Cookies and content moderation: affective chilling effects of internet surveillance and censorship

References

• Al-Fannah, N. M., & Mitchell, C. (2020). Too little too late: Can we control browser fingerprinting? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(2), 165–180. doi:10.1108/JIC-04-2019-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaraky, R. G., Knijnenburg, B. P., & Risius, M. (2020). Exacerbating mindless compliance: The danger of justifications during privacy decision making in the context of Facebook applications. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 12(2), 70–95. doi:10.17705/1thci.00129
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. (2020 15 September). The panopticon is already here. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/china-ai-surveillance/614197/
   Google Scholar
• Auxier, B. (2020 27 January). Most Americans support right to have some personal info removed from online searches. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/27/most-americans-support-right-to-have-some-personal-info-removed-from-online-searches/
   Google Scholar
• Ayalon, O., & Toch, E. (2017). Not even past: Information aging and temporal privacy in online social networks. Human-Computer Interaction, 32(2), 73–102. doi:10.1080/07370024.2016.1203791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. (2020). Why the “Right to be Forgotten” won’t make it to the United States. Michigan Technology Law Review. http://mttlr.org/2020/02/why-the-right-to-be-forgotten-wont-make-it-to-the-united-states/
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966. doi:10.1177/0093650218808186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchi, M., Fosch Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A., Velidi, S., & Viljoen, S. (2019). Chilling effects of profiling activities: Mapping the issues. SSRN Electronic Journal, Available at SSRN 3379275 doi:10.2139/ssrn.3379275
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulides, G., Gerrath, M. H., & Siamagka, N. T. (2021). Don't be rude! The effect of content moderation on consumer‐brand forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 38(10), 1686–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dal, A., & Nisbet, E. C. (2020). To share or not to share? How emotional judgments drive online political expression in high-risk contexts. Communication Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deibert, R. (2013). Black code: Surveillance, privacy, and the dark side of the Internet. McClelland & Stewart Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dias Oliva, T. (2020). Content moderation technologies: Applying human rights standards to protect freedom of expression. Human Rights Law Review, 20(4), 607–640. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngaa032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienlin, T., & Metzger, M. J. (2016). An extended privacy calculus model for SNS: Analyzing self-disclosure and self-withdrawal in a representative US sample. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 368–383. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermoshina, K., Loveluck, B., & Musiani, F. (2022). A market of black boxes: The political economy of Internet surveillance and censorship in Russia. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(1), 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebeily, M. (2021 20 May). Instagram, Twitter blame glitches for deleting Palestinian posts. Thomson Reuters Foundation. https://www.reuters.com/article/israel-palestinians-socialmedia/instagram-twitter-blame-glitches-for-deleting-palestinian-posts-idUSL8N2MU624
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, Y. (2018). Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4492–4511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2015). Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 167–185. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.997416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, A. (2019). Free speech and safe spaces: How moderation policies shape online discussion spaces. Social Media+ Society, 5(1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 1–15. doi:10.1177/2053951719897945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, E. A., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B., & Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the langer mindfulness/mindlessness scale. Assessment, 18(1), 11–26. doi:10.1177/1073191110386342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermstrüwer, Y., & Dickert, S. (2017). Sharing is daring: An experiment on consent, chilling effects, and a salient privacy nudge. International Review of Law and Economics, 51, 38–49. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulyk, O., Hilt, A., Gerber, N., & Volkamer, M. (2018, April). “This website uses cookies”: Users’ perceptions and reactions to the cookie disclaimer. In European Workshop on Usable Security (EuroUSEC), London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Zube, P., Lee, J., Park, C. H., & Johnston, E. (2014). Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 317–326. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 137–173.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of” placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 635. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder, B., Joinson, A., Shankar, A., & Houghton, D. (2016). The extended ‘chilling’effect of Facebook: The cold reality of ubiquitous social networking. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 582–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marthews, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2017). The impact of online surveillance on behavior. Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski, C. (2018). The “spiral of silence” revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 3–33. doi:10.1177/0093650217745429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Y., Schäwel, J., & Krämer, N. C. (2020). The shorter the better? Effects of privacy policy length on online privacy decision-making. Media and Communication, 8(2), 291–301. doi:10.17645/mac.v8i2.2846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19
   Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2020). The biggest lie on the internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 128–147. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oser, J., & Boulianne, S. (2020). Reinforcement effects between digital media use and political participation: A meta-analysis of repeated-wave panel data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 355–365. doi:10.1093/poq/nfaa017
   Google Scholar
• Penney, J. W. (2016). Chilling effects: Online surveillance and Wikipedia use. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 31, 117.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, J. (2017). Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: A comparative case study. Internet Policy Review, 6(2), 1–39. doi:10.14763/2017.2.692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping Yu, R. (2021). The emergence of surveillance culture: The relationships between Facebook privacy management, online government surveillance, and online political expression. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65(1), 66–87. doi:10.1080/08838151.2021.1897816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese, G., Riess, C., Gassmann, F., & Benenson, Z. (2020). Long-Term observation on browser fingerprinting: Users’ trackability and perspective. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020(2), 558–577. doi:10.2478/popets-2020-0041
   Google Scholar
• Rivero, N. (2021 6 May). The inventor of the digital cookie has some regrets. Quartz. https://qz.com/2000350/the-inventor-of-the-digital-cookie-has-some-regrets/
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosso, M., Nasir, A. B. M., & Farhadloo, M. (2020). Chilling effects and the stock market response to the Snowden revelations. New Media & Society, 22(11), 1976–1995. doi:10.1177/1461444820924619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported internet use—A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer, F. (1978). Fear, risk and the first amendment: Unraveling the chilling effect. BUL Rev, 58, 685.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, L. (2018 26 July). What is a ‘shadow ban,’ and is Twitter doing it to republican accounts? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/us/politics/twitter-shadowbanning.html
   Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 296–311. doi:10.1177/1077699016630255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Burgess, G. S., & Martucci, M. C. (2020). Online censorship and digital surveillance: The relationship between suppression technologies and democratization across countries. Information, Communication & Society, 23(4), 474–490. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1518472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Xu, K., & Wibowo, K. (2019). Privacy and the panopticon: Online mass surveillance’s deterrence and chilling effects. New Media & Society, 21(3), 602–619. doi:10.1177/1461444818801317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Wibowo, K. A., Liu, J., & Xu, K. (2017). Online surveillance’s effect on support for other extraordinary measures to prevent terrorism. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 784–799. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1350278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., Zhang, X., Yamamoto, M., & Morey, A. C. (2020). Cynicism, insults, and emotions in the 2016 US presidential election: An affective intelligence framework. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(4), 321–336. doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1715908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., Eicher, C., Fischer, M., Hennhöfer, A., & Lind, F. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “Online privacy literacy scale” (OPLIS). In Reforming European data protection law (pp. 333–365). Dordrecht: Springer.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_14
   Google Scholar
• Vogels, E. A., & Anderson, M. (2019 9 October). Americans and digital knowledge. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/10/09/americans-and-digital-knowledge/
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. (2013). Emotions, campaigns, and political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 414–428. doi:10.1177/1065912912449697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., Jr., Clore, G. L., & Isbell, L. M. (1999). Affect and information processing. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 1–77). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, J. L., Faris, R., Noman, H., Clark, J., Tilton, C., & Morrison-Westphal, R. (2017). The shifting landscape of global internet censorship. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, 4, 17–38.
   Google Scholar