The humpty dumpty effect: Emerging media diffusion and (Granger) causal democratic change in 122 countries from 1946 to 2014

References

• Abbott, J. (2012). [email protected] Revisited: Analysing the socio-political impact of the internet and new social media in East Asia. Third World Quarterly, 33(2), 333–357. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.666015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Bristol: JISC. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, D., Hunt, D., & Lin, C. (2015). Diffusion theory in the new media environment: Towards an integrated technology adoption model. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 623–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailard, C. S. (2012). A field experiment on the internet’s effect in an african election: Savvier citizens, disaffected voters, or both? Journal of Communication, 62(2), 330–344. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3(1), 3–21. doi:10.1177/009365027600300101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, A. S., & Wilson, K. A. (2016). Cross-national time-series data archive. Databanks International. Available from https://www.cntsdata.com/
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, M., Mercea, D., & Charpentier, A. (2015). Tents, tweets, and events: The interplay between ongoing protests and social media. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 320–350. doi:10.1111/jcom.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. doi:10.1080/10584600802426965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. (2013). The Arab spring and its surprises. Development and Change, 44(3), 587–601. doi:10.1111/dech.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. doi:10.1177/0267323118760317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, M. L., & Wade, K. W. (2009). The internet and democracy: Global catalyst or democratic dud? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 255–271. doi:10.1177/0270467609336304
   Google Scholar
• Brough, M., & Li, Z. (2013). Media systems dependency, symbolic power, and human rights online video: Learning from Burma’s “Saffron Revolution” and WITNESS’s Hub. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 7, 281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. P., & Gregson, K. S. (2001). Media participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media & Society,3(3), 357–380. doi:10.1177/14614440122226137 3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B., & Groshek, J. (2019). Emerging media, political protests, and government repression in autocracies and democracies from 1995 to 2012. International Communication Gazette. doi:10.1177/1748048518825323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633. doi:10.1080/1369118011009703
   Google Scholar
• DeCesare, T. (2012). The Lippman-Dewey “debate” revisited: The problem of knowledge and the role of experts in modern democratic theory. Philosophical Studies in Education, 43, 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 69–83. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric methods and cross spectral methods. Econometrica, 34(3), 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2009). The democratic effects of the internet, 1994-2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. International Communication Gazette, 71(3), 115–136. doi:10.1177/1748048508100909
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2010). A time-series, multinational analysis of democratic forecasts and internet diffusion. International Journal of Communication, 4, 142–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2011). Media, instability, and democracy: examining the granger-causal relationships of 122 countries from 1946 to 2003. Journal of Communication,61, 1161–1182. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01594
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2012). Forecasting and observing: A cross-methodological consideration of Internet and mobile phone diffusion in the Egyptian revolt. International Communication Gazette, 74(8), 750–768. doi:10.1177/1748048512459147
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Q. (2011). Internet and Political Participation in China. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 5(1), 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. (2010). The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political Islam. Choice Reviews Online, 48(9). doi:10.5860/choice.48-5330
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. M., & Howard, P. N. (2013). What best explains successful protest cascades? ICTs and the fuzzy causes of the arab spring. International Studies Review, 15(1), 48–66. doi:10.1111/misr.12020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebril, N., Stetka, V., & Loveless., M. (2013). Media and democratisation: What is known about the role of mass media in transitions to democracy. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311–334. doi:10.1086/376947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2003). A boost or bust for democracy?: How the web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(3), 9–34. doi:10.1177/1081180x03008003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, M. (2011). Activism, repression, and ICT: What we know now. Meta-activism. Retrieved from http://www.meta-activism.org/2011/01/activism-repression-and-ict-what-we-know-now/
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2011). The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 971–977. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. C., & Jung, J. Y. (2017). SNS dependency and interpersonal storytelling: An extension of media system dependency theory. New Media & Society, 19(9), 1458–1475. doi:10.1177/1461444816636611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. doi:10.1111/jcom.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Nancy Chen, N.-T., Ognyanova, K., Nah, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2018). Connecting with hyperlocal news website: Cause or effect of civic participation? American Behavioral Scientist, 62(8), 1022–1041. doi:10.1177/0002764218764243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace “revolution”. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, K., & Groshek, J. (2017). A time–series, multinational analysis of democratic forecasts and (Web 2.0) internet diffusion. International Journal of Communication, 11, 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34. doi:10.1177/0010414002035001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustapha, M. L., Mustapha, L. K., & Anafi, A. B. (2018). Analyzing media role in satisfaction with democracy among undergraduates in selected universities in Kwara State, Nigeria. International Journal of Information Processing and Communication, 1(6), 202–212.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E., Stoycheff, E., & Pearce, K. (2012). Internet use and democratic demands: A multinational, multilevel model of internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 249–265. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, J., Ward, M. D., Lofdahl, C. L., Cohen, J. S., Brown, D. S., Reilly, D., … Shin, M. (1998). The diffusion of democracy, 1946–1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4), 545–574. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Tim O’Reilly. Retrieved from https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Ognyanova, K., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2015). Political efficacy on the internet: A media system dependency approach. In Communication and Information Technologies Annual. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Parlapiano, A., & Lee, J. C. (2018, February 16). The propaganda tools used by Russians to influence the 2016 election. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/02/16/us/politics/russia-propaganda-election-2016.html
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., McPhee, R. D., & Canary, D. J. (2002). Hypothesis testing and modeling perspectives on inquiry. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Day (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 23–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Relly, J., Zanger, M., & Fahmy, S. (2015). Democratic norms and forces of gatekeeping: A study of influences on iraqi journalists’ attitudes toward government information access. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 346–373. doi:10.1177/1077699015573195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhue, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2014). Digital access, political networks and the diffusion of democracy. Social Networks, 36, 40–53. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1971). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: the biased diffusion of fact‐checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255. doi:10.1111/jcom.12284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J., & Mihelj, S. (2016). Taking time seriously? Theorizing and researching change in communication and media studies. Journal of Communication, 66(2), 266–279. doi:10.1111/jcom.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista (2018). Global number of internet users 2005-2017. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/273018/number-of-internet-users-worldwide/
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E. (2017). Are ICTs democratizing dictatorships? New media and mass mobilization*. Social Science Quarterly, 98(3), 914–941. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanova, E. (2011, May). The role of information communication technologies in the “Arab Spring”. Ponars Eurasia.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2003). Introduction to econometrics. Boston, MA: Addison.
   Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., & Nisbet, E. (2014). What’s the bandwidth for democracy? Deconstructing internet penetration and citizen attitudes about governance. Political Communication, 31(4), 628–646. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.852641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Nisbet, E. C., & Epstein, D. (2016). Differential effects of capital-enhancing and recreational internet use on citizens demand for democracy. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650216644645
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media (1st ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2011). Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society, 14(2), 244–261. doi:10.1177/1461444811410679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunnava, P., & Leiter, D. (2009). Determinants of intercountry internet diffusion rates. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68(2), 413–426. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar