Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension

References

• Allison, P. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. Retrieved from http://statisticalhorizons.com/wp-content/uploads/MissingDataByML.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. In M. Linn, E. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 115–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G. (2006). Reading minds: What sentence-reading rate tells us about comprehension processing (Unpublished dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1989). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In D. Klahr & K. Kotofsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293. 1092-4388/06/4902-0278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2010). The nature of elementary students' science discourse in the context of the science writing heuristic approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 427–449. doi:10.1080/09500690802627277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Literacy: Trends and explanations. Educational Researcher, 12, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, T. (2014, October). A confirmatory Rasch analysis of the RFJ001. Paper presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, T. L., & Stein, Z. (2008). Cycles of research and application in education: Learning pathways for energy concepts. Mind, Brain, & Education, 2, 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, T. L., & Stein, Z. (2011). We are all learning here: Cycles of research and application in adult development. In C. Hoare (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of reciprocal adult development and learning (pp. 447–460) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, T. L., & Stein, Z. (2012, October). Measuring the growth of reflective judgment with cognitive developmental assessments. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Rocky Hill, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Diazgranados, S., Selman, R., & Dionne, M. (2015). Acts of social perspective taking: A functional construct and the validation of a performance measure for early adolescents. Social Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/sode.12157
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the Computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, M. (2001). “Hanging with friends:” Making sense of research on peer discourse in children with language and learning disabilities. In K. Butler & E. Silliman (Eds.), Speaking, reading, and writing in students with language learning disabilities (pp. 239–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, M. (2014). Perspective-taking and reading comprehension of narratives: Lessons learned from The Bean. In C. A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & G. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorders (2nd ed., pp 323–338). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdos, C., Genesee, F., Savage, R., & Haigh, C. A. (2010). Individual differences in second language reading outcomes. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 3–25. doi:10.1177/1367006910371022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Osborne, J. (2012). “Should we kill the grey squirrels?” A study exploring students' justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 401–428. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners' reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 389–421. doi:10.1111/jrir.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W. (2008). Dynamic cycles of cognitive and brain development: Measuring growth in mind, brain, and education. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer, & P. Léna (Eds.), The educated brain (pp. 127–150). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, (pp. 313–399). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M., & Smith, M. (1987). Does perspective taking ability contribute to reading comprehension? Journal of Reading, 30, 333–336.
   Google Scholar
• Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Theurel, A., & Colé, P. (2013). Reading comprehension in a large cohort of French first graders from low socio-economic status families: A 7-month longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78608. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 535–549. doi:10.1080/09500690116971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. (2012). Adolescent literacy: Learning and understanding content. Future of Children, 22, 89–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Adolescent literacy: Development and instruction. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), Handbook on reading (pp. 463–478). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55–82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 69–85). London, England: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. S., Chow, B. W, Wong, S. W, Waye, M. M. Y., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2012). The genetic and environmental foundation of the simple view of reading in Chinese. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e47872. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047872
   Google Scholar
• Høien-Tengesdal, I., & Høien, T. (2012). The reading efficiency model: An extension of the componential model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 467–479. doi:10.1177/0022219411432688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1171–1190. doi:10.1080/09500690210134857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, M., & Donahue, M. (2008, November). Reading comprehension and social inferencing in middle school students with learning disabilities. Research poster presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2004). Literacy in the academic disciplines and the needs of adolescent struggling readers. Voices in Urban Education, 3, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Schweickert, R., & William, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Theory of mind and literature. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., & van den Broek, P. (2007). Understanding the glue of narrative structure: Children's on- and off-line inferences about characters' goals. Cognitive Development, 22, 323–330. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Shankweiler, D. (2010). Expanding the simple view of reading in accounting for reading skills in community college students. Reading Psychology, 31, 454–471. doi:10.1080/02702710903241363
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for early learning. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013). The nation's report card: Trends in academic progress 2012. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2015). Selected findings from PISA 2012. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2012/pisa2012highlights_1.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association (NGA). (2010). Common Core state standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553–576. doi:10.1080/095006999290570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 947–967. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2013). Reading for understanding: How performance moderators and scenarios impact assessment design (Research Report No. RR-13–31). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T., Sabatini, J., Halderman, L., Bruce, K., Weeks, J., & Steinberg, J. (2015, March). Building theoretical and developmentally sensitive reading assessments for students in 3rd through 12th grade: Implications for intervention, and potential changes in reading proficiency. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly T., Weeks, J., Sabatini, J., Halderman, L., & Steinberg, J. (2014). Designing reading comprehension assessments for reading interventions: How a theoretically motivated assessment can serve as an outcome measure. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 403–424. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9269-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palikara, O., Dockrell, J. E., & Lindsay, G. (2011). Patterns of change in the reading decoding and comprehension performance of adolescents with specific language impairment. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 9, 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, J. (2006). Relations among theory of mind, metacognitive language, reading skills and higher order story comprehension in L1 and L2 learners. In A. Antonietti, O. Liverta- Sempio, & A. Marchetti (Eds.), Theory of mind and language in developmental contexts (pp. 77–92). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C. P., August, D., Carlo, M. S., & Snow, C. E. (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 159–169. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S., Valentino, R., & Shores, K. (2012). Patterns of literacy among U.S. students. Future of Children, 22(2), 17–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., & O'Reilly, T. (2013). Rationale for a new generation of reading comprehension assessments. In B. Miller, L. Cutting, & P. McCardle (Eds.), Unraveling reading comprehension: Behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components (pp. 100–111). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., O'Reilly, T., & Deane, P. (2013). Preliminary reading literacy assessment framework: Foundation and rationale for assessment and system design. (Research Report No. RR-13–30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., O'Reilly, T., Halderman, L., & Bruce, K. (2014a). Broadening the scope of reading comprehension using scenario-based assessments: Preliminary findings and challenges. International Journal Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 114, 693–723.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., O'Reilly, T., Halderman, L., & Bruce, K. (2014b). Integrating scenario-based and component reading skill measures to understand the reading behavior of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 36–43. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., Petscher, Y., O'Reilly, T., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Improving comprehension assessment for middle and high school students: Challenges and opportunities. In D. Reed & K. Santi (Eds.), Improving reading comprehension of middle and high school students (pp. 119–151). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23–55. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R. (2001). The “simple view” of reading: Some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17, 17–33. doi:10.1080/02667360120039951
   Google Scholar
• Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report 2003–1). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 14, 431–459. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 23, 139–159. doi:10.1080/10573560601158461
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Oteiza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 67–93. doi:10.2307/3588259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2006). An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 254–268. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 393–429. doi:10.1177/1086296×11424071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shantz, C. U. (1982). Thinking about people thinking about people. Contemporary Psychology, 27, 376–377.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. D., Speece, D. L., Harring, J. R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency has a role in the simple view of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 108–133. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.618153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiu, R. D., Thompson, L. A., & Lewis, B. A. (2003). The role of IQ in a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 424–436. doi:10.1177/00222194030360050401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uccelli, P., Barr, C. D., Dobbs, C. L., Phillips Galloway, E., Meneses, A., & Sánchez, E. (2015). Core academic language skills (CALS): An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in pre-adolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1077–1109. doi:10.1017/S014271641400006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uccelli, P., Phillips Galloway, E., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A., & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross-disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 337–356
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. K. (1997). A secondary analysis of claims regarding the reflective judgment interview: Internal consistency, sequentiality and intra-individual differences in ill-structured problem-solving. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 243–312). New York, NY: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing in history. Written Communication, 15, 25–86. doi:10.1177/0741088398015001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., Klein, J. S., & Klein, P. (2001). Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 37–58. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar