Sensitivity of Teacher Value-Added Estimates to Student and Peer Control Variables

REFERENCES

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135. doi:10.1086/508733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASA (American Statistical Association). (2014). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASA.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, D., Mokher, C.G., & Cavalluzzo, L. (2012). Using value-added assessment for personnel decisions: How omitted variables and model specification influence teachers’ outcomes (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, D., Sanders, W., & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessments of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 37–65. doi:10.3102/10769986029001037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betebenner, D.W. (2007). Estimation of student growth percentiles for the Colorado Student Assessment Program. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D., & Domingue, B. (2011). Due diligence and the evaluation of teachers: A review of the value-added analysis underlying the effectiveness rankings of Los Angeles Unified School District teachers by the Los Angeles Times. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Buonaccorsi, J.P. (2010). Measurement error: Models, methods, and applications. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Burke M.A., & Sass, T.R. (2013). Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(1), 51–82. doi:10.1086/666653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N., & Rockoff, J.E. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (NBER Working Paper No. 17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820. doi:10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concoran, S.P., Jennings, J.L., & Beveridge, A.A. (2011). Teacher effectiveness on high- and low-stakes tests (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Ehlert, M., Koedel, C., Parsons, E., & Podgursky, M. (2012). Selecting growth measures for school and teacher evaluations (CALDER Working Paper No. 80). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Education. (2011). Recommendations of the Florida Student Growth Implementation Committee. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Walch, J., & Gabele, B. (2014). Does the model matter? Exploring the relationship between different student achievement-based teacher assessments. Statistics and Public Policy, 1(1), 28–39. doi:10.1080/2330443X.2013.856169
   Google Scholar
• Guarino, C.M., Reckase, M.D., Stacy, B., & Wooldridge, J.M. (2014). A comparison of growth percentile and value-added models of teacher performance (Working Paper No. 39). East Lansing, MI: Education Policy Center, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Guarino, C.M., Reckase, M.D., & Wooldridge, J.M. (2012). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? (Working Paper No. 31). East Lansing, MI: Education Policy Center, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., & Anderson, A.A. (2012, November). Bias of public sector worker performance monitoring: Theory and empirical evidence from middle school teachers. Paper presented at the 2012 Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management (APPAM) Fall Research Conference, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., McCaffrey, D.F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D.O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D.O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (Working Paper No. 14607). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., & Betts, J.R. (2011). Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique. Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 18–42. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., Leatherman, R., & Parsons, E. (2012). Test measurement error and inference from value-added models. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12(1). doi:10.1515/1935-1682.3314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb, S., Gill, B., Johnson, M., & Booker, K. (2010). Estimating teacher and school effectiveness in Pittsburgh: Value-added modeling and results (Report to the Pittsburgh Public Schools). Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J.R., McCaffrey, D.F., Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B., Le, V., & Martinez, J.F. (2007). The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 47–67. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00026.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D., Louis, T.A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67–101. doi:10.3102/10769986029001067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D.F., Sass, T.R., Lockwood, J.R., & Mihaly, K. (2009). The Intertemporal Variability of Teacher Effect Estimates. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 572–606. doi:10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R.H., & Dokumaci, E. (2010). Value-added models and the next generation of assessments. Austin, TX: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C.N. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference: Theory and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(381), 47–55. doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.1047-7920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J.P. (2011). Different tests, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 163–193. doi:10.3102/0002831210362589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., & Jean, M. (2012). How should educators interpret value-added scores? (Knowledge Brief). Stanford, CA: Carnegie Knowledge Network, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, & student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214. doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, W.L., Wright, S.P., Rivers, J.C., & Leandro, J.G. (2009). A response to criticisms of SAS® EVAAS® (SAS White Paper). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, T.R. (2008). The stability of value-added measures of teacher quality and implications for teacher compensation policy (Brief No. 4). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., & Isenberg, E. (2013). How does a value-added model compare to the Colorado Growth Model? (Working Paper). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar