The politics of AI: democracy and authoritarianism in developing countries

References

• Allen, J. R., & Husain, A. (2017, November). The next space race is artificial intelligence. Foreign Policy, 3 1–2 .
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. C., Kaelbling, L., Russell, S., Sadigh, D., Scharre, P., Selman, B., & Walsh, T. (2019). A path towards reasonable autonomous weapons regulation. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/a-path-towards-reasonable-autonomous-weapons-regulation.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through the bureaucracy. A new vision for managing in government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (2015). Authoritarianism and democracy: Beyond regime types. Comparative Democratization, 13(2), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2019). How ideas and institutions shape the politics of public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology. Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Oxford, England: Polity Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. UCD Law Review, 51-2, 399–435. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/davlr51&div=18&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, W. (2005). Southeast Asia’s hybrid regimes: When do voters change them? Journal of East Asia Studies, 5(2), 215–237. doi:10.1017/S1598240800005750
   Google Scholar
• Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal, and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Real Society, 376(2133), 1–8. doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (1999). Paths toward democracy: The working class and elites in Western Europe and South America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. doi:10.1177/1527476418796632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crootof, R. (2016). War torts: Accountability for autonomous weapons systems. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164(6), 1347–1402. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9528&context=penn_law_review&httpsredir=1&referer=
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, X. (2020). Enforcing law and norms for good citizens: One view of China’s social credit system project. Development, 63(1), 38–43. doi:10.1057/s41301-020-00244-2
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, J. (2016). The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, 29(3), 245–268. doi:10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1
   Google Scholar
• De La Mothe, J. (1992). The political nature of science and indicators. Science and Public Policy, 19(6), 401–406. doi:10.1093/spp/19.6.401
   Google Scholar
• De Nardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L., Linz, J., & Lipset, S. M. (1995). Introduction: What makes for democracy? In L. Diamond, J. Linz, and S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Politics in developing countries. Boulder, CO, USA: Lynne Rienner. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2009). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Donahoe, E., & Metzger, M. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and human rights. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 115–126. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality. How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, S. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom. How artificial intelligence is reshaping repression. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 40–52. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filgueiras, F., & Almeida, V. (2020). Governance for the digital world. Neither more state nor more market. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Flach, P. (2012). Machine learning. The art and science of algorithms that make sense of data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 369–378. doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frischmann, B., & Selinger, E. (2018). Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• G20. (2020). Foresight: Science for navigating critical transitions – task force 3 – digital revolution. Retrieved from: https://s20saudiarabia.org.sa/en/priorityareas/Pages/tf3digitalrevolution.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. (2021). Stoping the emerging AI cold war. Nature, 593(7858), 169. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01244-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser, U., & Almeida, V. (2017). A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), 58–62. doi:10.1109/mic.2017.4180835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L. (2013). “Raw data” is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haner, J., & Garcia, D. (2019). The artificial intelligence arms race: Trends and world leaders in autonomous weapons development. Global Policy, 10(3), 331–337. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, W., & Power, T. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 68–82. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK, USA: University Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffares, S. (2021). Artificial The virtual public servant. intelligence and frontline work. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, K., Smith-Doerr, L., Alegria, S., Bell, B., Cruz, T., Hoffman, S. G., … Shestakofsky, B. (2021). Toward a sociology of artificial intelligence: A call for research on inequalities and structural change. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 7, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2378023121999581
   Google Scholar
• Kahwati, L., Kane, C., & Heather, L. (2020). Qualitative comparative analysis in mixed methods research and evaluation. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall-Taylor, A., Frantz, E., & Wright, J. (2020). The digital dictators: How technology strengthens autocracy. Foreign Affairs, 99(2), 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing presents shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuner, C. (2014). Data nationalism and its discontents. Emory Law Journal, 64, 2089–2098.
   Google Scholar
• Lagacé, C. B., & Gandhi, J. (2015). Authoritarian institutions. In J. Gandhi & R. Ruiz-Rufino (Eds.), Routledge handbook of comparative political institutions (pp. 278–291). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. (2000). Totalitarianism and authoritarian regimes. Boulder, CO, USA: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Manheim, K., & Kaplan, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Risks to privacy and democracy. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 21, 106–188.
   Google Scholar
• Maréchal, N. (2017). Networked authoritarianism and the geopolitics of information: Understanding Russian internet policy. Media & Communication, 5(1), 29–41. doi:10.17645/mac.v5i1.808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markram, H. (2006). The blue brain project. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(2), 153–160. doi:10.1038/nrn1848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1985). The society of mind. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy. Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutalib, H. (2002). Constitutional-Electoral reforms and politics in Singapore. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27(4), 659–672. doi:10.2307/3598663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1961). Computer simulation and human thinking. Science, 134(3495), 2011–2017. doi:10.1126/science.134.3495.2011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the council on Artificial Intelligence. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
   Google Scholar
• Ortmann, S. (2011). Singapore: Authoritarian but newly competitive. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 153–164. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaway, M. (2003). Promoting democracy after conflict: The difficult choices. International Studies Perspectives, 4(3), 314–322. doi:10.1111/1528-3577.403007
   Google Scholar
• Pastorella, G. (2016). Technocratic governments in Europe: Getting the critique right. Political Studies, 64(4), 948–965. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pencheva, I., Esteve, M., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2020). Big data and AI – A transformational shift for government: So, what next for research? Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), 24–44. doi:10.1177/0952076718780537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyakova, A., & Meserole, C. (2019). Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models. Policy Brief – Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/exporting-digital-authoritarianism/.
   Google Scholar
• Power, D. J. (2016). “Big brother” can watch us. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(Suppl.), 578–588. doi:10.1080/12460125.2016.1187420
   Google Scholar
• Radu, R. (2021). Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: National strategies in perspective. Policy and Society, 40(2), 1–16. doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1929728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V., & Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society, 36(1), 59–77. doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockman, B. (2019). Bureaucracy between populism and technocracy. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1546–1575. doi:10.1177/0095399719874758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J. (2019). Artificial Human compatible. intelligence and the problem of control. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. (1997). Rationality and intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1–2), 57–77. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharre, P. (2018). Army of none. Autonomous weapons and the future of war. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (1999). The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought (Vol. I). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1983). Why should machines learn?. In R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, and T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning. Symbolic computation. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 25–38. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5_2
   Google Scholar
• State Council (2017). New generation of artificial intelligence development plan (State Council Document [2017] No. 35).
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2018). Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? Policy & Politics, 47(1), 3–18. doi:10.1332/030557318X15333033030897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race. Nature, 556: 296–298. Doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04602-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy & Society, 40(2), 1–21. doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2017, November 13–17). Report of the 2017 group of governmental experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS), Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/B5B99A4D2F8BADF4C12581DF0048E7D0/$file/2017_CCW_GGE.1_2017_CRP.1_Advanced_+corrected.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2019). The age of digital interdependency. Report of the Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/pdfs/DigitalCooperation-report-for%20web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1–37. doi:10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
   Google Scholar
• Wigell, M. (2008). Mapping ‘hybrid regimes’: Regime types and concepts in comparative politics. Democratization, 15 (2): 230–250. Doi: 10.1080/13510340701846319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, N. D. (2019). . In Artificial intelligence, China, Russia, and the global order. Maxwell, AL, USA: Air University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (2007). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York, NY: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and China’s authoritarian governance. International Affairs, 96(6), 1441–1459. doi:10.1093/ia/iiaa172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar