Call Me Maybe: Using Incentives and Follow-Ups to Increase Principals’ Survey Response Rates

References

• Altschuld, J. W., Thomas, P. M., McColskey, W. H., Smith, D. W., Wiesmann, W. W., & Lower, M. W. (1992). Mailed evaluation questionnaires: Replications of a 96 percent return rate procedure. Evaluation and Program Planning, 15(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(92)90087-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Befort, C., Lynch, R., James, R. L., Carroll, S. L., Nollen, N., & Davis, A. (2008). Perceived barriers and benefits to research participation among school administrators. The Journal of School Health, 78(11), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00349.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, C. L., Shakeshaft, A. P., Doran, C. M., Sanson‐Fisher, R. W., & Mattick, R. P. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of follow-up contact for a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34(5), 508–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00598.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, S., & Glasman, N. S. (2008). Fear, the school organization, and teacher evaluation. Educational Policy, 22(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807311297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L. (2016). Teacher evaluation reform: Focus, feedback, and fear. Educational Leadership, 73, 72–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. L., Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2014). An experimental test of the effects of survey sponsorship on internet and mail survey response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, A. K., Berzofsky, M. E., Shook-Sa, B. E., Lindquist, C. H., Enders, K. P., Krebs, C. P., Planty, M., & Langton, L. (2018). The impact of greeting personalization on prevalence estimates in a survey of sexual assault victimization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerwegh, D. (2005). Effects of personal salutations in e-mail invitations to participate in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. T. (2011). An experiment to test the feasibility and quality of a web-based questionnaire of teachers. Evaluation Review, 35(1), 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X11399376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. T., & Jacob, B. (2012). Prenotification, incentives, and survey modality: An experimental test of methods to increase survey response rates of school principals. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.698375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano, M., Franke, T., Afifi, A. A., & Bourque, L. B. (2008). Adequacy of reporting results of school surveys and nonresponse effects: A review of the literature and a case study. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08326859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D. L. and Cole, R. (2017). Estimating program effects on program participants. US Department of Health and Human Services Evaluation Technical Assistance Brief. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/sites/default/files/estimating-program-effects-on-program-participants-brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, A., Caporaso, A., Cantor, D., & Townsend, R. (2015). How much gets you how much? Monetary incentives and response rates in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokher, C., & Pearson, J. L. (2017). The complexities of recruiting participants for a statewide education survey. Survey Practice, 10(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2017-0023
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, R. F., Leykin, Y., Barrera, A. Z., Brown, C. H., & Bunge, E. L. (2017). The impact of phone calls on follow-up rates in an online depression prevention study. Internet Interventions, 8, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2017.02.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neal, Z. P., & Neal, J. W. (2019). That’ll move the chains: Collecting network chain data. Social Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, S., & Rickinson, M. (2019). Understanding school engagement in and with research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0292-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, M. W., Grimm, G., Stecher, B., & Opfer, V. D. (2018). A comparison of strategies for recruiting teachers into survey panels. SAGE Open, 8(3), 215824401879641. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018796412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilpzand, E. J., Sciberras, E., Efron, D., Anderson, V., & Nicholson, J. M. (2015). Improving survey response rates from parents in school-based research using a multi-level approach. PLoS One, 10(5), e0126950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar