144
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Political information search in “noisy” online environments: Insights from an experiment examining older and younger adults’ searches on smartphones and laptops

, , , &

References

  • Amsalem, E., & Nir, L. (2019). Does interpersonal discussion increase political knowledge? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 48(5), 0093650219866357. doi:10.1177/0093650219866357
  • Bailenson, J. N., Iyengar, S., Yee, N., & Collins, N. A. (2008). Facial similarity between voters and candidates causes influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 935–961. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn064
  • Banducci, S. A., Karp, J. A., Thrasher, M., & Rallings, C. (2008). Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections. Political Psychology, 29(6), 903–917. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00672.x
  • Bao, P., Pierce, J., Whittaker, S., & Zhai, S. (2011). Smart phone use by non-mobile business users. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Stockholm, Sweden. (pp. 445–454).
  • Barth, J., Burnett, C. M., & Parry, J. (2020). Direct democracy, educative effects, and the (Mis)measurement of ballot measure awareness. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1015–1034. doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09529-w
  • Berenguer, A., Goncalves, J., Hosio, S., Ferreira, D., Anagnostopoulos, T., & Kostakos, V. (2017). Are smartphones ubiquitous?: An in-depth survey of smartphone adoption by seniors. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 6(1), 104–110. doi:10.1109/MCE.2016.2614524
  • Bernhard, R., & Freeder, S. (2020). The more you know: Voter heuristics and the information search. Political Behavior, 42(2), 603–623. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9512-2
  • Bonneau, C. W., & Cann, D. M. (2015). Party identification and vote choice in partisan and nonpartisan elections. Political Behavior, 37(1), 43–66. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9260-2
  • Bunis, D. (2018, April 30). The immense power of the older voter in an election. AARP. http://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/info-2018/power-role-older-voters.html
  • Campbell, R., & Cowley, P. (2014). What voters want: Reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment. Political Studies, 62(4), 745–765. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12048
  • Chae, M., & Kim, J. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(3), 165–181. doi:10.1080/01449290410001669923
  • Champagne, K., & Boot, W. R. (2017). Exploring predictors of mobile device proficiency among older adults. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. Interaction contexts (pp. 162–171). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Coronel, J. C., & Bucy, E. (2020). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on political knowledge, misinformation, and memory for “facts. In K. Floyd & R. Weber (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Science and Biology. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Coronel, J. C., Duff, M. C., Warren, D. E., Federmeier, K. D., Gonsalves, B. D., Tranel, D., & Cohen, N. J. (2012). Remembering and voting: Theory and evidence from amnesic patients. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 837–848. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00608.x
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.
  • Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E. (2015). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), E4512–4521. doi:10.1073/pnas.1419828112
  • Feufel, M. A., & Stahl, S. F. (2012). What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(3), e87. doi:10.2196/jmir.2051
  • Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ghose, A., Goldfarb, A., & Han, S. P. (2013). How is the mobile internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 613–631. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0453
  • Guerreiro, T., Nicolau, H., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2010). Towards accessible touch interfaces. Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Orlando, FL, USA. (pp. 19–26).
  • Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472–480. Article 5. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
  • Harper, S., Yesilada, Y., & Chen, T. (2011). Mobile device impairment … similar problems, similar solutions? Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(5), 673–690. doi:10.1080/01449291003801943
  • Huang, L. N. (2000). Examining candidate information search processes: The impact of processing goals and sophistication. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 93–114. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02835.x
  • Huriash, L. J. (2018, June 25). Tamarac mayoral candidates with same last name could cause confusion. South Florida Sun Sentinel. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/tamarac/fl-sb-tamarac-gomez-november-election-20180622-story.html
  • Hwangbo, H., Yoon, S. H., Jin, B. S., Han, Y. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2013). A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 29(9), 604–618. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.729996
  • Indo-Asian News Service. (2019, April 18). Karnataka bans smartphones inside polling booths. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/karnataka-bans-smartphones-inside-polling-booths-1504456-2019-04-18
  • Jäckle, S., Metz, T., Wenzelburger, G., & König, P. D. (2020). A catwalk to congress? Appearance-based effects in the elections to the U.S. house of representatives 2016. American Politics Research, 48(4), 427–441. doi:10.1177/1532673X19875710
  • Kakulla, B. N. (2020, January). 2020 Tech trends of the 50+. Washington, DC, USA: AARP.
  • Kamvar, M., & Baluja, S. (2006). A large scale study of wireless search behavior: Google mobile search. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada. (pp. 701–709).
  • Kim, K. J., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust? Human Communication Research, 42(1), 45–70. doi:10.1111/hcre.12064
  • Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Karapanos, E., & Sinnelä, A. (2011). UX curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 473–483. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.06.005
  • Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971. doi:10.2307/2669334
  • Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leeder, J. (2019, March 29). Two PEI candidates with same name aren’t worried about being confused with one another. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-two-pei-candidates-with-same-name-arent-worried-about-being-confused/
  • Lodge, M., & Hamill, R. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. The American Political Science Review, 80(2), 505–519. doi:10.2307/1958271
  • Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 83(2), 399–399. doi:10.2307/1962397
  • Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309–326. doi:10.2307/2082427
  • Lorigo, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Granka, L., & Gay, G. (2006). The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using google. Information Processing & Management, 42(4), 1123–1131. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.10.001
  • Mainichi Daily News. (2017, January 30). City election candidates with identical names spark voter confusion worries. Mainichi Daily News. https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20170130/p2a/00m/0na/001000c
  • Malewitz, J. (2015, December 17). Ruben Hinojosa wants Ruben Hinojosa’s house seat. The Texas Tribune. https://www.texastribune.org/2015/12/17/another-ruben-hinojosa-could-shake-us-house-race/
  • Malone, S. (2016, September 13). Appeals court skeptical of new hampshire’s ballot-selfie ban. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-new-hampshire-election-selfies-idUSKCN11J13B
  • Martínez-Alcalá, C. I., Rosales-Lagarde, A., Pérez-Pérez, Y. M., Lopez-Noguerola, J. S., Bautista-Díaz, M. L., & Agis-Juarez, R. A. (2021). The effects of covid-19 on the digital literacy of the elderly: Norms for digital inclusion. Frontiers in Education, 6. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.716025
  • Moore, R. C., Dahlke, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2022). Exposure to Untrustworthy Websites in the 2020 US Election. OSF Preprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/6bgqh
  • Moore, R. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2022). A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 1. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08437-0
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Digital news report 2021. The Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021
  • O’brien, D. (2016, October 30). So you know … posting a voting selfie amounts to a felony in Illinois. Belleville News-Democrat. https://www.bnd.com/news/local/article111476147.html
  • Pang, N., Vu, S., Zhang, X., & Foo, S. (2015). Older adults and the appropriation and disappropriation of smartphones. In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Design for aging (pp. 484–495). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12045
  • Pertzov, Y., Avidan, G., & Zohary, E. (2009). Accumulation of visual information across multiple fixations. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 2–2. doi:10.1167/9.10.2
  • Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008). Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 169–183. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00306.x
  • Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2013). Studying smartphone usage: Lessons from a four-month field study. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(7), 1417–1427. doi:10.1109/TMC.2012.127
  • Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). You must remember this: A test of the on-line model of voting. The Journal of Politics, 63(1), 29–58. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00058
  • Redlawsk, D. P. (2004). What voters do: Information search during election campaigns. Political Psychology, 25(4), 595–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00389.x
  • Rozgonjuk, D., Elhai, J. D., Ryan, T., & Scott, G. G. (2019). Fear of missing out is associated with disrupted activities from receiving smartphone notifications and surface learning in college students. Computers & Education, 140, 103590. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.016
  • Smith, B., Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2020). How internet search undermines the validity of political knowledge measures. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 141–155. doi:10.1177/1065912919882101
  • Style, H., & Jerit, J. (2020). Does it matter if respondents look up answers to political knowledge questions? Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(3), 760–775. doi:10.1093/poq/nfaa038
  • Swegles, F. (2012, August 20). Two candidates, same name spells trouble. The Orange County Register. https://www.ocregister.com/2012/08/20/two-candidates-same-name-spells-trouble/
  • Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2011). The correlates of Taiwan teachers’ epistemological beliefs concerning internet environments, online search strategies, and search outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.003
  • Unkel, J. (2019). Measuring selective exposure in mock website experiments: A simple, free, and open-source solution. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/19312458.2019.1708284
  • Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., & Davis, A. K. (2009). Selective exposure in the internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility. Political Psychology, 30(4), 591–613. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x
  • Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
  • Walker, M. (2019, November 19). Americans favor mobile devices over desktops and laptops for getting news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/19/americans-favor-mobile-devices-over-desktops-and-laptops-for-getting-news/
  • Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2009). Which factors form older adults’ acceptance of mobile information and communication technologies? In A. Holzinger & K. Miesenberger (Eds.), HCI and usability for e-inclusion (pp. 81–101). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Willingham, A. (2018, November 2). Here’s what each US state says about taking ballot selfies. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/02/us/taking-selfies-when-voting-laws-in-states-trnd/index.html
  • Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B. (2009). Moments of zen: Effects of the daily show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication, 26(3), 317–332. doi:10.1080/10584600903053569

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.