466–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (2010). Constituency Database. Published January 2010. Retrieved from http://election.pressassociation.com/constituencies.html
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E. (2011). Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in 2011. European Journal of Communication, 26(9), 310–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selnow, G. (1998). Electronic whistle-stops: The impact of the Internet on American politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K. (2009). Online campaigning: An opening for the outsiders? An analysis of Finnish parliamentary candidates’ websites in the 2003 election campaign. New Media Society, 11(5), 835–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudulich, L., & Wall, M. (2009). Keeping up with the Murphys? Candidate cybercampaigning in the 2007 Irish general election. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(3), 456–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaine, J. (2010, April 6). General election 2010: Facebook and Twitter to have unprecedented impact. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7558703/General-election-2010-Facebook-and-Twitter-to-have-unprecedented-impact.html
   Google Scholar
• Tweetminster (2013). MPs on Twitter 2013. Retrieved September 2013 from http://tweetminster.co.uk/mps
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2013). A tale of two e-parties: Candidate websites in the 2008 U.S. presidential primaries. Party Politics, 19, 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedel, T, & Michalska, K. (2009). The Internet and French political communication in the aftermath of the 2007 presidential election. Paper presented at the 5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. (2005). The Internet and 2005 election: Virtually irrelevant? In A. Geddes & J. Tonge (Eds.), The nation decides: The 2005 general election (pp. 188–206). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S., & Gibson, R. (1998). The first Internet election? UK political parties and campaigning in cyberspace. In Crewe, I; Gosschalk, B; Bartle, J (Eds) Political communications: Why Labour won the general election of 1997 (pp. 93–112). London, UK: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S., & Gibson, R. (2003). On‐line and on message? Candidate websites in the 2001 general election. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 5(2), 188–205.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Gulati, G. (2007). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 midterm elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Wintour, P. (2010, March 31). Internet will be giant force in election campaign, says Lord Gould. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/01/general-election-2010-labour
   Google Scholar
• YouGov. (2010). Eve-of-election predictions. Retrieved from http://yougov.co.uk/news/2010/05/06/eve-election-predictions/
   Google Scholar
• Zittel, T. (2009). Lost in technology? Political parties and the online campaigns of constituency candidates in Germany’s mixed member electoral system. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3-4), 298–311.
   Google Scholar