Electronic vs. Paper Voter Guides and Citizen Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial

References

• American Council of Trustees and Alumni. (2016, April 21). A crisis in civic education. Report published online at. Retrieved from http://www.goacta.org/publications/a_crisis_in_civic_education
   Google Scholar
• Ballotpedia. (n.d.). Features of official voter guides, compared by state. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/Features_of_official_voter_guides, compared by state
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J. (2005). The perverse consequence of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research, 33(4), 471–491. doi:10.1177/1532673X04269419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyerlein, K., & Chaves, M. (2003). The political activities of religious congregations in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2), 229–246. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, C., Elmendorf, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2015). Experimental study of partisan endorsements and nonpartisan voter guides in local elections. Election Law Journal, 14(1), 2–23. doi:10.1089/elj.2013.0238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brien, P. (2002). Voter pamphlets: The next best step in election reform. Journal of Legislation, 28, 87–111.
   Google Scholar
• Cann, D. M., & Yates, J. (2016). These estimable courts: Understanding public perceptions of state judicial institutions and policy-making. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know and why it matters. The Communication Review, 4, 129–164. doi:10.1080/10714420009359466
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, Michael X., & Scott Keeter. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (2011, January 21). The economics of E-government services are far from simple. Government Technology. Accessed online at. Retrieved from http://www.govtech.com/budget-finance/The-Economics-of-E-Government-Services-Are-Far-From-Simple.html
   Google Scholar
• Esterling, K. M. (1999). Judicial accountability the right way: Official performance evaluations help the electorate as well as the bench. Judicature, 82(5), 206–215.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (1991). Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Bedolla, L., & Michelson, M. (2009). What do voters need to know? Testing the role of cognitive information in asian american voter mobilization. American Politics Research, 37(2), 254–274. doi:10.1177/1532673X08320844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Richards, R. C., & Knobloch, K. (2014). Vicarious deliberation: A case study of the oregon citizens’ initiative review and electoral deliberation. International Journal of Communication, 8, 62–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., & Green, D. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653–663. doi:10.2307/2585837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. D. (2014). Implicit bias in judicial performance evaluations: We must do better than this. Justice System Journal, 35(3), 301–324. doi:10.1080/0098261X.2013.873290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary. (2012). The politics of congressional elections. 8th edition. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Larcinese, V. (2007). Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election. Public Choice, 131, 387–411. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9122-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. (2016). Uninformed: why people seem to know so little about politics and what we can do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, R. (1989). Wapner v. rehnquist: No contest; TV judge vastly outpolls justices in test of public recognition. The Washington Post; June 23, Friday, Final Edition. First Section, Page A21, The Federal Page.
   Google Scholar
• Mummolo, J., & Peterson, E. (2017). How content preferences limit the reach of voting aids. American Politics Research, 45(2), 159–185. doi:10.1177/1532673X16674756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. 2016. California’s record-setting 224-page voter guide is costing taxpayers nearly $15 million. Los Angeles Times; September 9. Accessed online at Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-california-voter-guide-november-ballot-20160909-snap-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Niven, D. (2006). A field experiment on the effects of negative campaign mail on voter turnout in a municipal election. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 203–210. doi:10.1177/106591290605900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. (2001). Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. P., & Batrapu, R. K. (2010). Digital government. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 317–364. doi:10.1002/aris.2010.1440440115
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. (2016). Building the Superhighway for information and commerce: How the E-government can save money by building bridges across the digital divide. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 22(1), 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J., Mattes, K., Redlawsk, D. P., & Katz, S. (2019). “Reprehensible, Laughable: The Role of Contempt in negative Campaigning. American Politics Research. Online First version referenced at. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1532673X19857968
   Google Scholar
• Streb, M. J., & Frederick, B. (2009). Conditions for competition in low-information elections: The case of intermediate appellate courts. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 523–537. doi:10.1177/1065912908321698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, D. E., & McGlynn, A. J. (2010). The digital divide, political participation, and place. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 64–74. doi:10.1177/0894439309335148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., … Nyhan, B. 2018. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature Research Report published by the Hewlett Foundation online at https://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Social-Media-Political-Polarization-and-Political-Disinformation-Literature-Review.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Computer and internet use in the United States: 2010” Online report at. Retrieved from <http://www.census.gov/hhes/computer/publications/2010.html>
   Google Scholar