Examining the Impact of a First Grade Whole Number Intervention by Group Size

References

• Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/271083
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, J., Tindal, G., Ulmer, K., & Glasgow, A. (2006). easyCBM online progress monitoring assessment system. University of Oregon. http://easycbm.com
   Google Scholar
• Anders, Y., Rossbach, H.-G., Weinert, S., Ebert, S., Kuger, S., Lehrl, S., & von Maurice, J. (2012). Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., Duncan, G. J., Odgers, C. L., & Yu, W. (2017). Persistence and fadeout in the impacts of child and adolescent interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1232459
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. H., Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., Geary, D. C., & Fuchs, D. (2020). Prevention: Necessary but insufficient? A 2-year follow-up of an effective first-grade mathematics intervention. Child Development, 91(2), 382–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. K., Gersten, R. M., & Lee, D.-S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low- achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/499715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. A., Bauer, D. J., Stice, E., & Rohde, P. (2011). Evaluating models for partially clustered designs. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., Sterba, S. K., & Hallfors, D. D. (2008). Evaluating group-based interventions when control participants are ungrouped. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170802034810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Levy, R. A., & Field, S. A. (2018). Using small-group instruction to improve students' reading fluency: An evaluation of the existing research. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 34(1), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2017.1328628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A., Severson, H., Ary, D., Faller, C., Gallison, C., Thompson, R., Glasgow, R., & Lichtenstein, E. (1987). Do smoking prevention programs really work? Attrition and the internal and external validity of an evaluation of a refusal skills training program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R. M., Scammacca, N., & Chavez, M. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of Tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507309712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannenstiel, K. H., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00066
   Google Scholar
• Chhin, C. S., Taylor, K. A., & Wei, W. S. (2018). Supporting a culture of replication: An examination of education and special education research grants funded by the institute of education sciences. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 594–605. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18788047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Cil, G., Smolkowski, K., Sutherland, M., Turtura, J., Doabler, C. T., Fien, H., & Baker, S. K. (in press). Examining the cost effectiveness of a kindergarten mathematics: Implications for practice and policy. School Psychology Review.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., & Smolkowski, K. (2012–2016). A randomized control trial of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention (Project No R324A120304, awarded $3,338,552). USDE; Institute of Education Sciences; Special Education Research, CFDA No. 84.324A. http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1327
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C., Fien, H., & Smolkowski, K. (2016–2020). A randomized control trial of a Tier 2 first grade mathematics intervention (Project No R324A160046, awarded $3,498,258). Institute of Education Sciences (IES): Special Education Research. NCSER-Mathematics, Efficacy and Replication, Goal 3, CFDA No. 84.324. http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1815
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Kosty, D., Kurtz Nelson, E., Smolkowski, K., Fien, H., & Turtura, J. (2017). Testing the efficacy of a kindergarten mathematics intervention by small group size. AERA Open, 3(2), 233285841770689–233285841770616. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417706899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C., Smolkowski, K., Kurtz Nelson, E., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., & Kosty, D. (2016). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(4), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1116034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Strand Cary, M., Kosty, D. B., Baker, S. K., Fien, H., & Smolkowski, K. (2014). Preliminary evaluation of a tier-2 mathematics intervention for first grade students: Utilizing a theory of change to guide formative evaluation activities. School Psychology Review, 43(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Turtura, J., Smolkowski, K., Kosty, D., Sutherland, M., Kurtz Nelson, E., Fien, H., & Baker, S. K. (2020). Examining the efficacy of a kindergarten mathematics intervention by group size and initial skill: Implications for practice and policy. The Elementary School Journal, 121(1), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1086/710041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Gersten, R. M., Dimino, J., & Rolfhus, E. (2011). Assessing student proficiency of number sense (ASPENS) [Measurement instrument]. Cambium Learning Group, Sopris Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Codding, R. S., & Lane, K. L. (2015). A spotlight on treatment intensity: An important and often overlooked component of intervention inquiry. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9210-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, Advanced Online Publication, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., Cook, B. G., & Therrien, W. J. (2016). Recommendations for replication research in special education: A framework of systematic, conceptual replications. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFouw, E. R., Codding, R. S., Collier-Meek, M. A., & Gould, K. M. (2019). Examining dimensions of treatment intensity and treatment fidelity in mathematics intervention research for students at risk. Remedial and Special Education, 40(5), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518774801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., Baker, S. K., Kosty, D. B., Smolkowski, K., Clarke, B., Miller, S. J., & Fien, H. (2015). Examining the association between explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 115(3), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/679969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., & Clarke, B. (2012). Quality of explicit mathematics instruction [Unpublished observation instrument]. Center on Teaching and Learning, University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., Kosty, D., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., & Fien, H. (2016). The effects of a core kindergarten mathematics program on the mathematics achievement of Spanish-speaking English learners. School Psychology Review, 45(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-3.343-361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., Kosty, D., Kurtz-Nelson, E., Fien, H., Smolkowski, K., & Baker, S. K. (2019). Examining the impact of group size on the treatment intensity of a Tier 2 mathematics intervention within a systematic framework of replication. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418789376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., Kosty, D., Turtura, J. E., Sutherland, M., Maddox, S. A., & Smolkowski, K. (2021). Using direct observation to document “practice-based evidence” of evidence-based mathematics instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420911375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., Nelson, N. J., Stoolmiller, M. L., & Baker, S. K. (2015–2017). Exploring alterable variables in Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruction: A collaboration across interdisciplinary fields of observational research (Project CIFOR (Project No R305A150037, awarded $699,706)). US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center of Education Research, Effective Teachers and Effective Teaching, CFDA No. 84.305A.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2013). A number sense intervention for low-income kindergartners at risk for mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, M., Claessens, A., Watts, T., & Farkas, G. (2016). Mathematics content coverage and student learning in kindergarten. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, E. M., & Bickman, L. (1996). An evaluator’s guide to detecting attrition problems. Evaluation Review, 20(6), 695–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9602000603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, D., Baroody, A. J., Burchinal, M., Carver, S. M., Jordan, N. C., & McDowell, J. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide (No. NCEE 2014-4005). National Center for Education and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/early_math_pg_111313.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Malone, A. S. (2018). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918758166
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Newman-Gonchar, R., Schumacher Robin, F., Dougherty, B., Bucka, N., Karp, K., Woodward, J., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R. M., Jayanthi, M., Keating, B., & Morgan, S. T. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades (WWC No. 2021006). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/WWC2021006-Math-PG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R. M., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., March, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (Practice Guide Report No. NCEE 2009-4060). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R. M., & Chard, D. J. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903300102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability- Third edition (TEMA-3). ProEd.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., & Donaldson, S. I. (1993). Evaluating interventions with differential attrition: The importance of nonresponse mechanisms and use of follow-up data. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 119–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, S., Case, R., & Siegler, R. S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 24–49). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, P. J., & Murray, D. M. (1996). Gauss or Bernoulli?: A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level. Evaluation Review, 20(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9602000306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J. (1999). Dealing with baseline differences: Two principles and two dilemmas. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 31(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(98)00048-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M., & Belfield, C. (2015). Guiding the development and use of cost-effectiveness analysis in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.915604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B., Vaughn, S., & Freund, L. (2014). Learning disabilities research studies: Findings from NICHD funded projects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.927251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Who is at risk for persistent mathematics difficulties in the United States? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414553849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2019). Results from the 2019 mathematics and reading assessments (NCES No. 2020012). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics?grade=4
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Mathematics Learning Study Committee.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, The Institute of Education Sciences, & U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Companion guidelines on replication & reproducibility in education research: A supplement to the common guidelines for education research and development. National Science Foundation, The Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/pdf/CompanionGuidelinesReplicationReproducibility.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G., & McMaster, K. L. (2019). The effects of early numeracy interventions for students in preschool and early elementary: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., & Roberts, S. A. (2005). Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment. Clinical Trials, 2(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774505cn076oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfhus, E., Gersten, R., Clarke, B., Decker, L. E., Wilkins, C., & Dimino, J. (2012). An evaluation of “number rockets”: A tier-2 intervention for grade 1 students at risk for difficulties in mathematics (Final Report No. NCEE 2012-4007). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED529429
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (2016). Base SAS® 9.4 procedures guide: Statistical procedures (5th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., Guberman, S. R., Gearhart, M., Gelman, R., Massey, C. M., & Rogoff, B. (1987). Social processes in early number development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 52(2), i–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolkowski, K., & Gunn, B. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Classroom Observations of Student-Teacher Interactions (COSTI) for kindergarten reading instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, S., & Jitendra, A. K. (2013). An exploratory study of a number sense program to develop kindergarten students' number proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411422380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belle, G. (2008). Statistical rules of thumb (2nd ed.). Jon Wiley & sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. D., Barth, A., Romain, M., & Francis, D. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Pedrotty Bryant, D., Dickson, S. V., & Blozis, S. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240050501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Swanson, E. A. (2015). Special education research advances knowledge in education. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598781
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). Procedures handbook version 4.0. Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_v4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. J., Dehaene, S., Dubois, O., & Fayol, M. (2009). Effects of an adaptive game intervention on accessing number sense in low-socioeconomic-status kindergarten children. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(4), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, B., & Clarke, B. (2015). Focus on inclusive education: Benefits of using a multi-tiered system of supports to improve inclusive practices. Childhood Education, 91(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2015.1047315
   Google Scholar