Benchmarks for Expected Annual Academic Growth for Students in the Bottom Quartile of the Normative Distribution

REFERENCES

• American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839–851. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackorby, J., Wagner, M., Levine, P., Newman, L., Marder, C., Cameto, R.,  …  Sanford, C. (2004). SEELS Wave 1 Wave 2 overview. Retrieved from http://www.seels.net/designdocs/w1w2/SEELS_W1W2_complete_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H.S., Hill, C.J., Black, A.R., & Lipsey, M.W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Educational Effectiveness, 1, 289–328. doi: 10.1080/1934574080240072
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P. T., & Rothstein, H.R. (2011). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2.064) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C.J., & Hamby, D.W. (2012). Guide for calculating and interpreting effect sizes and confidence intervals in intellectual and developmental disability research studies. Journal of Intellectual And Developmental Disability, 37, 89–99. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2012.673575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., Thompson, B., & Vannest, K.J. (2009). Interpreting the evidence for effective interventions to increase the academic performance of students with ADHD: Relevance of the statistical significance controversy. Review of Educational Research, 79, 740–775. doi: 10.3102/0034654309331516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L.V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Education Statistics, 6, 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M.W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M.A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M.W.,... Busick, M. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of educational interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests fourth edition technical report: Forms S and T. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MAT-8 (Metropolitan Achievement Tests–Eighth Edition). (2002). Technical manual: Form V. Cedar Rapids, IA: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Odgaard, E.C., & Fowler, R.L. (2010). Confidence intervals for effect sizes: Compliance and clinical significance in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 287–297. doi: 10.1037/a0019294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, C., Chen, L., Chiang, H., & Chiang, Y. (2013). The impact of APA and AERA guidelines on effect size reporting. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 157–209. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9218-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAT-10 (Stanford Achievement Test Series–Tenth Edition). (2004). Technical data report. Cedar Rapids, IA: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 989–1004. doi: 10.1037/a0019507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TN-3 (TerraNova–Third Edition). (2010). Technical report. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2001). Group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation (GRADE): Technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2004). Group mathematics assessment and diagnostic evaluation (GMADE): Technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar