Facebook as “third space”: Triggers of political talk in news about nonpublic affairs

References

• Boczkowski, P. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2010). Is there a gap between the news choices of journalists and consumers? A relational and dynamic approach. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 420–440. doi:10.1177/1940161210374646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2017). Ethics guidelines for Internet-mediated research. INF206/04.2017. https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/ethics-guidelines-internet-mediated-research-2017
   Google Scholar
• CIEP. (2018). Informe de resultados de la encuesta de opinión sociopolítica realizada en enero de 2018. San José, Costa Rica: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezel, L. (1975). Narrative modalities. Journal of Literary Semantics, 5(1), 5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., & Tolson, A. (2017). Citizens talking politics in the news: Opinions, attitudes and (dis) engagement. In M. Ekström & J. Firmstone (Eds.), The mediated politics of Europe (pp. 201–227). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2013). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (2012). On media: Making sense of politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2012). Beyond “political” communicative spaces: Talking politics on the Wife Swap discussion forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(1), 31–45. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.635961
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2015). Everyday political talk in the Internet-based public sphere. In S. Coleman & D. Freelon (Eds.), Handbook of digital politics (pp. 247–263). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., & Hajru, A. (2011). Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere. European Journal of Communication,26(1), 18–32. doi:10.1177/0267323110394858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latinobarómetro. (2018). Informe 2018. Santiago, Chile: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., Inthorn, S., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2005). Citizens or consumers?: What the media tell us about political participation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Gallego, F. A., et al. (2019). Oriígenes y consolidaciӧn del sensacionalismo periodístico en Iberoamérica: Mé;xico, Argentina y Costa Rica. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Fragua.
   Google Scholar
• Pignataro, A., & Treminio, I. (2019). Reto económico, valores y religión en las elecciones nacionales de Costa Rica 2018. Revista de Ciencia Política, 39(2), 239–264. doi:10.4067/S0718-090X2019000200239
   Google Scholar
• Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British Broadsheet newspapers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-García, C. (2008). The media in Costa Rica: Many media, scarce communication. In J. Lugo-Ocando (Ed.), The media in Latin America (pp. 100–115). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations (Fourth ed.). London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, V., & Bangdiwala, S. I. (2014). Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures. BMC Medical Research Methodology,14(1), 100–109. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siles, I., Campos, P., & Segura, A. (2018). Sitios costarricenses de noticias en Facebook: ¿Qué “likean”, comentan y comparten sus usuarios? Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 160(II), 37–55. doi:10.15517/rcs.v0i160.34806.
   Google Scholar
• Siles, I., Carazo, C. & Tristán-Jiménez, L. (2020). El “matrimonio gay” como tema electoral en Costa Rica: Eventos mediáticos en sistemas hií;bridos de comunicacioӧn. In SilesI. (Ed.) Democracia en digital: Facebook, comunicación y política en Costa Rica (pp. 207–232). San José: CICOM.
   Google Scholar
• Tristán-Jiménez, L., Álvarez, M. & Siles, I. (2020). Entre “brechas” y “cuotas” informativas: Tendencias generales del consumo de noticias en Facebook en Costa Rica. In SilesI. (Ed.) Democracia en digital: Facebook, comunicación y política en Costa Rica (pp. 19–36). San José: CICOM.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. doi:10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, A., Siles, I., Castro, A. & Chaves, A. (2020). The Mechanisms of “Incidental News Consumption” An eye-tracking study of news interaction on Facebook. Digital Journalism. doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1813047.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2020). Mob censorship: Online harassment of US journalists in times of digital hate and populism. Digital Journalism, 1–17. doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1818111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. R. R. (2002). Appraisal – The language of evaluation and stance. In J. Verschueren, J. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–27). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2012). From “third place” to “third space”: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost - The Public, 19(3), 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Graham, T., & Jackson, D. (2016). Third space, social media, and everyday political talk. In A. Bruns, et al (Ed.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 74–88). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2020). Facebook as a third space? The challenge of building global community. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), A research agenda for digital politics (pp. 171–185). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar