Impact of Providing Teachers and Principals with Performance Feedback on Their Practice and Student Achievement: Evidence from a Large-Scale Randomized Experiment

References

• Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association. (2015). AERA statement on use of value-added models (VAM) for the evaluation of educators and educator preparation programs. Educational Researcher, 44(8), 448–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Statistical Association. (2014). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. American Statistical Association. http://www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. http://www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Gathering_Feedback_Research_Paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, H., Speroni, C., Herrmann, M., Hallgren, K., Burkander, P., & Wellington, A. (2017). Evaluation of the Teacher Incentive Fund: Final report on implementation and impacts of pay-for-performance across four years (NCEE 2017–4004). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Consortium of School Research. (2012). 2012 CPS My Voice, My School Teacher Survey codebook. Chicago Consortium of School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, C., & Clifford, M. (2010). Measuring principal performance: How rigorous are commonly used principal performance assessment instruments? Learning Point Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance Ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10(4), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Teacher evaluation reform: Policy lessons for school principals. Principal’s Research Review, 9(5), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Brown, S., Rickles, J., Song, M., & Manzeske, D. (2018). The impact of providing performance feedback to teachers and principals (NCEE 2018–4001). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., Loeb, S., Goldhaber, D., Staiger, D., Raudenbush, S., & Whitehurst, G. (2010). Evaluating teachers: The important role of value-added. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/1117_evaluating_teachers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., Protik, A., Teh, B., Bruch, J., & Max, J. (2013). Transfer incentives for high performing teachers: Final results from a multisite experiment (NCEE 2014–4003). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1997). Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. The Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.2307/146181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Cravens, X. C., Murphy, J., Porter, A. C., Elliott, S. N., & Carson, B. (2009). The evaluation of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership? The Elementary School Journal, 110(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/598841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1086/669901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2 (3), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794–831. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210387916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. D., & Kane, T. J. (2013). The reliability of classroom observations by school personnel. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (No. w14607). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., Mihaly, K., & Rockoff, J. E. (2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47(C), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., Miller, L., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Performance screens for school improvement: The case of teacher tenure reform in New York city. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Hamre, B. K., Justice, L. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Consultation for teachers and children’s language and literacy development during pre-kindergarten. Applied Developmental Science, 14(4), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2010.516187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L. D., Nguyen, T. D., & Springer, M. G. (2017). Teacher merit pay and student test scores: A meta-analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323177679_Teacher_Merit_Pay_and_Student_Test_Scores_A_Meta-Analysis
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., Polikoff, M. S., Goldring, E., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & May, H. (2010). Investigating the validity and reliability of the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 282–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/656301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259–297). AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Portin, B. S., Feldman, S., & Knapp, M. S. (2006). Purposes, uses, and practices of leadership assessment in education. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Puma, M. J., Olsen, R. B., Bell, S. H., & Price, C. (2009). What to do when data are missing in group randomized controlled trials (NCEE 2009-0049). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED511781.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sawchuk, S., & Heitin, L. (2014, July 25). AFT, NEA agendas converge amid external, Internal Pressure. Education Week, 33(32). https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/07/25/37unions.h33.html
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporte, S. E., Stevens, W. D., Healey, K., Jiang, J., & Hart, H. (2013). Teacher evaluation in practice: Implementing Chicago’s REACH students. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M., & Sartain, L. (2015). Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago’s Excellence in Teaching project. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 535–572. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Superville, D. R. (2014, May 14). State forge ahead on principal evaluation. Education Week, 33(32). https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/05/21/32principals_ep.h33.html
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628–3651. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D., Holdaway, E., & Ward, K. (2000). Policies and practices involved in the evaluation of school principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008167130999
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2014). ESEA flexibility: Guidance for renewal process. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/flex-renewal/flexguidrenewal2014.doc
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. The New Teacher Project.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse procedures handbook (Version 4.1). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar