Not every day is Election Day: a comparative analysis of eighteen election campaigns on Facebook

References

• Anderson, K. (July 1, 2009). Arianna Huffington: Obsessiveness is the greatest strength of online news. The Guardian Website. Retrieved December 18, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/media/pda/2009/jul/01/arianna-huffington-activate-conference
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Koedam, J., Kostelka, F., … Zilovic, M. (2015). 1999–2014 Chapel Hill expert survey trend file. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. A., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in US elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, S. (1982). The permanent campaign. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordignon, F., & Ceccarini, L. (2013). Five stars and a cricket. Beppe Grillo shakes Italian politics. South European Society and Politics, 18(4), 427–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein, J. (2013). Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates’ Facebook pages. Online Information Review, 37(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campus, D. (2013). Women Political Leaders and the Media. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, T., & Strandberg, K. (2008). Riding the Web 2.0 wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5(2), 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, F. G., & Mair, P. (1984). Left-right political scales: Some ‘Expert’ judgments. European Journal of Political Research, 12, 73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conaghan, C., & De La Torre, C. (2008). The permanent campaign of Rafael Correa: Making Ecuador’s plebiscitary presidency. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C. (2002). Features: The contemporary presidency: The permanence of the “permanent campaign”: George W. Bush’s public presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 753–764.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, T. (2012). Political Communication and the “Permanent Campaign”. In D. Taras & C. Waddell (ed.), How Canadians Communicate IV (pp. 129–148). Edmonton, AB: AU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2012). The Impact of Negative Campaigning on Citizens’ Actions and Attitudes. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 173–185). London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fryklund, B. (2013). Populism–Changes over Time and Space: A Comparative and Retrospective Analysis of Populist Parties in the Nordic Countries from 1965 to 2012. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (ed.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 267–276). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Garzia, D. (2014). Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Pedersen, R. T. (2014). Campaigns matter: How voters become knowledgeable and efficacious during election Campaigns. Political Communication, 31(2), 300–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (2000). Campaigning and governing: A conspectus. In N. Ornestein & T. Mann (ed.), The permanent campaign and its future (pp. 1–37). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R. (2008). Austria: The structure and Agency of Austrian Populism. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (ed.), Twenty-First Century Populism (pp. 67–83). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Doyle, D. (2007). The importance of ideas: An a priori critical juncture framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 883–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2000). Preparing to Govern in 2001: Lessons from the Clinton Presidency. In N. Ornstein & T. Mann (ed.), The permanent Campaign and its future (pp. 185–218). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R., & Skogerbø, E. (2015). Candidate campaigning in parliamentary systems: Individualized vs. localized campaigning. Party Politics, 21(3), 428–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, L. (2010). The Personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernell, S. (1986). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2010). Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2012). Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics, 18(6), 825–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, A. I. (2010). The politicization of private persona: Exceptional leaders or the new rule? The case of the United Kingdom and the Blair effect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), 60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2014). Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on Facebook. New Media & Society, 18(2), 274–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., & Kalsnes, B. (2014). ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2015). The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, E. J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N., & Vedel, T. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisi, M. (2013). The professionalization of campaigns in recent democracies: The Portuguese case. European Journal of Communication, 28, 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique, L. E. G. (2013). El populismo del siglo XXI. Política Exterior, 27(153), 84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. (2009). Going dirty: The art of negative campaigning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2005). Introduzione alla ricerca comparata. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parmeggiani, B. (2015). A relação entre representante e representados no Facebook: Um estudo de caso da fanpage de Dilma Rousseff. Contemporânea, 12(1), 78–90.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzotti, E. (2008). El retorno del pueblo: Populismo y nuevas democracias en América Latina. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (ed.). (2005). The presidentialization of politics: A comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. (2013, May). Studying Facebook via data extraction: The Netvizz application. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, (pp. 346–355). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M., & Wolfsfeld, G. (2015). Aristotelian rhetoric and Facebook success in Israel’s 2013 election campaign. Online Information Review, 39(2), 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. (2013). Intimate politics: Publicity, privacy and the personal lives of politicians in media saturated democracies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2009). Selective professionalisation of political campaigning: A test of the party-centred theory of professionalised campaigning in the context of the 2006 Swedish election. Political Studies, 57(1), 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. L., & Mancini, P. (1996). Politics, media, and modern democracy: An international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Tarchi, M. (2008). Italy: A country of many populisms. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (ed.), Twenty-first century populism (pp. 84–99). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. S., & Friedenberg, R. V. (2008). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2013a). From echo chamber to persuasive device? Rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns. New Media & Society, 15(1), 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2013b). Digital politics in Western Democracies: A comparative study. Maryland, USA: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., & De Swert, K. (2009). Politics in the news: Do campaigns matter? A comparison of political news during election periods and routine periods in Flanders (Belgium). Communications, 34, 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen, L. (2006). The personal, the political and the popular. A woman’s guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3), 287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Cunha, C. (2012). Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 15(1), 128–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011a). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011b). Is the voter only a tweet away? Microblogging during the 2009 European Parliament election campaign in the Netherlands. First Monday [Online], 16(8).
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Towards a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. M. (1993). Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1992. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2013). The threat from the populist left. Journal of Democracy, 24(3), 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar