Filmmaking as Pedagogy: Using Video for Creative Fieldwork in Study Abroad

References

• Anderson, P. H., L. Lawton, R. J. Rexeisen, and A. C. Hubbard. 2006. Short-term study abroad and intercultural sensitivity: A pilot study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 30 (4):457–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, D. V. 2020. Moving from critical assessment to assessment as care. Communications in Information Literacy 14 (1):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, F. 2011. Geography teaching and metacognition. Educational Research and Reviews 6 (3):274–8.
   Google Scholar
• Badstübner, T., and P. Ecke. 2009. Student expectations, motivations, target language use, and perceived learning progress in a summer study abroad program in Germany. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 42 (1):41–9.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W., dir. 2003. Goodbye, Lenin! Berlin: X Filme Creative Pool.
   Google Scholar
• Cannatella, H. 2004. Embedding creativity in teaching and learning. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (4):59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. O., and T. D. Cox. 2018. Digital video as a personalized learning assignment: A qualitative study of student authored video using the ICSDR model. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 18 (1):11–24.
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, S., and, and H. Hawkins. 2017. Critical geographies and geography’s creative re/turn: Poetics and practices for new disciplinary spaces. Gender, Place & Culture 24 (3):303–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens, S. 2017. Reading a cultural landscape: fieldwork exercise for cultural geography or advanced placement human geography students. The Geography Teacher 14 (4):173–81.
   Google Scholar
• Dooling, S. 2009. Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (3):621–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, M. M., and C. K. Peters. 2004. The benefits of study abroad. Transitions Abroad 37 (5):56–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, R., and L. Bond. 2007. Assessing the art of craft. The Journal of General Education 56 (2):126–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, J. G. 2007. What do we know about creativity?The Journal of Effective Teaching 7 (1):31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2015. Creative geographic methods: Knowing, representing, intervening. On composing place and page. Cultural Geographies 22 (2):247–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2019. Geography’s creative (re) turn: Toward a critical framework. Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):963–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmer, J. W., and N. Bloch. 2010. Teaching Geography in the blogosphere. The Geography Teacher 7 (2):73–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hippner-Page, T. 2000. Semantic clustering versus thematic clustering of english vocabulary words for second language instruction: Which method is more effective? Educational Resources Information Center 2000:1–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, V. H. 2005. Video as a learning tool: An off-campus experience in learning with media technology. In Ascilite 2005: Balance, fidelity, mobility: Maintaining the momentum, 295–303. Brisbane: Ascilite.
   Google Scholar
• Hurks, P. P. M. 2012. Does instruction in semantic clustering and switching enhance verbal fluency in children? The Clinical Neuropsychologist 26 (6):1019–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, S., C. Rickett, M. Northcote, and B. J. Christian. 2020. ‘Who are you to judge my writing?’: Student collaboration in the co-construction of assessment rubrics. New Writing 17 (1):31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kanopka, B., dir. 2009. Rabbit a la Berlin. Leipzig: Ma.ja.de. Filmpro­duktions.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. 2006. The trouble with rubrics. English Journal 95 (4):12–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kriewaldt, J. 2006. The key role of metacognition in an inquiry-based ­geography curriculum. Geographical Education 19:24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kronos Media, prod. 2015. Berlin in July 1945. McAllen, Tex.: Kronos Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, F., dir. 1931. M. Berlin: Nero-Film A.G.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. 2011. The difficulties of assessing design students’ creativity: A critical review on various approaches for design education. Journal of Design Research 9 (3):203–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lebler, D., and E. McWilliam. 2008. Aligning curriculum, pedagogy and assessment for building creative capacity in undergraduate students: A case study from the conservatorium. In Creating Value: Between Commerce and Commons Conference. http://www.cci.edu.au/publications/aligning-curriculum-pedagogy-and-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Madeja, S. 2004. Alternative assessment strategies for schools. Arts Education Policy Review 105 (5):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Maddux, W. M., and A. D. Galinsky. 2009. Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5):1047–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, C. 2014. On the creative (re) turn to geography: Poetry, politics and passion. Area 46 (2):178–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocca, A. E., J. C. Finn, E. Goetz, and L. Gibson. 2015. Teaching race, place, and history through culture and performance. The Geography Teacher 12 (4):144–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J., and L. Collins. 2018. Into the ‘field’: An exercise in exploring local and not-so-local landscapes. The Geography Teacher 15 (3):106–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., C. Alvarez, A. McFarlane, F. Gomez, S. Claro, and D. Radovic. 2009. Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education 52 (1):147–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paska, L. M. 2018. Does inquiry change learning?: Geography and the C3 framework. The Geography Teacher 15 (1):5–8.
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen. 2012. Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (2):193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., R. A. Beghetto, and G. T. Dow. 2004. Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist 39 (2):83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., J. Hanham, and P. Meier. 2018. A methodological approach to evaluate the effectiveness of learner-generated digital media (LGDM) assignments in science education. In Proceedings of EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology, 303–14. Waynesville, NC: EdMedia + Innovate Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein, B. 2002. Video use in social science research and program evaluation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 (3):22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, P. 2011. ‘So, as you can see…’: Some reflections on the utility of video methodologies in the study of embodied practices. Area 43 (3):343–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stommel, J. 2018. How to ungrade. https://www.jessestommel.com/how-to-ungrade/
   Google Scholar
• Streitwieser, B., and R. Leephaibul. 2007. Enhancing the study abroad experience through independent research in Germany. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 40 (2):164–70.
   Google Scholar
• Taranath, A. 2014. T.I.P.S. to study abroad: Simple letters for complex ­engagement. Seattle: Flying Chickadee Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tykwer, T., dir. 1999. Run Lola Run. Berlin: X Filme Creative Pool.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., M. T. Northcote, J. K. Morton, and J. Seddon. 2017. Towards engaging students in curriculum transformation: What are the effective characteristics of rubrics? In Research and development in higher education: Curriculum transformation, ed. R. G. Walker and S. B. Bedford, vol. 40, 423–33. Sydney, Australia: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar