Accelerating Literacy for Adolescents (ALFA): Evaluating ALFA Lab Using a Regression Discontinuity Study

References

• Ackerman, B. P. (1986). Referential and causal coherence in the story comprehension of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACT. (2019). The condition of college & career readiness 2019. Retrieved October 29, 2022, from https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/National-CCCR-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Albright, L. K. (2002). Bringing the Ice Maiden to life: Engaging adolescents in learning through picture book read-alouds in content areas. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(5), 418–428. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40012231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALFA LAB. (2023). ALFA lab: Accelerating Literacy for Adolescents: The Accelerating Literacy For Adolescents or ALFA lab builds and strengthens literacy skills necessary to help students become successful, life-long readers and writers. Retrieved April 2, 2024, from https://alfa.every1graduates.org
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame’enui, E. J., & Olejnik, S. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baye, A., Inns, A., Lake, C., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). A synthesis of quantitative research on reading programs for secondary students. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 133–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved February 9, 2018, from https://media.carnegie.org/filer_public/b7/5f/b75fba81-16cb-422d-ab59-373a6a07eb74/ccny_report_2004_reading.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy (2nd ed.). Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved February 9, 2018, from https://all4ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ReadingNext.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., & Gülgöz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., & Titiunik, R. (2020). Rdrobust: Robust data-driven statistical inference in regression-discontinuity designs (R Package version 0.99.8). Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rdrobust/rdrobust.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295–2326. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D., Titiunik, R., & Vazquez-Bare, G. (2019). Power calculations for regression-discontinuity designs. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 19(1), 210–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X19830919
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., & Ma, X. (2022). lpdensity: Local polynomial density estimation and inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 101(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v101.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2022). Regression discontinuity designs. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 821–851. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-021409
   Google Scholar
• Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review [Working paper]. MDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., Wang, W., Kingston, N. M., Hock, M., Tonks, S. M., & Tiemann, G, Tiemann. (2020). A computer adaptive measure of reading motivation. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(4), 434–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deke, J., & Dragoset, L. (2012). Statistical power for regression discontinuity designs in education: Empirical estimates of design effects relative to randomized controlled trials. Mathematica Policy Research Working Paper. Retrieved February 14, 2024, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533141.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deke, J., Finucane, M., & Thal, D. (2022). The BASIE (BAyeSian Interpretation of Estimates) framework for interpreting findings from impact evaluations: A practical guide for education researchers. (NCEE 2022-005). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, M., Clemens, N., Simmons, D., Anderson, L., Davis, J., Smith, A., Wang, H., Kwok, O., Simmons, L. E., & Oslund, E. (2017). Impact of a technology-mediated reading intervention on adolescents’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1227412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford-Connors, E., & Paratore, J. R. (2015). Vocabulary instruction in fifth grade and beyond: Sources of word learning and productive contexts for development. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 50–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., Uekawa, K., Falk, A., Bloom, H., Doolittle, F., Zhu, P., & Sztejnberg, L. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE 2008-4030). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from, http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20084030.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308203
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_1
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949377
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2011). PIRLS 2011 Student Questionnaire, Grade 4. Retrieved June 9, 2014, from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/downloads/P11_StuQ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldi, S., Filippatou, S., & Govaris, C. (2011). Project based learning in primary schools: Effects on pupils’ learning and attitudes. Education 3-13, 39(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903179538
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A Practice Guide (NCEE 2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/docs/practiceguide/adlit_pg_082608.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kingery, E. M. (2000). Teaching metacognitive strategies to enhance higher-level thinking in adolescents. In P. E. Linder, E. G. Sturtevant, W. M. Linek, & J. R. Dugan (Eds.), Literacy at a new horizon (pp. 74–85). College Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Kuhfeld, M., Ruzek, E., & McEachin, A. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: Reading and math achievement in the 2020-21 school year. Center for School and Student Progress. Retrieved November 20, 2022, from https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/learning-during-covid-19-reading-and-math-achievement-in-the-2020-2021-school-year
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
   Google Scholar
• Mac Iver, D., Davis, M., Mac Iver, M., Zhang, X., Schoeneberger, J., & Spinney, S. (2023). Accelerating Literacy for Adolescents (ALFA) Lab Regression Discontinuity Evaluation. [Data set]. OPENICPSR. https://doi.org/10.3886/E190621V1
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking comprehension instruction: Comparing strategies and content instructional approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinstery, J., & Topping, K. J. (2003). Cross-age peer tutoring of thinking skills in the high school. Educational Psychology in Practice, 19(3), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266736032000109465
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Nation’s Report Card. (2019). 2019 NAEP reading assessment: Highlighted results at grade 12 for the nation. Retrieved June 10, 2021, from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2019/g12/
   Google Scholar
• The Nation’s Report Card. (2022). NAEP report card: 2022 NAEP reading assessment. Retrieved August 31, 2023, from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2022/
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, K. R., Larkin, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perie, M., Moran, R., & Lutkus, A. D. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics (NCES 2005–464). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved September 13, 2011, from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2005/2005464.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, K., & Berkeley, S. (2012). Effective reading and writing instruction: A focus on modeling. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47(5), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211430117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaissance Learning. (2023). Star Reading technical manual. Retrieved from: https://renaissance.widen.net/view/pdf/xutuykoglg/SRRPTechnicalManual.pdf?t.download=true&u=zceria
   Google Scholar
• Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhouse, J., Feitelson, D., Kita, B., & Goldstein, Z. (1997). Interactive reading aloud to Israeli first graders: Its contribution to literacy development. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.32.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholastic, Inc. (2019). Kids and family reading report, 7th edition: Finding their story. Retrieved November 21, 2022, https://www.scholastic.com/content/dam/KFRR/Downloads/KFRReport_Finding%20Their%20Story.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1992). Influence of reading-comprehension strategy information on children’s achievement outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and non-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Galindo, R., Wong, V. C., Steiner, P. M., & Cook, T. D. (2011). A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Vancil, S. J. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. Reading Teacher, 40(1), 62–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20199306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. J. (2003). Student team reading and writing: A cooperative learning approach to middle school literacy instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.9.2.137.14212
   Google Scholar
• Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2019). Trends in U.S. adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. (2021). Education in a pandemic: The disparate impacts of COVID-19 on America’s students. Retrieved April 10, 2022, from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/20210608-impacts-of-covid19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). PIRLS 2021 U.S. highlights web report. Retrieved June 9, 2023, from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/pirls2021/index.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. (1999). Content area reading. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook [version 5.0]. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). Retrieved January 4, 2024, from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/Final_WWC-HandbookVer5.0-0-508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar