Much Ado About Facebook? Evidence from 80 Congressional Campaigns in Chile

References

• Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government: A theory of spatial competition based upon insights from behavioral voting research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742–757. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2019). Non-policy politics: Richer voters, poorer voters, and the diversification of electoral strategies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, A., Ballesteros, C., & Jara, R. (2017). Redes sociales y campañas electorales en Iberoamérica. Un análisis comparativo de los casos de España, México y Chile. Cuadernos.info, (41), 19-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.41.1259
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, D., Giannini, P., Luna, J. P., & Núñez, R. (2006). El secreto de mi éxito: Seis caminos para llegar y permanecer en Valparaíso. Revista de Ciencia Política, 26(1), 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, D. (2009). Clientelism versus ideology: Problems of party development in Brazil. Party Politics, 15(3), 335–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannini, P., Bahamonde, H., Luna, J. P., López, R., Astete, M. O., & Recart, G. (2011). El secreto de mi éxito: Parte II. Los caminos a Valparaíso en 2009. Revista de Ciencia Política, 31(2), 285–310.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 529–547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D., & Gerber, A. (2019). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout (4th ed). New York, NY: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honnibal, M., & Montani, I. (2017). spacy 2: Natural language understanding with bloom embed- dings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing [Software package]. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212304
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6–7), 845–879. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. (2007). Patrons, clients and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lev-On, A., & Haleva-Amir, S. (2018). Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning. New Media & Society, 20(2), 720–739. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, J. P. (2014). Segmented representation: Political party strategies in unequal democracies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, N., Oliveros, V., & Schiumerini, L. (2019). Campaigns and voters in developing democracies: Argentina in comparative perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace “Revolution”. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, P. (2019). Buying audiences: Clientelism and electoral campaigns when parties are weak. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. (2001). Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation: The European experience in historical and comparative perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, J. (2017). The political economy of income inequality in Chile since 1850. In L. Bértola & J. Williamson (Eds.), Has Latin American inequality changed direction? (pp. 43–64). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, S., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Robinson, M. (2010). Do the poor count? Democratic institutions and accountability in a context of poverty. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2014). Curbing clientelism in Argentina: Politics, poverty, and social policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., & Kim, Y. M. (2017). Equalization or normalization? Voter–candidate engagement on Twitter in the 2010 U.S. midterm elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 232–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1338174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar