Political Deliberation on Facebook during Electoral Campaigns: Exploring the Relevance of Moderator’s Technical Role and Political Ideology

REFERENCES

• Ancu, M., & Cozma, R. (2009). MySpace politics: Uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 567–583. doi:10.1080/08838150903333064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., Wojcieszak, M., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effect? New Media and Society, 14(3), 363–383. doi:10.1177/1461444811413191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. W., Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2011). Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), The sourcebook for political communication research (pp. 323–345). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camaj, L., Hong, S. C., Lanosga, G., & Luo, Y. (2009, August). Political discourse on Facebook: A new public sphere? Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. L. (1999). Civility: Manners, morals, and the etiquette of democracy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., Hall, N., & Howell, M. (2002). Hearing voices: The experience of online public consultations and discussions in UK governance. London, England: Hansard Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2004). Net-public sphere research: Beyond the “first phase.” Javnost—The Public, 11(1), 27–43. doi:10.1080/13183222.2004.11008845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The Internet’s impact on the American political system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 7, 315–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2002). The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary: The role of the moderator in Internet discussions about public issues. Information Polity, 7(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J., Giurcanu, M., Bowers, K., & Neely, J. (2010). The writing on the wall: A content analysis of college students’ Facebook groups for the 2008 presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 653–675. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (2005). Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica, 40(3), 284–298. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2008). Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in non-political discussion forums. Javnost—The Public, 15(2), 17–36. doi:10.1080/13183222.2008.11008968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. S. (2010). What’s wife swap got to do with it? Talking politics. In F. De Cindio, A. Macintosh, & C. Peraboni (Eds.), From e-Participation to Online Deliberation. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Online Deliberation, OD2010. (pp. 101–116). Leeds, UK: University of Leeds. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1610.7688
   Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva, V. (2008). Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels of the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 288–300. doi:10.1177/0894439307305636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, J. B., & Dougall, E. (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811–824. doi:10.1177/107769900708400410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. (2008) Why does incivility matter when communicating disagreement? Examining the psychological process of antagonism in political discussion ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, D., & Kies, R. (2005). Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica, 40, 317–335. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L. (2003). Public spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or government-sponsored—A comparison. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(4), 349–374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2003.00093.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Q., & Rafaeli, S. (2000). Time to split, virtually: “Discourse architecture” and “Community building” create vibrant virtual publics. Electronic Markets, 10(4), 214–223. doi:10.1080/101967800750050326
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, I., Bend, J., & Stern, B. (2002). e-Participation in local government. London, England: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kingwell, M. (1995). A civil tongue: Justice, dialogue, and the politics of pluralism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morison, J., & Newman, D. R. (2001). On-line citizenship: Consultation and participation in new labour’s Britain and beyond. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 15(2), 171–194. doi:10.1080/13600860120070501
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, England: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. (2004). Unchat: Democratic solution for a wired world. In P. M. Shame (Ed.), Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet (pp. 21–34). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. doi:10.1177/1461444804041444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. A. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220. doi:10.1177/1461444808099577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. A. (2011). On convergent supersurfaces and public spheres online. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1/2), 9–17. doi:10.1504/IJEG.2011.041704
   Google Scholar
• Postelnicu, M., & Cozma, R. (2007, November). Online political campaigning on MySpace during the 2006 U.S. mid-term elections. Paper presented at the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 347–356. doi:10.1080/01449290110084683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., & Medina, R. (2010). Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential elections. Information Polity, 15(1/2), 11–31. doi:10.3233/IP-2010-0196
   Google Scholar
• Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
   Google Scholar
• Santana, A. D., & Camaj, L. (2013, August). Facebook as a campaign tool: A new dimension to agenda setting discourse. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. M. (1997). Expanding the public sphere through computer-mediated communication: Political discussion about abortion in a Usenet newsgroup. Retrieved from https://people.sunyit.edu/˜steve/main.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, K., & Lariscy, R. (2008). Candidates make good friends: An analysis of candidates’ uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 175–198. doi:10.1080/15531180802178687
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. New York, NY: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850–863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2008). Analysing online political discussions: Methodological considerations. Javnost—The Public, 15(2), 37–55. doi:10.1080/13183222.2008.11008969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, A. G. (1999). Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is online political discussion? In B. Hague & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the Information Age (pp. 154–178). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2008). The political impact of Facebook: Evidence from the 2006 midterm elections and 2008 nomination contest. Politics and Technology Review, 1, 11–21. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p280151_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2009, April). Facebook grows up: An empirical assessment of its role in the 2008 congressional elections. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E. (2010). “Don’t talk to me”: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12(4), 637–655. doi:10.1177/1461444809342775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, J., Limperos, A., & Oliver, M. (2010). The 2008 presidential election, 2.0: A content analysis of user-generated political Facebook groups. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 631–652. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2006). Government-run online discussion fora: Moderation, censorship and the shadow of control. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 8(4), 550–568. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00247.x
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2012). Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society, 14(2), 244–261. doi:10.1177/1461444811410679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & Street, J. (2007). Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums. New Media & Society, 9(5), 849–869. doi:10.1177/1461444807081230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar