A novel version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-3: Turkish validation study

References

• Benach J, Muntaner C. Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(4):276–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leka S, Kortum E. A European framework to address psychosocial hazards. J Occup Health. 2008;50(3):294–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leka S, Jain A, Iavicoli S, Di Tecco C. An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: achievements, challenges, and the future. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015. 10.1155/2015/213089
   Google Scholar
• Costa G. [Changes in work organization and management of psychosocial risk factors]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008;30(3 Suppl):106–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaug R, Kenyon A, Lekhi R, The Work Foundation. Stress at work. Access 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Leka S, Griffiths A, Cox T. Work Organization and stress: systematic problem approaches for employers, managers and trade union representatives. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. Access 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Official Newspaper 30 June 2012. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/06/20120630-1.htm. Accessed October 2, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Official Newspaper 29 December 2012. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/12/20121229-13.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Demiral Y, Sahan C. E-IMPRO Project. Drivers and barriers for participative prevention processes on psychosocial risks to achieve changes in working conditions. Turkish Cases Report; 2014, 5-11. Access 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tabanelli MC, Depolo M, Cooke RM, et al. Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;82(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiral Y, Baydur H, Arık H. 2012. İş Stresi Modellerinden Çaba-Ödül Dengesizliği Ölçeğinin Psikometrik Özellikleri. In 15th National Public Health Congress, Bursa, Turkey. 2–6 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Demiral Y, Ünal B, Kılıç B, et al. İş stresi ölçeğinin İzmir Konak Belediyesi'nde çalışan erkek işçilerde geçerlik ve güvenilirliğinin incelenmesi. Toplum Hekİmlİğİ Bültenİ 2007;26:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• COPSOQ International Network. Validation Studies. 2018. https://www.copsoq-network.org/validation-studies/. Accessed September 13, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Burr H, Berthelsen H, Moncada S, et al. The third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. In: The 13th European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology Conference. Lisbon: EAOHP; 2018. Accessed September 5–7, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• COPSOQ International Network. Guidelines. 2018. https://www.copsoq-network.org/guidelines/. Accessed September 13, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cole DA. Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(4):584–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering Statistic Using SPSS for Windows. London: SAGE Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nuebling M, Hasselhorn HM. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire in Germany: from the validation of the instrument to the formation of a job-specific database of psychosocial factors at work. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(3_suppl):120–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Hogh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire – a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(6):438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupret E, Bocerean C, Teherani M, Feltrin M, Pejtersen JH. Psychosocial risk assessment: French validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(5):482–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kompier M. Job design and well-being. In: The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2003:429–454.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss P, De Meester M, Kristensen TS, Braeckman L. Relationships of organizational social capital with the presence of "gossip and slander," "quarrels and conflicts," sick leave, and poor work ability in nursing homes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(8):929–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuebling M, Seidler A, Garthus-Niegel S, et al. The Gutenberg Health Study: measuring psychosocial factors at work and predicting health and work-related outcomes with the ERI and the COPSOQ questionnaire. BMC Public Health 2013;13:538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuebling M, Stossel U, Hasselhorn HM, Michaelis M, Hofmann F. Measuring psychological stress and strain at work - evaluation of the COPSOQ Questionnaire in Germany. Psycho-Social Med. 2006;3:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Berthelsen H, Hakanen J, Kristensen T, Lönnblad A, Westerlund H. A qualitative study on the content validity of the social capital scales in the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II). Scand J Work Org Psychol. 2016;1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Berthelsen H, Hakanen JJ, Westerlund H. Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire – a validation study using the Job Demand-Resources model. PloS One. 2018;13(4):e0196450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr H, Albertsen K, Rugulies R, Hannerz H. Do dimensions from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and effort-reward imbalance models? Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(3_suppl):59–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristensen TS. A questionnaire is more than a questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(3 Suppl):149–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar