Policy Considerations on Facebook: Agendas, Coherence, and Communication Patterns in the 2011 Danish Parliamentary Elections

REFERENCES

• Adams, J., Merrill, S., III, & Grofman, B. (2005). A unified theory of party competition: A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, P. R., Lewis, B. R., & Ingham, B. (1999). Exploring the positioning process in political campaigning. Journal of Communication Management, 3(4), 325–336. doi:10.1108/eb023496
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, G., & Marcella, R. (2012). Does Scotland “like” this? Social media use by political parties and candidates in Scotland during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Libri, 62, 109–124. doi:10.1515/libri-2012-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., Glantz, M. J., Phillips, A. L., Rill, L. A., Davis, C. B., Henson, J. R., & Sudbrock, L. A. (2011). Staying “on message”: Consistency in content of presidential primary campaign messages across media. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(4), 457–468. doi:10.1177/0002764211398072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., Lassen, D., Kim, Y. M., Shah, D., Franklin, E. F., Ridout, T. N., & Franz, M. (2011). Social and broadcast media in 2010 midterms: The expanding repertoire of senate candidates’ campaign strategies. Paper presented at the 2011 APSA meeting, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). Social media as beat. Tweets as news sources during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403–419. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
   Google Scholar
• Butler, P., & Collins, N. (1996). Strategic analysis in political markets. European Journal of Marketing, 30(10/11), 25–36. doi:10.1108/03090569610149773
   Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610. doi:10.1177/0002764213489014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010). Issue engagement on congressional candidate websites, 2002–2006. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/0894439309335485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20, 210–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvander Højholt, L., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2011). Forandrer Facebook partiernes forhold til vælgerne? [Does Facebook change parties’ relation to voters?]. Tidskrift Politik, 14(3), 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2011). Mapping parties’ issue agenda in different channels of campaign communication: A wild goose chase? Javnost—The Public, 18(1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/313183222.2011.11009050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C., & Mølgaard Svensson, H. (2014). Ebbs and flows of negative campaigning: A longitudinal study of the influence of contextual factors on Danish campaign rhetoric. European Journal of Communication, 29(2), 230–239. doi:10.1177/0267323113510274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C., & Schumacher, G. (2014). Én for alle og alle for én? Mønstre i og effekter af partiintern uenighed blandt folketingskandidaterne ved 2011-valget. [One for all and all for one? Patterns and effects of party internal disagreement among candidates for parliament in the Danish 2011 election]. Politica, 46(3), 296–322.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Moe, H. (2013). Introduction to special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 637–645. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.784795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2002). Online action in campaign 2000: An exploratory analysis of the U.S. political Web sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(2), 222–244. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power. The social media revolution in American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., Römmele, A., & Williamson, A. (2014). Introduction: Chasing the digital wave: International perspectives on the growth of online campaigning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 123–129. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.903064
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., & Ward, S. (2012). Political organizations and campaigning online. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 62–74). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giebler, H., & Wessels, B. (2013). Campaign foci in European parliamentary elections: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Political Marketing, 12(1), 53–76. doi:10.1080/15377857.2013.752230
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & Van’t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, W. J., Moon, B., & Grant, J. B. (2010). Digital dialogue? Australian politicians’ use of the social network tool twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579–604. doi:10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2007). The growing importance of issue competition. The changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies, 55(4), 608–628. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Bordacconi, J. M. (2013). Avisernes dagsorden i valgkampen 1998 til 2011. [The newspaper agenda in the 1998 to 2011 elections] (The Danish National Election Study, Working paper no. 3). Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (Eds.). (2014a). Folketingsvalgkampen 2011 i perspektiv [Parliamentary elections 2011 in perspective]. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF-forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2014b). Cyber-campaigning in Denmark: Application and effects of candidate campaigning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics., 11(2), 206–219. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.895476
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., Fury, D., & Lock, A. (2005). The evolution of a campaign: Tracking press coverage and party press releases through the 2001 UK general election. Journal of Public Affairs, 5, 99–111. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1479-1854
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. (2009). World wide webbed: The Obama campaign’s masterful use of the Internet. Social Europe Journal, 4, 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., & Klemmensen, R. (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 309–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., Elmelund-Præstekær, C., Albæk, E., Vliegenthart, R., & De Vreese, C. H. (2012). Party media agenda-setting: How parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics, 18(2), 173–191. doi:10.1177/1354068810380097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet World Stats. (2012). [Online]. Retrieved November 1, 2012, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86–105. doi:10.1080/13572334.2011.545181
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U. (2013). Mastering the art of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 717–736. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Surowiec, P., & Baranowski, P. (2014). Poland’s 2011 online election campaign: New tools, new professionalism, new ways to win votes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 186–205. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.899176
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluation, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196–210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2010). Twitter: The electoral connection? Social Science Computer Review. doi:10.1177/0894439310382749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. R. (2010). Facebook marketing: Designing your next marketing campaign. Indianapolis, IN: Que publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maarek, P. J. (2011). Campaign communication & political marketing. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann Andersen, K., & Medaglia, R. (2009). The use of Facebook in national election campaigns: Politics as usual? Electronic Participation, 5694, 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetko, H. A. (1999). On message; communicating the campaign. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, C. (Ed.). (2009). Politicking online: The transformation of election campaign communications. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plasser, F., & Plasser, G. (2002). Global political campaigning: A worldwide analysis of campaign professionals and their practices. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., & Van Dalen, A. (2013). Dodging the gatekeepers? Information,Communication & Society, 16(5), 737–756. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 264–285. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubager, R. (2012). The parliamentary election in Denmark, September 2011. Electoral Studies, 31(4), 861–864. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkin, T., Moriarty, C. M., & Hefner, V. (2007). Congressional candidates’ issue agendas on- and off-line. Press/Politics, 12(2), 63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society, 11(2), 197–216. doi:10.1080/15205430701590267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thesen, G. (2011). Attack and defend! Explaining party responses to news (PhD dissertation). Politica, Århus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2008). Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 303–318. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2012). New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. Journal of Political Marketing, 11(1–2), 95–119. doi:10.1080/15377857.2012.642748
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2009). The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcmc.2009.14.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, P. (2012). Twitter links between politicians and journalists. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 680–691. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.667272
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342. doi:10.1177/1354068810366016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power. A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993–2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. doi:10.1177/0010414006299098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56, 88–109. doi:10.1111/jcom.2006.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P., Trammell, K. D., Postelnicu, M., Landreville, K. D., & Martin, J. D. (2005). Blogging and hyperlinking: Use of the Web to enhance viability during the 2004 US campaign. Journalism Studies, 6(2), 177–186. doi:10.1080/14616700500057262
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M. A., & Foot, K. A. (2005). Politics as usual, or politics unusual? Position taking and dialogue on campaign websites in the 2002 U.S. elections. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 169–185. doi:10.1111/jcom.2005.55.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar