Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions for Students in the Primary Grades

References

• Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). To wait in Tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first-grade response to intervention in reading. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 11–27. doi:10.1177/0014402914532234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300–316. doi:10.1177/07419325020230050501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., Kim, Y. S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Long-term effects of first-grade multitier intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 250–267. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.906692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allor, J., & McCathren, R. (2004). The efficacy of an early literacy tutoring program implemented by college students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19(2), 116–129. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00095.x
   Google Scholar
• Balu, R., Zhu, P., Doolittle, F., Schiller, E., Jenkins, J., & Gersten, R. (2015). Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading (NCEE 2016-4000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20164000/pdf/20164000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Vermeulen, K., & Fulton, C. M. (2006). Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 334–351. doi:10.1177/00222194060390040701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Clonan, S. M., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and a 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 444–461. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Murray, M. S., Munger, K. A., & Vaughn, M. G. (2014). Intensive reading remediation in grade 2 or 3: Are there effects a decade later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 46–57. doi:10.1037/a0033663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., Silverman, R., Ritchey, K. D., Schatschneider, C., Cooper, D. H., … Jacobs, D. (2010). Validation of a supplemental reading intervention for first-grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 402–417. doi:10.1177/0022219409355475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, L., Speece, D., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Montanaro, E., & Ritchey, K. (2014). Immediate and long-term effects of tier 2 reading instruction for first-grade students with a high probability of reading failure. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 28–53. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.786771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Research and Reform in Education & Johns Hopkins University. (2019). Evidence for ESSA: Standards and procedures. Retrieved from https://content.evidenceforessa.org/sites/default/files/On%20clean%20Word%20doc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Taylor, W. P., Barth, A. E., & Vaughn, S. (2014). An experimental evaluation of guided reading and explicit interventions for primary-grade students at-risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 268–293. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.906010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Nimon, K., Mathes, P. G., Swanson, E. A., Kethley, C., Kurz, T. B., & Shih, M. (2010). Effectiveness of a supplemental early reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 394–416. doi:10.1177/001440291007600402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D. J. (2013). Effects of tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 633–648. doi:10.1037/a0032581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44. doi:10.1080/19345740802539200
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114–95, § 8101(21)(A), 129 Stat.1939 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., Fu, D., & Lamme, L. L. (2004). From scripted instruction to teacher empowerment: Supporting literacy teachers to make pedagogical transitions. Literacy (Formerly Reading), 38(1), 58–64. doi:10.1111/j.0034-0472.2004.03801010.x
   Google Scholar
• Fien, H., Smith, J. L. M., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S. K., Nelson, N. J., & Chaparro, E. (2015). An examination of the efficacy of a multitiered intervention on early reading outcomes for first grade students at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 602–621. doi:10.1177/0022219414521664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/21
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., & Dombek, J. (2018). The relative impact of aligning Tier 2 intervention materials with classroom core reading materials in grades K–2. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 477–504. doi:10.1086/696021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A., & Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading (CVR i). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274–288. doi:10.1177/0741932518772904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G. N. (2008). Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413–436. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9083-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2017). Critique of the national evaluation of response to intervention: A case for simpler frameworks. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 255–268. doi:10.1177/0014402917693580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with math disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 79–92. doi:10.2307/20528819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamse, B. C., Jacob, R. T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., & Unlu, F. (2008). Reading first impact study final report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Chard, D., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Jayanthi, M., & Dimino, J. (2017). Too much, too soon? A commentary on what the national RtI evaluation left unanswered and what reading intervention research tells us. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 244–254. doi:10.1177/0014402917692847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, T., Zangrillo, A., Biondi-Zoccai, G., & Landoni, G. (2013). Meta-analysis: Pitfalls and hints. Heart, Lung and Vessels, 5(4), 219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., Black, C., & Blair, J. (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. The Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 66–85. doi:10.1177/00224669050390020301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedberg, E. C. (2011). ROBUMETA: Stata module to perform robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Boston, MA: Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. doi:10.3102/10769986006002107
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. doi:10.1002/jrsm.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400, 118 Stat. 2649 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R., Armstrong, C., Bowden, A. B., & Pan, Y. (2016). Leveraging volunteers: An experimental evaluation of a tutoring program for struggling readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(Supp 1), 67–92. doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1138560
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Peyton, J. A., Sanders, E. A., & Vadasy, P. F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 53–85. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H. B., Pullen, P. C., Hudson, R. F., & Konold, T. R. (2009). Identifying essential instructional components of literacy tutoring for struggling beginning readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 277–297. doi:10.1080/19388070902875173
   Google Scholar
• López-López, J. A., Van den Noortgate, W., Tanner-Smith, E. E., Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2017). Assessing meta‐regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(4), 435–450. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, H., Sirinides, P., Gray, A., & Goldsworthy, H. (2016). Reading recovery: An evaluation of the four-year i3 scale-up. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD]. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [NCLB], Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 1201, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., Swanson, H. L., & Geraghty, C. (2010). Improvement in reading rate under independent and difficult text levels: Influences on word and comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 1–19. doi:10.1037/a0017488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Monaghan, M. C. (2004). Effects of a volunteer tutoring model on the early literacy development of struggling first grade students. Reading Research and Instruction, 43(4), 21–40. doi:10.1080/19388070409558415
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D. M., Vellutino, F. R., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D. P., & Sweeney, J. M. (2005). Severe reading difficulties–Can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13(4), 209–227. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1304_3
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. M. (2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in the reading recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 257–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6(1), 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L. M., Nelson, N. J., Fien, H., Smolkowski, K., Kosty, D., & Baker, S. K. (2016). Examining the efficacy of a multitiered intervention for at-risk readers in grade 1. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 549–573. doi:10.1086/686249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software (Release 14). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
   Google Scholar
• Stuebing, K. K., Barth, A. E., Trahan, L. H., Reddy, R. R., Miciak, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2015). Are child cognitive characteristics strong predictors of responses to intervention? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 395–429. doi:10.3102/0034654314555996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(6), 504–532. doi:10.1177/002221949903200605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner‐Smith, E. E., & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 13–30. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 375–393. doi:10.1037/met0000011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tivnan, T., & Hemphill, L. (2005). Comparing four literacy reform models in high-poverty schools: Patterns of first-grade achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 105(5), 419–441. doi:10.1086/431885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B., & Swanson, H. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 283–295. doi:10.1177/0022219410378447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education [U.S. ED], Institute of Education Sciences [IES], & What Works Clearinghouse [WWC]. (2013). What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2011). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled first graders: How language minority status and pretest characteristics moderate treatment response. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(6), 471–497. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.501091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Peyton, J. A. (2006). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27(6), 365–378. doi:10.1177/07419325060270060601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Tudor, S. (2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 508–525. doi:10.1177/00222194070400060301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Tolar, T., Fletcher, J. M., Cardenas-Hagan, E., Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2008). Long-term follow-up of Spanish and English interventions for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(3), 179–214. doi:10.1080/19345740802114749
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2002). The Interactive Strategies approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 573–635. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Algozzine, B. (2008). Effects of targeted intervention on early literacy skills of at-risk students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(4), 425–439. doi:10.1080/02568540809594637
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Stevens, E. A., Williams, K. J., Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S., & Sargent, K. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 612–624. doi:10.1177/0022219418775110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 126–142. doi:10.1177/0022219407313426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A., & Capin, P. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, P., Martens, P., & Arya, P. (2005). Accountability for reading and readers: What the numbers don’t tell. The Reading Teacher, 58(7), 622–631. doi:10.1598/RT.58.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar