How negativity and policy content drive the spread of political messages

References

• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, A. P. (1997). The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, W. J., Killian McLoughlin, T., Doan, N., & Crockett, M. J. (2021). How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Science Advances, 7(33), eabe5641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Berger, J. (2013). When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 580–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J., & Neuberger, C. (2013). An investigation of influentials and the role of sentiment in political communication on twitter during election periods. Information Communication & Society, 16(5), 795–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, N., Sargent, J., & Shellnutt, S. (2019). How characteristics of members of the House of Representatives and the Political Environment Affect the Use of Political attacks on Twitter. Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., & Clark, J. H. (2016). You tweet like a Girl!’: How female candidates campaign on Twitter. American Politics Research, 44(2), 326–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, J. A., & Hunt, M. F. (2023). Negativity and elite message diffusion on social media. Political Behavior, 45(3), 955–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, P., Soroka, S. N., & Nir, L. (2020). Negativity biases and political ideology: A comparative test across 17 countries. The American Political Science Review, 114(3), 775–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2008). The role of gender stereotypes in US senate campaigns. Politics & Gender, 5(3), 301–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goren, P., & Chapp, C. (2017). Moral power: How public opinion on culture war issues shapes partisan predispositions and religious orientations. The American Political Science Review, 111(1), 110–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (2001). Processing politics: Learning from television in the internet age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., Rempala, D. M., Murphy, S., & Okdie, B. M. (2013). What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2312–2319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley, J., & Jackson, S. (2018). Political issues that spread: Understanding retweet behavior during the 2016 U.S. Presidential electio. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, T.-A., Cohen, W. W., Lim, E.-P., Pierce, D., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2013). Politics, sharing and emotion in microblogs. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. Niagara, Ontario, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jelen, T. (2009). Religion and American public opinion: Social issues. In C. E. Smidt, L. A. Kellstedt, & J. L. Guth (Eds.), The oxford handbook of religion and American politics (pp. 217–242). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonah, B., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. E., Hoffman, L. H., & Young, D. G. (2013). Online emotional appeals and political participation: The effect of candidate affect on mass behavior. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1132–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Xu, W. (2018). The more attacks, the more retweets: Trump’s and clinton’s agenda setting on Twitter. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. B., Poole, K., Rosenthal, H., Boche, A., Rudkin, A., & Sonnet, L. (2018). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database.
   Google Scholar
• Lindaman, K., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2002). Issue evolution, political parties, and the culture wars. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1), 91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. B., & Oremus, W. (2021). Five points for anger, one for a ‘like’: How Facebook’s formula fostered rage and misinformation. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Pedro-Carañana, J., Alvarado-Vivas, S., & López-López, J. S. (2020). Agenda-setting and power relations during the 2018 Colombian election campaign on Twitter. The Journal of International Communcation, 26(2), 260–280.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. (2010). American Grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rill, S., Reinel, D., Scheidt, J., & Zicari, R. V. (2014). PoliTwi: Early detection of emerging political topics on twitter and the impact on concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 69(1), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sahly, A., Shao, C., & Kwon, K. H. (2019). Social media for political campaigns: An examination of trump’s and clinton’s frame building and its effect on audience engagement. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, J. R., & Glassman, M. E. (2016). Social media in Congress: The Impact of Electronic media on member communications. Congressional Research Service report R44509.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., Zhang, F., Hemsley, J., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2018). Tweeting the attack: Predicting gubernatorial candidate attack messaging and its spread. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3511–3532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydnor, E. (2018). Platforms for incivility: Examining perceptions across different media formats. Political Communication, 35(1), 97–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election Night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, K. M., Gainous, J., & Holman, M. R. (2017). I am woman, hear me tweet! Gender differences in Twitter use among congressional candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(4), 430–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H. (2013). Civil religion and the cultural politics of national identity in obama’s America. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar