Disentangling Disadvantage: Can We Distinguish Good Teaching From Classroom Composition?

REFERENCES

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J., & Lang, K. (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1613–1634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J.R., Rueben, K.S., & Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes?: The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Billings S., Deming D., & Rockoff, J. (2014). School resegregation, educational attainment and crime: Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 435–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N., & Rockoff, J.E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., Vigdor, J.L., & Wheeler, J. (2007). High poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals (Working Paper No. 1). Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., & Max, J. (2011). Do low-income students have equal access to the highest-performing teachers? (NCEE Evaluation Brief). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Guarino, C., Brown, A., & Wyse, A. (2011). Can districts keep good teachers in the schools that need them most? Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 962–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, C., Reckase, M.D., & Wooldridge, J.M. (2013). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? (Working Paper No. 18). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaway, J., Xu, Z., Sass, T.R., Figlio, D., & Feng, L. (2010, October 19). Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower poverty schools: Implications for research, policy and management. Paper presented at the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management Fall Conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C., & Weingarth, G. (2006). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/inequality/Seminar/Papers/Hoxby06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, E., Max, J., Gleason, P., Potamites, L., Santillano, R., Hock, H., & Hansen, M. (2013). Access to effective teaching for disadvantaged students (NCEE 2014-4001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C.K. (2012). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1096–1116. doi:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B.A., & Lefgren, L. (2007). Principals as agents: Subjective performance assessment in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D.O. (2005). Using imperfect information to identify effective teachers. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D.O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (Working Paper No. 14607). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., & Reininger, M. (2004). Public policy and teacher labor markets: What we know and why it matters. East Lansing, MI: The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, R.K. (2010). Teacher quality and student inequality. (Working Paper). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D.M., & Hamilton, L.S. (2003). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S.G., Hanushek, E.A., & Kain, J.F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockoff, J.E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 537–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, T.R., Hannaway, J., Xu, Z., Figlio, D., & Feng, L. (2012). Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower poverty schools. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, J.L., Baird, M., Engberg, J., & Hunter, G. (2014). Trends in the distribution of teacher effectiveness in the Intensive Partnerships for Effective Teaching (WR-1036-BMGF). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. (2004). A cautionary note on shrinkage estimates of school and teacher effects. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 42, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P.E., & Wolpin, K.I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F3–F33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara v. State of California, No. BC484642 (Super. Ct. of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, June 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Ozek, U., & Corritore, M. (2012). Portability of teacher effectiveness across school settings. Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
   Google Scholar