Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and Their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models

References

• Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M. A., & Kulesz, P. (in press). An evaluation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension using latent variables. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. A., Ahmed, Y., Barth, A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). The relation of knowledge-text integration processes and reading comprehension in 7th- to 12th-grade students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(4), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. A., Faulkner, H., Wilkinson, M., & Dennis, M. (2004). Meaning construction and integration in children with hydrocephalus. Brain and Language, 89(1), 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, A. E., Barnes, M., Francis, D., Vaughn, S., & York, M. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 587–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branum-Martin, L., Fletcher, J. M., & Stuebing, K. K. (2013). Classification and identification of reading and math disabilities: The special case of comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 906–915.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K. (2006). Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: An investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory, 14(5), 553–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing, 12(1–2), 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(1), 45–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, M. E., Miyake, A., Keenan, J. M., Pennington, B., DeFries, J. C., Wadsworth, S. J., Olson, R. K. (2012). Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 470–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1059–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. (2000). Intrusion errors in working memory tasks. Are they related to reading comprehension ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Enos, M., York, M. J., Francis, D. J., Barnes, M. A., Kulesz, P. A., Carter, S. (2015). Text-processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehenders reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (1984). The cognitive neuropsychology of developmental (and acquired) dyslexia: A critical survey. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 169–205.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 145–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). The structure-building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In R. J. Gerrig (Ed.), Models of understanding text (pp. 289–311). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), 245–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 430–445.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., Snowling, M., & Clarke, P. (2013). Accessing, integrating, and inhibiting word meaning in poor comprehenders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 177–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1989). Reading-level-match designs: Myths and realities. Journal of Literacy Research, 21(4), 387–412.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition (KBIT-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L. G., & Hughes, K. E. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(2), 302–320.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 344–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Adlof, S. M. (2012). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. In J. P. Sabatini, E. R. Albro, & T. O'Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 3–20). Lanham, MD: Rowland & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children's inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 380–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 178–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner, A. J., Burdick, H., Sanford, E. E., & Burdick, D. S. (2006). How accurate are lexile text measures? Journal of Applied Measurement, 7(3), 307–322.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2014). A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 101–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1999). TOWRE–2 Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. P., & Kipp, K. (1998). The development of efficient inhibition: Evidence from directed-forgetting tasks. Developmental Review, 18(1), 86–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson Battery (3rd ed., Normative Update). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar