Quantifying Partisan Selective Exposure Through Network Text Analysis of Elite Political Blog Networks During the U.S. 2012 Presidential Election

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Ackland, R. (2005). Mapping the US political blogosphere: Are conservative bloggers more prominent? Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/45827/3/polblogs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery (pp. 36–43). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 65–74). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumer, E. P. S., Sueyoshi, M., & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Bloggers and readers blogging together: Collaborative cocreation of political blogs. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 20(1–2), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Campus, D. (2012). Political discussion, opinion leadership and trust. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, K., & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carren, N., & Gaby, S. (2011). Occupy online: Facebook and the spread of Occupy Wall Street. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1943168#
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M. D., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science, 1:6. doi:10.1140/epjds6
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillman & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure in communication (pp. 11–13). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A. (1982). A network-based content analysis methodology for computer-mediated communication: An illustration with a computer bulletin board. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 904–925). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. (1993). Network analysis of message content. In G. Barnett & W. Richards (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences XII (pp. 197–222). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A. (2008). Short-term and long-term effects of a public relations campaign on semantic networks of newspaper content: Priming or framing?. Public Relations Review 34, 288–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A. (2010). Inferences from word networks in messages. In K. Krippendorff & M. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 421–430). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A. (2012). Social network size and designers’ semantic networks for collaboration. International Journal of Organization Design and Engineering 2(4), 343–361.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A., & Cepela, N. (2010). Automatic mapping of social networks of actors from text corpora: Time series analysis. In N. Memon, J. Jie Xu, D. Hicks, and Chen, H. (Eds.), Data mining for social network data. Annals of information science, 12 (pp. 31–46). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A., Duran, M. V., Diaz, A. C., & Jimenez, J. L. T. (2011). Semantic networks for corporate communication concepts and crisis: Differences based on corporate reputation. Observatorio (OBS*), 6(2), 127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Danowski, J. A., & Lind, R. (2001). A computer content analysis linking gender language in presidential candidates’ news to gender gaps in polls. In M. West (Ed.), Applications of computer content analysis (pp. 157–167). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M., Sagae, K., Sachdeva, S., & Gratch, J. (2014). Analyzing political rhetoric in conservative and liberal weblogs related to the construction of the “Ground Zero mosque.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. (2007). Media work. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diesner, J., & Carley, K. M. (2005). Revealing social structure from texts: Meta-matrix text analysis as a novel method for network text analysis. In V. K. Narayanan & D. J. Armstrong (Eds.), Causal mapping for information systems and technology research (pp. 81–108). Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diesner, J., & Carley, K. M. (2011). Semantic networks. In G. Barnett (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social networks (Vol. 2, pp. 766–769). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic network analysis as a method for visual text analytics. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79(6), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Drezner, D. (2008). The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134, 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In L. Berkowitz ( Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–97). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41–80.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009a). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009b). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zuniga, H., Puig-Abril, E., & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the Internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11(4), 553–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J. (2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., & Groshek, M. C. 2013. Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time. Media and Communication, 1(1), 15–27. doi:10.12924/mac2013.01010015
   Google Scholar
• Hamby, P. (2013). Did twitter kill the boys on the bus? Searching for a better way to cover a campaign. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Discussion Paper Series. Retrieved from http://shorensteincenter.org/2013/08/d80-hamby/
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., & Kane, M. (2008). Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 67–86. doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrove, T., Miller, J., Stempel, C., & Stempel, G. H., III. (2009). Web media important players in spread of knowledge of political issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, W., Albarracin, D., Eagly, A., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M.J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrigan, J., Garrett, K., & Resnick, P. (2004). The Internet and the democratic debate. Retrieved from Pew Internet and American Life Project Web site: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2004/The-Internet-and-Democratic-Debate.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2004) (pp. 168–177). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., Bichard, S. L., & Zhang, W. (2009). Communication communities or “cyberghettos?” A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 60–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., & Kaye, B. (2004). Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(3), 622–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., & Kaye, B. (2009). In blogs we trust: Deciphering credibility of components of the Internet among politically interested Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., & Kaye, B. (2013). The dark side of the boon? Credibility, selective exposure, and the proliferation of online sources of political information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1862–1871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B. K., Bichard, S. L., & Wong, W. J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested Internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 100–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2011). Hot diggity blog: A cluster analysis examining motivations and other factors for why people judge different types of blogs as credible. Mass Communication and Society, 14(2), 236–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Johnson, J. T. (2012). Political blog readers: Predictors of motivations for accessing political blogs. Telematics & Informatics, 29(1), 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 628–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E., Sides, J., & Farrell, H. (2010). Self segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazersfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in a modern society (pp. 18–66). New York, NY: Van Norstrand.
   Google Scholar
• Leccese, M. (2009). Online information sources of political blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 578–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraz, S. (2011a). The fight for “how to think”: Traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation. Journalism: Theory, Practice, and Criticism, 12(1), 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Meraz, S. (2011b). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. International Journal of Press and Politics, 18(2), 138–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, M., & DiStaso, M. W. (2008). The source cycle. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, M., & Garrison, B. (2011). Study shows some blogs affect traditional news media agendas. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(3), 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popping, R. (2003). Knowledge graphs and network text analysis. Social Science Information, 42(1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard, B. (2012, November 4). Undecided voters hold the key—If they ever make up their minds. National Journal. Retrieved from http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/undecided-voters-hold-the-key-if-they-ever-make-up-their-minds-20121104
   Google Scholar
• Rojecki, A., & Meraz, S. (in press). Rumors and FIBs: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814535724.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., & Brossard, D. (2003). Pathways to political participation? Religion, communication contexts, and mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(3), 300–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (2013). The new rules of marketing & PR: How to use social media, online video, mobile applications, blogs, news releases, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 194–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, A., & Benkler, Y. (2012). A tale of two blogospheres: Discursive practices on the left and right. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 459–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2011). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media & Society, 14(2), 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2011). The Internet and the 2011 campaign. Retrieved from Pew Internet and American Life Project Web site: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/The-Internet-and-Campaign-2010.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users’ perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00215.x
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, K. (2007a). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567–587.
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, K. (2007b). Political blogs: Transmission belts, soapboxes, mobilizers, or conversation starters? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(3), 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. (2012). Connect your Wordpress blog with Twitter, Facebook and Tumblr. Retrieved from Mashable Web site: http://mashable.com/2012/11/08/wordpress-jetpack-2-0/
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D., & Peretti, J. (2007, May). Viral marketing for the real world. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2007/05/viral-marketing-for-the-real-world/ar/1
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, S. M., Indurkhya, N., Zhang, T., & Damerau, F. J. (2005). Text mining: Predictive methods for analyzing unstructured information. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, R. H., Bradley, A., Blackburn, G., & Fields, T. (2011). Tracking the blogs: An evaluation of attacks, acclaims, and rebuttals presented on political blogs during the 2008 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, E., Feng, M., & Danowski, J. (2013). “Privacy” in semantic networks on Chinese social media: The case of Sina Weibo. Journal of Communication, 63(6), 1011–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar