Understanding the democratic role of perceived online political micro-targeting: longitudinal effects on trust in democracy and political interest

References

• Althaus, S. L. (2012). What’s good and bad in political communication research? Normative standards for evaluating media and citizen performance. In H. A. Semetko, and M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 97–112). London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446201015.n9
   Google Scholar
• Anstead, N. (2017). Data-driven campaigning in the 2015 United Kingdom general election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 294–313. doi:10.1177/1940161217706163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2017). The myths of data-driven campaigning. Political Communication, 34(4), 627–633. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1372999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas, S. (2012). The price of precision: Voter microtargeting and its potential harms to the democratic process. In I. Weber, A. M. Popescu, and M. Pennacchiotti (Eds.), PLEAD ’12: Proceedings of the First Edition Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data Maui Hawaii USA (pp. 31–36). Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2389661.2389671
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, A., & Schneider, F. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396. doi:10.1111/jcom.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. (2016). Voter databases, micro-targeting, and data protection law: Can political parties campaign in Europe as they do in North America? International Data Privacy Law, 6(4), 261–275. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipw021
   Google Scholar
• Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015a). Personalized online advertising effectiveness: The interplay of what, when, and where. Marketing Science, 34(5), 669–688. doi:10.1287/mksc.2015.0930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015b). The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 390–409. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodó, B., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). Political micro-targeting: A Manchurian candidate or just a dark horse? Internet Policy Review, 6(4), 1–13. doi:10.14763/2017.4.776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2017). Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 363–376. doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1339368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E., & Green, D. P. (2014). Do online advertisements increase political candidates’ name recognition or favorability? Evidence from randomized field experiments. Political Behavior, 36(2), 263–289. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9239-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M., & Ng, M. Y. M. (2016). Third-person perception of online comments: Civil ones persuade you more than me. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(B), 736–742. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2019). Spiraling downward: The reciprocal relation between attitude toward political behavioral targeting and privacy concerns. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1212–1231. doi:10.1177/1461444818813372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dylko, I. B., Dolgov, I., Hoffman, W., Eckhart, N., Molina, M. D., & Aaziz, O. (2017). The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, K. (2020). Targeted issue messages and voting behavior. American Politics Research, 48(2), 317–328. doi:10.1177/1532673X19875694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, K., & Kelly, K. J. (2018). Does microtargeting matter? Campaign contact strategies and young voters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/17457289.2017.1378222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieschi, C., & Heywood, P. (2004). Trust, cynicism and populist anti-politics. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 289–309. doi:10.1080/1356931042000263537
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. doi:10.1177/1461444817724170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. doi:10.1086/209380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, W. A. (2016). Manipulating citizens: How political campaigns’ use of behavioral social science harms democracy. New Political Science, 38(1), 61–80. doi:10.1080/07393148.2015.1125119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 21–30). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haenschen, K., & Jennings, J. (2019). Mobilizing millennial voters with targeted internet advertisements: A field experiment. Political Communication, 36(3), 357–375. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1548530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C. D. (2017). Exploring how consumers cope with online behavioral advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 632–658. doi:10.1080/02650487.2016.1239878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C.-D., & Nelson, M. R. (2016). The role of persuasion knowledge, assessment of benefit and harm, and third-person perception in coping with online behavioral advertising. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 689–702. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D. (2015). Hacking the electorate: How campaigns perceive voters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316212783
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D., & Schaffner, B. F. (2013). Targeted campaign appeals and the value of ambiguity. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 520–534. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, J., Williams, E. J., & Joinson, A. N. (2020). “It wouldn’t happen to me”: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 143(June), 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102498
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R., Schneider, M. C., & Pondel, K. (2015). Gender targeting in political advertisements. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 816–829. doi:10.1177/2F1065912915605182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M. (2020). Cambridge analytica’s black box. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 2053951720938091. doi:10.1177/2F2053951720938091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 348–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (2013). Messages, micro-targeting, and new media technologies. The Forum, 11(3), 429–435. doi:10.1515/for-2013-0052
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J., & Graves, L. (2019). United States. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Kalogeropoulos, and R. K. Nielsen, Eds., Reuters institute digital news report 2019 [Report], pp. 118–119. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/DNR_2019_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., & Han, J. (2014). Why smartphone advertising attracts customers: A model of Web advertising, flow, and personalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 256–269. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., Sezgin, M., & Boerman, S. C. (2016). Political microtargeting: Relationship between personalized advertising on Facebook and voters’ responses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(6), 367–372. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). News media, knowledge, and political interest: Evidence from a dual role from a field experiment. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 545–564. doi:10.1111/jcom.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhard, L., Karnowski, V., & Kümpel, A. S. (2020). Online and (the feeling of being) informed: Online news usage patterns and their relation to subjective and objective political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 181–189. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Online privacy and the disclosure of cookie use: Effects on consumer trust and anticipated patronage. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 19–33. doi:10.1509/jppm.27.1.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, J., Shehata, A., & Kruikemeier, S. (2018). Internet use and political interest: Growth curves, reinforcing spirals, and causal effects during adolescence. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1052–1078. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (Eds.). (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019 [Report]. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/DNR_2019_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.5860/choice.187753
   Google Scholar
• Ohme, J., de Vreese, C. H., & Albaek, E. (2018). The uncertain first-time voter: Effects of political media exposure on young citizens’ formation of vote choice in a digital media environment. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3243–3265. doi:10.1177/1461444817745017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakyriakopoulos, O., Hegelich, S., Shahrezaye, M., & Serrano, J. C. (2018). Social media and microtargeting: Political data processing and the consequences for Germany. Big Data and Society, 5(2), 2053951718811844. doi:10.1177/2053951718811844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilditch, T., & Madsen, J. (2021). Targeting your preferences: Modelling micro-targeting for an increasingly diverse electorate. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24, 1. doi:10.18564/jasss.4452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, B. E., & Austin, E. W. (2004). Media perceptions and public affairs apathy in the politically inexperienced. Mass Communication & Society, 7(3), 319–337. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_4
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, F. N., Saha, K., Babaei, M., Henrique, L., Messias, J., Benevenuto, F., … Redmiles, E. M. (2019). On microtargeting socially divisive ads: A case study of Russia-linked ad campaigns on Facebook. In FAT* ‘19: Conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 140–149). Atlanta: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3287560.3287580
   Google Scholar
• Ridout, T. N. (2009). Campaign microtargeting and the relevance of the televised political ad. The Forum, 7(2), 5. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1304
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Park, Y. (2020). How consumers cope with location-based advertising (LBA) and personal information disclosure: The mediating role of persuasion knowledge, perceived benefits and harms, and attitudes toward LBA. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106450. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., Tran, T. P., & Taylor, E. C. (2019). Getting to know you: Social media personalization as a means of enhancing brand loyalty and perceived quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanaland, A. J. S., Lwin, M. O., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2011). Online privacy trustmarks: Enhancing the perceived ethics of digital advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(3), 511–523. doi:10.2501/JAR-51-3-511-523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. doi:10.1080/14616700500131950
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Shehata, A. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 575–597. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). 2012: Data-driven networked campaigning. In J. Stromer-Galley (Ed.), Presidential campaigning in the internet age (pp. 140–170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190694043.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Tenove, C., Buffie, J., McKay, S., & Moscrop, D. (2018). Digital threats to democratic elections: How foreign actors use digital techniques to undermine democracy [Report]. Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions. https://democracy2017.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/01/DigitalThreats_Report-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 787–810. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. (1970). The democratic citizen: Social science and democratic theory in the twentieth century. London: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 28–51. doi:10.1177/2F1081180X05280776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, J., Delli Carpini, M. X., Draper, N. A., & Howard-Williams, R. (2012). Americans roundly reject tailored political advertising [Report]. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1414&context=asc_papers
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, E., Poels, K., & Walrave, M. (2020). How do users evaluate personalized Facebook advertising? An analysis of consumer- and advertiser controlled factors. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 23(2), 309–327. doi:10.1108/QMR-10-2018-0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duyn, E., & Collier, J. (2019). Priming and fake news: The effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., Aichholzer, J., Eberl, J.-M., Meyer, T. M., Berk, N., Büttner, N., … Müller, W. C. (2018). AUTNES online panel study 2017 questionnaires (German) [Report]. AUSSDA. doi:10.11587/I7QIYJ/MD5KAP
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D., & Drew, D. (2001). Voter learning and interest in the 2000 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism and Mass Communication Quaterly, 78(4), 787–798. doi:10.1177/107769900107800411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., Fathaigh, R. Ó., Irion, K., Dobber, T., … de Vreese, C. H. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82–96. doi:10.18352/ulr.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar