3,782
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feminist women’s online political participation: empowerment through feminist political attitudes or feminist identity?

References

  • Abendschön, S., & García-Albacete, G. (2021). It’s a man‘s (online) world. Personality traits and the gender gap in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 24(14), 2054. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1962944
  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Cantijoch, M. (2010). Online Political Participation in Spain: The Impact of Traditional and Internet Resources. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(4), 356–368. doi:10.1080/19331681003791891
  • Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
  • Banaszak, L. A., & Plutzer, E. (1993). The social bases of feminism in the European community. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 29–53. doi:10.1086/269353
  • Bargad, A., & Hyde, J. S. (1991). Women’s Studies: A Study of Feminist Identity Development in Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(2), 181–201.
  • Baumgardner, J., & Richards, A. (2000). Manifesta: Young women, feminism and the future. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Bode, L. (2017). Closing the gap: Gender parity in political engagement on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 587–603. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1202302
  • Breines, W. (2006). The Trouble between us: An uneasy history of white and black women in the feminist movement. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
  • Brodsky, A. M., Elmore, P. B., & Naffziger, N. (1976). Development of the attitudes toward feminist issues scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 9(3), 140–145. doi:10.1080/00256307.1976.12022723
  • Brown, I. V. (1978). Cradle of Feminism: The Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society, 1833-1840. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 102(2), 143–166.
  • Brush, L. R., Gold, A. R., & White, M. G. (1978). The paradox of intention and effect: A women’s studies course. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3(4), 870–883. doi:10.1086/493544
  • Bullock, J. G., & Rader, K. (2021). Response Options and the Measurement of Political Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science, Online First. doi:10.1017/S0007123421000120
  • Butler, J. (1991). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation. Sex Roles, 62(5), 318–333. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
  • Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564
  • Dabrowski, V. (2021). ‘Neoliberal feminism’: Legitimising the gendered moral project of austerity. The Sociological Review, 69(1), 90–106. doi:10.1177/0038026120938289
  • De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. Paris, France: Gallimard.
  • Dean, J., & Aune, K. (2015). Feminism Resurgent ? Mapping Contemporary Feminist Activisms in Europe. Social Movement Studies, 14(4), 375–395. doi:10.1080/14742837.2015.1077112
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Donovan, J. (1992). Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions of American feminism. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Döring, N. (2013). Zur Operationalisierung von Geschlecht im Fragebogen: Probleme und Lösungsansätze aus Sicht von Mess-, Umfrage-, Gender- und Queer-Theorie [About the operationalization of sex/gender in surveys: Problems and solutions from survey, gender, and queer studies]. Gender, 2, 94–113.
  • Downing, N., & Roush, K. (1984). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 695–709. doi:10.1177/0011000085134013
  • Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20(3), 611–635. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00159
  • Duncan, L. E. (2010). Women’s Relationship to Feminism: Effects of Generation and Feminist Self-Labelling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 498–507. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01599.x
  • Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The Differential Relationship of Feminist Attitudes and Feminist Identity to Self-Efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 233–244. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00432.x
  • Evans, E., & Chamberlain, P. (2015). Critical Waves: Exploring Feminist Identity, Discourse and Praxis In Western Feminism. Social Movement Studies, 14(4), 396–409. doi:10.1080/14742837.2014.964199
  • Ewig, C., & Ferree, M. M. (2013). Feminist organizing: What’s old? What’s new? History, trends, and issues. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics (pp. 437–461). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fassinger, R. E. (1994). Development and testing of the attitudes toward feminism and the Women’s movement (FWM) scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 389–402. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00462.x
  • Feezell, J. T. (2016). Predicting Online Political Participation: The Importance of Selection Bias and Selective Exposure in the Online Setting. Political Research Quarterly, 69(3), 495–509. doi:10.1177/1065912916652503
  • Ferree, M. M. (2012). Varieties of Feminism: German Gender Politics in Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15–29. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01018.x
  • Fitz, C. C., Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2012). Not all nonlabelers are created equal: Distinguishing between quasifeminists and neoliberals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 274–285. doi:10.1177/0361684312451098
  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240
  • Fulenwider, C. K. (1981). Feminist Ideology and the Political Attitudes and Participation of White and Minority Women. Political Research Quarterly, 34(1), 17–30.
  • Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000431
  • Gillis, S., & Munford, R. (2004). Genealogies and generations: The politics and praxis of third wave feminism. Women’s History Review, 13, 165–182. doi:10.1080/09612020400200388
  • Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 371–379. doi:10.1177/0894439305275911
  • Hayes, B. C., & Bean, C. S. (1993). Political efficacy: A comparative study of the United States, West Germany, Great Britain and Australia. European Journal of Political Research, 23(3), 261–280. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1993.tb00359.x
  • Heger, K., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2021). Feminism! What Is It Good For? The Role of Feminism and Political Self-Efficay in Women’s Online Political Participation. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 226–244. doi:10.1177/0894439319865909
  • Heger, K., Leißner, L., Emmer, M., & Strippel, C. (2022). Weizenbaum Report 2022: Politische Partizipation in Deutschland [Weizenbaum Report 2022: Political Participation in Germany]. Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society: Weizenbaum Report 3 (Berlin, Germany). doi:10.34669/wi.wr/3
  • Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O’Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 317–348. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00158.x
  • Henley, N. M., Spalding, L. R., & Kosta, A. (2000). Development of the short form of the feminist perspectives scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 254–256. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00207.x
  • Hoskin, R. A., Jenson, K. E., & Blair, K. L. (2017). Is our feminism bullshit? The importance of intersectionality in adopting a feminist identity. Cogent Social Sciences, 3, 1–19. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1290014
  • Kay, S. A. (1985). Feminist Ideology, Race, and Political Participation: A Second Look. TheWestern Political Quarterly, 38(3), 476–484. doi:10.1177/106591298503800312
  • Kelly, C., & Kelly, J. (1994). Who gets involved in collective action?: Social psychological determinants of individual participation in trade unions. Human Relations, 4, 63–88. doi:10.1177/001872679404700104
  • Knappe, H., & Lang, S. (2014). Between whisper and voice: Online women’s movement outreach in the UK and Germany. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), 361–381. doi:10.1177/1350506814541643
  • Lacombe, M. J., Howat, A. J., & Rothschild, J. E. (2019). Gun Ownership as a Social Identity: Estimating Behavioral and Attitudinal Relationships. Social Science Quarterly, 100(6), 2408–2424. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12710
  • Laughlin, K. A., Gallagher, J., Cobble, D. S., Boris, E., Nadasen, P., Gilmore, S., & Zarnow, L. (2010). Is it time to jump ship? Historians rethink the waves metaphor. Feminist Formations, 22(1), 76–135. doi:10.1353/nwsa.0.0118
  • Lilleker, D., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2021). Women learn while men talk?: Revisiting gender differences in political engagement in online environments. Information, Communication & Society, 24(14), 2037–2053. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961005
  • Lindsey, L. L. (2014). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. London, UK: Pearson Education.
  • Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2010). Everyone feels empowered: Understanding feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 85–96. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01544.x
  • Mann, S. A., & Huffman, D. J. (2005). The Decentering of Second Wave Feminism and the Rise of the Third Wave. Science & Society, 69(1), 56–91. doi:10.1521/siso.69.1.56.56799
  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London, UK: Sage.
  • Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318
  • Molyneux, M. (1996). Women’s rights and the international context in the post-communist states. In M. Threlfall (Ed.), Mapping the women’s movement (pp. 232–259). London, UK: Verso.
  • Morgan, B. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal feminist attitude and ideology scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34, 359–390. doi:10.1007/BF01547807
  • Munro, E. (2013). Feminism: A Fourth Wave? Political Insight, 4(2), 22–25. doi:10.1111/2041-9066.12021
  • Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413. doi:10.2307/1963953
  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oser, J., Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 91–101. doi:10.1177/1065912912436695
  • Plumwood, V. (1990). Women, Humanity and Nature. In S. Sayers & P. Osborne (Eds.), Socialism, Feminism and Philosophy. A Radical Philosophy Reader (pp. 211–234). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Reger, J. (2017). Finding a Place in History: The Discursive Legacy of the Wave Metaphor and Contemporary Feminism. Feminist Studies, 43(1), 193–221.
  • Rhodebeck, L. A. (1996). The structure of men’s and women’s feminist orientations. Feminist identity and feminist opinions. Gender & Society, 10(4), 368–403. doi:10.1177/089124396010004003
  • Robison, J. (2015). Who Knows? Question Format and Political Knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(1), 1–21. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu019
  • Ruess, C., Hoffmann, C. P., Boulianne, S., & Heger, K. (2021). Online Political Participation: The Evolution of a Concept. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013919
  • Russo, S., & Amnå, E. (2016). The personality divide: Do personality traits differentially predict online political engagement? Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 25–277. doi:10.1177/0894439315582487
  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., & Verba, S. (1999). “What happened at work today?”: A multistage model of gender, employment, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 61(1), 29. doi:10.2307/2647774
  • Schuster, J. (2013). Invisible feminists? Social media and young women’s political participation. Political Science, 65(1), 8–24. doi:10.1177/0032318713486474
  • Schwartz, N. S. (2021). Guns in the North: Assessing the Impact of Social Identity on Firearms Advocacy in Canada. Politics & Policy, 49(3), 795–818. doi:10.1111/polp.12412
  • Siegel, J. A., & Calogero, R. M. (2021). Measurement of Feminist Identity and Attitudes Over the Past Half Century: A Critical Review and Call for Further Research. Sex Roles, 85(5–6), 248–270. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01219-w
  • Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
  • Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646
  • Simoni, J. M., Henley, N. M., & Christie, C. S. (1999). A lesbian feminist subscale for the feminist perspectives scale. Sex Roles, 41(11/12), 833–850. doi:10.1023/A:1018880412784
  • Snyder, R. (2008). What is Third-Wave Feminism? A New Directions Essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(1), 175–196. doi:10.1086/588436
  • Spelman, E. V. (1988). Inessential Woman. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Springer, K. (2002). Third Wave Black Feminism? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(4), 1059–1082. doi:10.1086/339636
  • Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2017). Understanding feminist activism among women: Resources, consciousness, and social networks. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 9, 1–9.
  • Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 145–159. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Theocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–14. doi:10.1177/2056305115610140
  • Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. (2018). The continuous expansion of citizen participation: A new taxonomy. European Political Science Review, 10(1), 139–163. doi:10.1017/S1755773916000230
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 153–172. doi:10.1348/014466600164390
  • Vogel, L. (1991). Telling Tales: Historians of Our Own Lives. Journal of Women’s History, 2(3), 89–101. doi:10.1353/jowh.2010.0097
  • Vraga, E. K., Anderson, A. A., Kotcher, J. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). Issue-Specific Engagement: How Facebook Contributes to Opinion Leadership and Efficacy on Energy and Climate Issues. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 200–218. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1034910
  • Weis, A. S., Redford, L., Zucker, A. N., & Ratliff, K. A. (2018). Feminist identity, attitudes toward feminist prototypes, and willingness to intervene in everyday sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(3), 279–290. doi:10.1177/0361684318764694
  • Zhang, Y., & Rios, K. (2021). Understanding Perceptions of Radical and Liberal Feminists: The Nuanced Roles of Warmth and Competence. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-021-01257-y
  • Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing Social Identities: What it Means When Women Say, I’m not a Feminist, But. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 423–435. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x
  • Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1895–1924. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x