A Meta-Analysis of Mathematical Interventions for Increasing the Word Problem Solving Performance of Upper Elementary and Secondary Students with Mathematics Difficulties

References

• Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, U. (2010). Skill development in different components of arithmetic and basic cognitive functions: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study of children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072
   Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A. (1999). Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students. The Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903300202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., & Cho, S. J. (2013). Effects of enhanced anchored instruction on skills aligned to common core math standards. Learning Disabilities,19(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2013-V19-I2-4796.
   Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59(6), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299305900608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z. D., & Hung, Y. H. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 186–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S. J. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., Rueda, E., Grant, T. S., Stephens, A. C., & LaRoque, P. T. (2010). Anchoring problem-solving and computation instruction in context-rich learning environments. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., Rueda, E., LaRoque, P. T., Serlin, R. C., & Kwon, J. (2007). Integrating reform‐oriented math instruction in special education settings. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00234.x.
   Google Scholar
• *Bottge, B. A., Toland, M. D., Gassaway, L., Butler, M., Choo, S., Griffen, A. K., & Ma, X. (2015). Impact of enhanced anchored instruction in inclusive math classrooms. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. (2009). Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340902400202.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2015). Children's mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction (2nd edition). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cawley, J. F., Parmar, R. S., Foley, T. E., Salmon, S., & Roy, S. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students. Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, L. S., Elias, J. T., Powell, S. R., & Schumacher, R. F. (2015). Cognitive and mathematical profiles for different forms of learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413494239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J. K., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC's standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Exceptional Children [CEC]. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence‐based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914531388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. S., Sharp, E., Chovanes, J., Thomas, A., Burns, R. M., Custer, B., & Park, J. (2016). A meta‐analysis of empirical research on teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(3), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Child Succeeds Act (ESSA), 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2015). www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• *Fede, J. L., Pierce, M. E., Matthews, W. J., & Wells, C. S. (2013). The effects of a computer-assisted, schema-based instruction intervention on word problem-solving skills of low-performing fifth grade students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800102.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E. (2015). Robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important? Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522966.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(6), 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350060701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Appleton, A. C. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem‐solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 17(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00036.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 79–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., Powell, S. R., Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Seethaler, P. M., & Tolar, T. D. (2016a). The role of cognitive processes, foundational math skill, and calculation accuracy and fluency in word-problem solving versus prealgebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2085–2098. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fuchs, L. S., Malone, A. S., Schumacher, R. F., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Jordan, N. C., Siegler, R. S., Gersten, R., & Changas, P. (2016a). Supported self-explaining during fraction intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A. S., Wang, A., Hamlett, C. L., Jordan, N. C., Siegler, R. S., & Changas, P. (2016b). Effects of intervention to improve at-risk fourth graders' understanding, calculations, and word problems with fractions. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 625–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/686303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Sterba, S. K., Craddock, C., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Geary, D. C., & Changas, P. (2021). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2017). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (17.0 update (4th ed.)). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. C., Gagnon, J. C., Jossi, M. H., Ulrich, T. G., & Myers, J. A. (2018). Priming mathematics word problem structures in a rural elementary classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518772164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwell, M., & Maeda, Y. (2008). Deficiencies of reporting in meta-analyses and some remedies. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(4), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.4.403-430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 426–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hutchinson, N. L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(1), 34–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., & Star, J. R. (2012). An exploratory study contrasting high-and low-achieving students' percent word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Alghamdi, A., Edmunds, R., McKevett, N. M., Mouanoutoua, J., & Roesslein, R. (2021). The effects of Tier 2 mathematics interventions for students with mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 87(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920969187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Dupuis, D. N., Star, J. R., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2016). The effects of schema-based instruction on the proportional thinking of students with mathematics difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 354–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., McGoey, K., Gardill, M. C., Bhat, P., & Riley, T. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(6), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Dupuis, D. N., & Karl, S. R. (2017). A randomized trial of the effects of schema-based instruction on proportional problem-solving for students with mathematics problem-solving difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416629646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Karl, S. R., Simonson, G. R., & Slater, S. C. (2017). Investigating a Tier 1 intervention focused on proportional reasoning: A follow-up study. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917691017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Lein, A. E., Im, S. H., Alghamdi, A. A., Hefte, S. B., & Mouanoutoua, J. (2018). Mathematical interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917737467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Starosta, K., Leh, J. M., Sood, S., Caskie, G., Hughes, C. L., & Mack, T. R. (2009). Improving seventh grade students' learning of ratio and proportion: The role of schema-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kajamies, A., Vauras, M., & Kinnunen, R. (2010). Instructing low‐achievers in mathematical word problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(4), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2010.493341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(1), 23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiru, E. W., Doabler, C. T., Sorrells, A. M., & Cooc, N. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417745835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, J. E., Yan, C., Serceki, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2021). Word-problem-solving interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721994843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Konold, K. B. (2004). Using the concrete-representational-abstract teaching sequence to increase algebra problem-solving skills [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses]. (Accession Order No. AAT 3143383).
   Google Scholar
• *Lambert, M. A. (1996). Teaching students with learning disabilities to solve word-problems: A comparison of a cognitive strategy and a traditional textbook method [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses]. (UMI No. 9639550).
   Google Scholar
• *Lee, J. W. (1992). The effectiveness of a novel direct instructional approach on math word problem solving skills of elementary students with learning disabilities [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University].
   Google Scholar
• Lein, A. E., Jitendra, A. K., & Harwell, M. R. (2020). Effectiveness of mathematical word problem solving interventions for students with learning disabilities and/or mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1388–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Li, Y., & Brooks, G. (2016). Outlier impact and accommodation methods: Multiple comparisons of type I error rates. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 15(1), 452–471. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol15/iss1/23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., Roberts, M., Anthony, K. S., & Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Maccini, P., Mulcahy, C. A., & Wilson, M. G. (2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00231.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–47). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Miake-Lye, I. M., Hempel, S., Shanman, R., & Shekelle, P. G. (2016). What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Natasha Beretvas, S., Ferron, J., Bunuan, R., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017). Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: A comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G, The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague, M., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711421762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Moore, L. J., & Carnine, D. (1989). Evaluating curriculum design in the context of active teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258901000406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Muoneke, A. F. (2001). The effects of a question and action strategy on the mathematical word problem-solving skills of students with learning problems in mathematics [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses].
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. A., Brownell, M. T., Griffin, C. C., Hughes, E. M., Witzel, B. S., Gage, N. A., Peyton, D., Acosta, K., & Wang, J. (2021). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with mathematics difficulties (MD): A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. A., Wang, J., Brownell, M. T., & Gagnon, J. C. (2015). Mathematics interventions for students with learning disabilities (LD) in secondary school: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13(2), 207–235.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2020a). NAEP report card: 2019 NAEP mathematics assessment highlighted results at grades 4 and 8 for the nation, states, and districts. U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2020b). Trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Executive summary: Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, M., Drigas, A., Malli, E., & Kalpidi, V. (2018). Enhanced assessment technology and neurocognitive aspects of specific learning disorder with impairment in mathematics. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 8(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v8i1.7370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., & Pigott, T. D. (2015). The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2018). Effective word-problem instruction: Using schemas to facilitate mathematical reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Doabler, C. T., Akinola, O. A., Therrien, W. J., Maddox, S. A., & Hess, K. E. (2020). A synthesis of elementary mathematics interventions: Comparisons of students with mathematics difficulty with and without comorbid reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419881646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the common core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Mason, E. N., Bos, S. E., Hirt, S., Ketterlin‐Geller, L. R., & Lembke, E. S. (2021). A systematic review of mathematics interventions for middle‐school students experiencing mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 295–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G., & Powell, S. R. (2018). Computation error analysis: Students with mathematics difficulty compared to typically achieving students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417745627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protogerou, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). A checklist to assess the quality of survey studies in psychology methods in psychology. Methods in Psychology, 3, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100031
   Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J. E., & Rodgers, M. A. (2019). Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(1), 57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, M. A., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2021). Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes. Psychological Methods, 26(2), 141–160.. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. RMC, Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., & Stuebing, K. K. (2014). Meta-analysis with complex research designs: Dealing with dependence from multiple measures and multiple group comparisons. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 328–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Scarlato, M. C., & Burr, W. A. (2002). Teaching fractions to middle school students. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2(1), 23–38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ650268
   Google Scholar
• *Sharpe, S. T., Fults, R., & Krawec, J. (2014). The effects of a mathematical problem-solving intervention on the errors made by middle school students with and without learning disabilities. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• *Shiah, R. L., Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Fulk, B. J. M. (1994). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 5(3), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex0503_2
   Google Scholar
• Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2017). Improving the fraction word problem solving of students with mathematics learning disabilities: Interactive computer application. Remedial and Special Education 38(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516669052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, M., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., McKenna, J. W., Hou, F., & Ok, M. W. (2017). Virtual manipulatives: Tools for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(3), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216644830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., Rodgers, M. A., & Powell, S. R. (2018). Mathematics interventions for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517731887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C., & Orosco, M. (2013). Effects of cognitive strategy interventions and cognitive moderators on word problem solving in children at risk for problem solving difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(4), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Ahmadi, H. (2019). A history of meta-regression: Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. M., Bird, S. M., & Higgins, J. P. (2013). The impact of study size on meta-analyses: Examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews. PLoS One, 8(3), e59202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Garderen, D., Scheuermann, A., & Poch, A. (2014). Challenges students identified with a learning disability and as high-achieving experience when using diagrams as a visualization tool to solve mathematics word problems. ZDM, 46(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0519-1
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
   Google Scholar
• *Walker, D. W., & Poteet, J. A. (1990). A comparison of two methods of teaching mathematics story problem-solving with learning disabled students. National Forum of Special Education Journal, 1(1), 44–51. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ408630
   Google Scholar
• *Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Gilbert, J. K., Krowka, S., & Abramson, R. (2019). Embedding self-regulation instruction within fractions intervention for third graders with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning disabilities, 52(4), 337–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Lenz, K. B., & Blackorby, J. (2013). Math growth trajectories of students with disabilities: Disability category, gender, racial, and socioeconomic status differences from ages 7 to 17. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wilson, C. L., & Sindelar, P. T. (1991). Direct instruction in math word problems: Students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 512–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, B. (2016). Bridging the gap between arithmetic and algebra. Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, B. S., Riccomini, P. J., & Herlong, M. L. (2013). Building number sense through the common core. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, J., Beckmann, S., Driscoll, M., Franke, M., Herzig, P., Jitendra, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Ogbuehi, P. (2018). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education 32(4), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Xin, Y. P., Jitendra, A. K., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Xin, Y. P., Tzur, R., Hord, C., Liu, J., Park, J. Y., & Si, L. (2017). An intelligent tutor-assisted mathematics intervention program for students with learning difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716648740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Xin, Y. P., Zhang, D., Park, J. Y., Tom, K., Whipple, A., & Si, L. (2011). A comparison of two mathematics problem-solving strategies: Facilitate algebra-readiness. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.487080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., & Xin, Y. P. (2012). A follow-up meta-analysis for word-problem-solving interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.627397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., Flynn, L. J., & Swanson, H. L. (2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem solving and math disabilities: A selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712444277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhu, N. (2015). Cognitive strategy instruction for mathematical word problem-solving of students with mathematics disabilities in China. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(6), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1077935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar