Improving Children’s Understanding of Mathematical Equivalence: An Efficacy Study

References

• Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.35.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J., Hattikudur, S., McNeil, N. M., & Stephens, A. C. (2007). A longitudinal examination of middle school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701360902
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., Phillips, K. M., & Fischer, A. D. (2009). Learning new problem-solving strategies leads to changes in problem representation. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., Bajwa, N. P., & Eiland, M. (2009). Why can’t Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 69–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children’s understanding of the “equals” sign. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/461356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J.-S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Stroud, R., Stephens, A., Gardiner, A. M., Stylianou, D. A., Knuth, E., Isler-Baykal, I., & Strachota, S. (2019). Does early algebra matter? the effectiveness of an early algebra intervention in grades 3 to 5. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1930–1972. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219832301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 980–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. E., McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., & Matthews, P. G. (2015). A specific misconception of the equal sign acts as a barrier to children’s learning of early algebra. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (2020a). Facts about English learners in California – CalEdFacts. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/cefelfacts.asp.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (2020b). Fingertip facts on education in California – CalEdFacts. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/ceffingertipfacts.asp/
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (2020c). State performance overview: State of California. https://www.caschooldashboard.org/reports/ca/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Social and metacognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, R. I. (2005). Big ideas and understandings as the foundation for elementary and middle school mathematics. National Council for Supervisors of Mathematics: Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 8(2), 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Petersen, L. A., & Dunwiddie, A. E. (2018). Arithmetic practice that includes relational words promotes understanding of symbolic equations. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Falk, B. (2013). Teacher learning through assessment: How student performance assessments can support teacher learning (Tech. Rep.). Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/TeacherLearning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Denmark, T., Barco, E., & Voran, J. (1976). Final report: A teaching experiment on equality. (PMDC Technical Report no. 6). Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(4), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.6.4.0232
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (1998). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D., & Noyce, P. (2004). The mathematics assessment collaborative: Performance testing to improve instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., & Brown, S. A. (2018). Feedback influences children’s reasoning about math equivalence: A meta-analytic review. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1359208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., Byers, C., & Nelson, L. J. (2022). The benefits of a metacognitive lesson on children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence, arithmetic, and place value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1292–1306. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., Matthews, P. G., & Amsel, E. (2020). College developmental math students’ knowledge of the equal sign. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09947-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., Matthews, P. G., Amsel, E., McEldoon, K. L., & McNeil, N. M. (2018). Assessing formal knowledge of math equivalence among algebra and pre-algebra students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., & Borjas, S. (2015). Benefits of “concreteness fading” for children’s mathematics understanding. Learning and Instruction, 35, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A. M., De Lisi, R., Holst, P. C., McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Morely, M., & Cahalan, C. (2000). Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75(3), 165–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 69–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K. (2002). Preamble: From models to modeling. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 7–22). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hattikudur, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). Learning about the equal sign: Does comparing with inequality symbols help? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40539304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., & Chin, M. (2018). Connections between teachers’ knowledge of students, instruction, and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1076–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218769614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornburg, C. B., Brletic-Shipley, H., Matthews, J. M., & McNeil, N. M. (2021). Improving understanding of mathematical equivalence. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 114(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2020.0109.
   Google Scholar
• Hornburg, C. B., Devlin, B. L., & McNeil, N. M. (2022). Earlier understanding of mathematical equivalence in elementary school predicts greater algebra readiness in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornburg, C. B., Rieber, M. L., & McNeil, N. M. (2017). An integrative data analysis of gender differences in children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 163, 140–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., & Cui, J. (2020). The condition of education 2020. NCES 2020-144. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020144.rev.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 258–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Dowens, M. (2012). Substitution and sameness: Two components of a relational conception of the equals sign. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Ding, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children’s understandings of mathematical equality: Comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in china and the United States. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000801980845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless, T. (2008). The misplaced math student: Lost in eighth-grade algebra. The 2008 Brown Center report on American education (special release). Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. (2000). A longitudinal assessment of antecedent course work in mathematics and subsequent mathematical attainment. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathematics Assessment Resource Service. (2004). Tools for teachers: Grade 2. http://www.svmimac.org.
   Google Scholar
• Mathematics Assessment Resource Service. (2007). Tools for teachers: Grade 2, Part 3. http://www.svmimac.org
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (2020). Keys to the gate? equal sign knowledge at second grade predicts fourth-grade algebra competence. Child Development, 91(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M. (2007). U-shaped development in math: 7-Year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M. (2008). Limitations to teaching children 2 + 2= 4: Typical arithmetic problems can hinder learning of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 79(5), 1524–1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01203.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M. (2014). A “change–resistance” account of children’s difficulties understanding mathematical equivalence. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Learning mathematics from procedural instruction: Externally imposed goals influence what is learned. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 734–744. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). You’ll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005a). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005b). Why won’t you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76(4), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00884.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., Matthews, P. G., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Wheeler, M. C. (2012). It pays to be organized: Organizing arithmetic practice around equivalent values facilitates understanding of math equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., & Dunwiddie, A. E. (2015). Arithmetic practice can be modified to promote understanding of mathematical equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Brletic-Shipley, H. (2011). Benefits of practicing 4 = 2+ 2: Nontraditional problem formats facilitate children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 82(5), 1620–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. C., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D. E. (2006). Middle-school students’ understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can’t help. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Hornburg, C. B., Brletic-Shipley, H., & Matthews, J. M. (2019). Improving children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence via an intervention that goes beyond nontraditional arithmetic practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1023–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Hornburg, C. B., Devlin, B. L., Carrazza, C., & McKeever, M. O. (2019). Consequences of individual differences in children’s formal understanding of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 90(3), 940–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Hornburg, C. B., Fuhs, M. W., & O'Rear, C. D. (2017). Understanding children’s difficulties with mathematical equivalence. In D. C. Geary, D. B. Berch, R. J. Ochsendorf, & K. Mann Koepke (Eds.), Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 167–195). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mickey, K. W., & McClelland, J. L. (2014). A neural network model of learning mathematical equivalence. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1012–1017). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M. (1991). Learning and transfer: Instructional conditions and conceptual change. Cognitive Development, 6(4), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(91)90049-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3(4), 359–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(88)90021-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R. (2012). Equations and the equal sign in elementary mathematics textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 112(4), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1086/665009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 381–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ready, D. D., LoGerfo, L. F., Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (2005). Explaining girls’ advantage in kindergarten literacy learning: Do classroom behaviors make a difference? The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/496905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, E. (1932). Children’s misconceptions concerning the symbols for mathematical equality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1932.tb02743.x
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: The effects of direct instruction and self-explanation. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other. ? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N., Fall, A.-M., Capin, P., Roberts, G., & Swanson, E. (2020). Examining factors affecting reading and math growth and achievement gaps in grades 1–5: A cohort-sequential longitudinal approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 718–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic: From children’s ideas to classroom practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Zevin, J. D. (2006). Connectionist models in developmental cognitive neuroscience: Critical periods and the paradox of success. In Y. Munakata & M. Johnson (Eds.), Attention and performance, XXI: Processes of change in brain and cognitive development (pp. 315–347). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: Benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silla, E. M., Hornburg, C. B., Kloser, M., & McNeil, N. M. (2020). Research-based teaching practices for improving students’ understanding of mathematical equivalence have not made it into elementary classrooms [Paper presentation]. In S. Denison, M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B. C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 2937–2943). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). National assessment of educational progress, 2019 mathematics assessment. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• United States Education Code. (2011). 20 U.S.C. §1067k. definitions. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title20/html/USCODE-2011-title20-chap28-subchapIII-partE-subpart3-sec1067k.htm.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences. (2012). Elementary school mathematics evidence review protocol v2.0. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Document/21.
   Google Scholar