Personality, networks, and heterogeneous discussion on Facebook

References

• Abendschon, S., & Garcia-Albacete, G. (2021). It’s a man’s (online) world. Personality traits and the gender gap in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 24(14), 2054–2074. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1962944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsalem, E., & Nir, L. (2021). Does interpersonal discussion increase political knowledge? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 48(5), 619–641. doi:10.1177/0093650219866357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. (1952). Group forces in the modification and distortion of judgments. In S. E. Asch (Ed.), Social Psychology (pp. 450–501). New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2018). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1311–1325. doi:10.1086/698928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., & Rooduijn, M. (2021). The populist appeal: Personality and antiestablishment communication. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 589–601. doi:10.1086/710014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, T., & Galipeau, T. (2021). The political implications of personality in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1–24. doi:10.1017/S0008423921000251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., Petroni, F., Vicario, M. D., Zollo, F., Anagnostopoulos, A., Scala, A. … Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 225(10), 2047–2059. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2015-50319-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2022). The role of personality in political talk and like-minded discussion. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(1), 285–310. doi:10.1177/1940161221994096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. doi:10.1111/pops.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, L., Rothmund, T., & Azevedo, F. (2021). Mapping political trust and involvement in the personality space: A meta-analysis and new evidence. Journal of Personality, 1–27. doi:10.1111/jopy.12700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundidge, J. (2010). Political discussion and news use in the contemporary public sphere: The “accessibility” and “traversability” of the Internet. Javnost-The Public, 17(2), 63–81. doi:10.1080/13183222.2010.11009031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2018). If … then: Algorithmic power and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eady, G., Nagler, J., Guess, A., Zilinsky, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). How many people live in political bubbles on social media? Evidence from linked survey and Twitter data. SAGE Open, 9(1), 215824401983270. doi:10.1177/2158244019832705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., Vartanova, I., & Strimling, P. (2022). How does political discussion frequency impact political moral opinions? The moral argument theory of opinion dynamics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 915252. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feezell, J. T., Wagner, J. K., & Conroy, M. (2021). Exploring the effects of algorithm-driven news sources on political behavior and polarization. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 265–287. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012). Disagreement and the avoidance of political discussion: Aggregate relationships and differences across personality traits. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 849–874. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Lazer, D., Barberá, P., Zhang, M., Allcott, H., Brown, T. … Tucker, J. A. (2023). Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on facebook. Science, 381(6656), 392–398. doi:10.1126/science.ade7138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M., Malhotra, N., Pan, J., Barberá, P., Allcott, H., Brown, T. …Tucker, J. A. (2023). How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? Science, 381(6656), 398–404. doi:10.1126/science.abp9364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., Gruber, J., Djukaric, T., Fuchs, J., & Brombach, L. (2020). Black box measures? How to study people’s algorithm skills. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 764–775. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. doi:10.1177/1075547020950735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, M. V., Ritchie, M., & Anderson, M. R. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior, 33(4), 601–624. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9147-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, B., Goyanes, M., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2021). Linking extraversion to collective and individual forms of political participation: The mediating role of political discussion. Social Science Quarterly, 102(4), 1289–1310. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, G., Pope, M., Wallis, P., & Iyer, S. (2015). The relationship between openness to experience and willingness to engage in online political participation is influenced by news consumption. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2), 181–197. doi:10.1177/0894439314534590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K., Wollebaek, D., & Enjolras, B. (2017). Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates. European Journal of Communication, 32(3), 257–273. doi:10.1177/0267323117695734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498–516. doi:10.1111/jcom.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M., & Strandberg, K. (2018). A participatory personality? Examining the influence of personality traits on political participation. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(3), 239–262. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnikov, N. (2021). Mobile Internet and Political Polarization. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3937760
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761515
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110. doi:10.1017/s0003055409990359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative vs. participatory democracy. US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., & Tavani, J.-L. (2019). Are reflective models appropriate for very short scales? Proofs of concept of formative models using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 363–372. doi:10.1111/jopy.12395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). The Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 (10th edition). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nir, L. (2012). Cross-national differences in political discussion: Can political systems narrow deliberation gaps? Journal of Communication, 62(3), 553–570. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, L. (2017). Disagreement in political discussion. In K. Kenski and K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 713–730). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, S., & Amna, E. (2016). When political talk translates into political action: The role of personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 126–130. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H. J., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2019). Personalities discussing politics: The effects of agreement and expertise on discussion frequency and the moderating role of personality traits. International Journal of Communication, 13, 92–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terren, L., & Borge, R. (2021). Echo chambers on social media: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Communication Research, 9, 99–118. doi:10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Cotter, K., Medeiros, M., & Pak, C. (2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1642934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Digital political talk and political participation: Comparing Established and Third Wave Democracies. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–14. doi:10.1177/2158244018784986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021). Outside the bubble: Social media and political participation in Western democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barbera, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2016). Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: Exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–24. doi:10.1177/2056305116664221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., Boerman, S., & de Vreese, C. (2021). Is this recommended by an algorithm? The development and validation of the algorithmic media content awareness scale (AMCA-scale). Telematics and Informatics, 62, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., Dobber, T., De Pauw, G., & de Vreese, C. (2020). Using a personality-profiling algorithm to investigate political microtargeting: Assessing the persuasion effects of personality-tailored ads on social media. Communication Research, 49(8), 1066–1091. doi:10.1177/0093650220961965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar