References
- Rushton L. The global burden of occupational disease. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017;4(3):340–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0151-2.
- Ministère du Travail, Direction de l’animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques. Premiers résultats de l’enquête SUMER 2017 [Internet]. DARES Analyses n°041; 2019. Available on: https://dares.travail-emploi.gouv.fr/.
- Arlien-Søborg P, Simonsen L. Chemical neurotoxic agents. Fourth Edition. 2011. In: ILO Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety [Internet]. 2011. Available on: http://www.iloencyclopaedia.org/.
- Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1923–1994.
- Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Labarthe G, Chastang J-F. Role of working conditions in the explanation of occupational inequalities in work injury: findings from the national French SUMER survey. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):344 doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5254-7.
- Zins M, Goldberg M, CONSTANCES team. The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(12):1317–1328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0096-4.
- Goldberg M, Carton M, Descatha A, et al. CONSTANCES: a general prospective population-based cohort for occupational and environmental epidemiology: cohort profile. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(1):66–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103678.
- Santin G, Geoffroy B, Bénézet L, et al. In an occupational health surveillance study, auxiliary data from administrative health and occupational databases effectively corrected for nonresponse. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):722–730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.017.
- ANSES. Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety regarding the Progress Report on the Assessment of the Weight of Evidence at ANSES: critical Literature Review and Recommendations at the Hazard Identification Stage 2016. Avaiable on: https://www.anses.fr/.
- IARC. Some industrial chemicals. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Vol. 115. 2018. Available on: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG.
- IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Preamble. Lyon, France: IARC; 2015. Available on: https://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG
- Simonsen L, Johnsen H, Lund SP, Matikainen E, Midtgård U, Wennberg A. Methodological approach to the evaluation of neurotoxicity data and the classification of neurotoxic chemicals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(1):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1435.
- Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. The Lancet. 2006;368(9553):2167–2178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69665-7.
- Klimisch H-J, Andreae M, Tillmann U. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997;25(1):1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1996.1076.
- Segal D, Makris SL, Kraft AD, et al. Evaluation of the ToxRTool's ability to rate the reliability of toxicological data for human health hazard assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;72(1):94–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.005.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for Aluminium. CAS#: 7429-90-5. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2008. Available on:https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles.
- Morris G, Puri BK, Frye RE. The putative role of environmental aluminium in the development of chronic neuropathology in adults and children. How strong is the evidence and what could be the mechanisms involved? Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32(5):1335–1355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-017-0077-2.
- EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). Scientific opinion on acrylamide in food: Acrylamide in food. Efsa J. 2015;13(6):4104.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for acrylamide. CAS#: 79-06-1. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health ServicePublic Health Service. 2012.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for dichloromethane. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2000.
- INERIS. Dichloromethane. 2010. (Fiche de données toxicologiques et écotoxicologiques). Available on: http://substances.ineris.fr/fr.
- ANSES. Evaluation Des Risques de L’éthanol Pour la Population Générale 2011. (Rapport d’expertise collective). Available on: http://www.anses.fr.
- ANSES. Evaluation Des Risques de L’éthanol en Population Professionnelle 2010. (Rapport d’expertise collective). Available on: http://www.anses.fr.
- ANSES. Valeur Toxicologique de Référence Par Voie Respiratoire Pour le n-Hexane 2014. (Rapport d’expertise collective). Available on: http://www.anses.fr.
- US EPA. Toxicological Review of Methanol (non-cancer). CAS No. 67-56-1.In Support of Summary Information on theIntegrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Report No.: EPA/635/R-11/001 Fa. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 2013.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for toluene. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2017.
- INSERM. Pesticides: health effect. Collective Expert Report. 2013;583–650.
- Costa LG, Giordano G, Guizzetti M, Vitalone A. Neurotoxicity of pesticides: a brief review. Front Biosci. 2008;13(13):1240–1249. doi:https://doi.org/10.2741/2758.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for tetrachloroethylene. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2014.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for acetone. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2011.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for styrene. 2010.
- US EPA. Toxicological review of tetrahydrofuran. 2012. Report No.: EPA/635/R-11/006F. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for trichloroethylene. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2014.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for benzene. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2007.
- US EPA. Toxicological profile for benzene. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2007.
- Bahadar H, Mostafalou S, Abdollahi M. Current understandings and perspectives on non-cancer health effects of benzene: A global concern. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;276(2):83–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2014.02.012.
- Lo Pumo R, Bellia M, Nicosia A, Micale V, Drago F. Long-lasting neurotoxicity of prenatal benzene acute exposure in rats. Toxicology. 2006;223(3):227–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2006.04.001.
- Rafati A, Erfanizadeh M, Noorafshan A, Karbalay-Doust S. Effect of benzene on the cerebellar structure and behavioral characteristics in rats. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2015;5(7):568–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.05.002.
- Nielsen GD, Larsen ST, Wolkoff P. Recent trend in risk assessment of formaldehyde exposures from indoor air. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87(1):73–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0975-3.
- Zendehdel R, Fazli Z, Mazinani M. Neurotoxicity effect of formaldehyde on occupational exposure and influence of individual susceptibility to some metabolism parameters. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2016;188(11):648.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5662-z.
- Wang F, Li C, Liu W, Jin Y. Potential mechanisms of neurobehavioral disturbances in mice caused by sub-chronic exposure to low-dose VOCs. Inhal Toxicol. 2014;26(4):250–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2014.882447.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for formaldehyde. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 1999.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for vanadium. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2012.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for ammonia. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 2004.
- INRS. Fiche Toxicologique n°261. Diméthylacétamide. 2006.
- US EPA. TSCA Work Plan Chemical Risk Assessment N-Methyl Pyrrolidone: Paint Stripper Use; CASRN: 872-50-4. EPA Document# 740-R1-500. 2 March 2015. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. 2015.
- McKee RH, Herron D, Saperstein M, Podhasky P, Hoffman GM, Roberts L. The Toxicological Properties of Petroleum Gases. Int J Toxicol. 2014;33(1 Suppl):28S–51S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581813504225.
- ATSDR. Toxicological profile for 2-butoxyethanol and 2-butoxyethanol acetate. CAS#: 111-76-2 (2-Butoxyethanol); 112-07-2 (2-Butoxyethanol Acetate). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.1998.
- ECETOC. The toxicology of glycol ethers and its relevance to man (Fourth Edition). Vol. II substances profile. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals; 2005. Technical report n°95.
- Pomierny B, Starek A, Krzyżanowska W, et al. Potential neurotoxic effect of ethylene glycol ethers mixtures. Pharmacol Rep. 2013;65(5):1415–1421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1734-1140(13)71501-9.
- Sirdah M, Al Laham N, El Madhoun R. Possible health effects of liquefied petroleum gas on workers at filling and distribution stations of Gaza governorates. East Mediterr Health J. 2013;19(03):289–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.26719/2013.19.3.289.
- Fukunaga T, Yamamoto H, Tanegashima A, Yamamoto Y, Nishi K. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) poisoning: report of two cases and review of the literature. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;82(3):193–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(96)01995-0.
- Aldemir E, Akyel B, Altıntoprak AE, Aydın R, Coşkunol H. LPG Dependence after a Suicide Attempt. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2015;2015:643253–643254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/643253.
- Carles C, Bouvier G, Esquirol Y, et al. Occupation exposure to pesticides: development of a job-exposure matriw of use in population-based studies (Pestipop). J Exp Sciences & Envi Epidemiol. 2018;28:281–288.
- Mundy WR, Padilla S, Breier JM, et al. Expanding the test set: Chemicals with potential to disrupt mammalian brain development. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2015;52(Pt A):25–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2015.10.001.