References
- Panaretos J, Malesios C. Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics. 2009;81:635–670.
- Garfield E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics. 1979;1:359–375.
- Smith DR. Identifying a set of ‘core’ journals in occupational health, part 2: lists derived by bibliometric techniques. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2010;65:173–175.
- Godin B. From eugenics to scientometrics: Galton, Cattell, and men of science. Soc Stud Sci. 2007;37:691–728.
- Sokal M. Science and James McKeen Cattell, 1894 to 1945. Science. 1980;209:43–52.
- Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Washington Acad Sci. 1926;16:317–324.
- Bradford SC. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 1934;137:85–86.
- Altbach PG. Logan Wilson and the American academic profession. Society. 1996;34:86–91.
- Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:1160–1172.
- Price DDS. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press; 1963.
- Smith DR. Historical development of the journal impact factor and its relevance for occupational health. Ind Health. 2007;45:730–742.
- Garfield E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955;122:108–111.
- Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314:497.
- Epstein RJ. Journal impact factors do not equitably reflect academic staff performance in different medical subspecialties. J Invest Med. 2004;52:531–536.
- Smith DR. Citation analysis and impact factor trends of 5 core journals in occupational medicine, 1985–2006. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2008;63:114–122.
- San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment Web page. Available at: http://www.ascb.org/dora-old/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2014.
- Franco G. Research evaluation and competition for academic positions in occupational medicine. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2013;68:123–127.
- Reif F. The competitive world of the pure scientist. Science. 1961;134:1957–1962.
- Fu TJ, Song Q, Chiu D. The academic social network. Scientometrics. 2014;101:203–239.
- Seglen PO. The skewness of science. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1992;43:628–638.
- Smith DR. Authorship, scholarship and ergonomics. Trav Humain. 2009;72:397–403.
- King C. Multiauthor papers redux: a new peek at new peaks. Sci Watch. 2007;18(6):1–4.
- Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput Networks ISDN Syst. 1998;30:107–117.
- Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Stanford University Web site. Available at: http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/1/1999–66.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2014.
- Hwai-Hui F, Lin DKJ, Hsien-Tang T. Damping factor in Google page ranking. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind. 2006;22:431–444.
- Merton RK. Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am Sociol Rev. 1957;22:635–659.
- Cole S, Cole JR. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. Am Sociol Rev. 1967;32:377–390.
- Miller JC, Coble K, Lusk J. Evaluating top faculty researchers and the incentives that motivate them. Scientometrics. 2013;97:519–533.
- Frame JD. Quantitative management of technology. Scientometrics. 1984;6:223–232.
- Ingwersen P, Larsen B. Influence of a performance indicator on Danish research production and citation impact 2000–12. Scientometrics. 2014;101:1325–1344.
- Smith DR. Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research. Scientometrics. 2012;92:419–427.
- Franco G. Scientific research of senior Italian academics of occupational medicine: a citation analysis of products published during the decade 2001–2010. Arch Environ Occup Health. doi: In press. 10.1080/19338244.2013.845136.
- Guidotti TL. Can we get still more useful information from mortality data? Arch Environ Occup Health. 2013;68:130–131.