The Human–Canine Bond: A Sacred Relationship

References

• Antonacopoulos, N. M. D., & Pychyl, T. A. (2010). An examination of the potential role of pet ownership, human social support and pet attachment in the psychological health of individuals living alone. Anthrozoös, 23(1), 37–54. doi:10.2752/175303710X12627079939143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. M., & Katcher, A. H. (2003). Future directions in human-animal bond research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 79–93. doi:10.1177/0002764203255214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., & Shen-Miller, D. (Eds.). (2011). The psychology of the human-animal bond: A resource for clinicians and researchers. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, S. (2009). The meaning of American pet cemetery gravestones. Ethnology, 48(2), 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, L. A., Leonard, H. A., & Scammon, D. L. (2008). A tail of two personalities: How canine companions shape relationships and well-being. Journal of Business Research, 61, 469–479. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chur-Hansen, A., McArthur, M., Winefield, H., Hanieh, E., & Hazel, S. (2014). Animal-assisted interventions in children’s hospitals: A critical review of the literature. Anthrozoös, 27(1), 5–18. doi:10.2752/175303714X13837396326251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chur-Hansen, A., Stern, C., & Winefield, H. (2010). Gaps in the evidence about companion animals and human health: Some suggestions for progress. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 8, 140–146. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00176.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, S. P. (2002). Can pets function as family members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 621–638. doi:10.1177/019394502320555386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordaro, M. (2012). Pet loss and disenfranchised grief: Implications for mental health counseling practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 34(4), 283–294. doi:10.17744/mehc.34.4.41q0248450t98072
   Google Scholar
• Coren, S. (2008). The modern dog. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, D. (2000). The pet relationship impact inventory. The Family Journal, 8(2), 192–198. doi:10.1177/1066480700082015
   Google Scholar
• Faver, C. A. (2009). Seeking our place in the web of life: Animals and human spirituality. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 28, 362–378. doi:10.1080/15426430903263161
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (2006). Animal behaviours, post-human lives: Everyday negotiations of the animal–human divide in pet-keeping. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 525–537. doi:10.1080/14649360600825679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. (2006). “Be[a]ware of the dog”: A post-humanist approach to housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(3), 137–156. doi:10.1080/14036090600813760
   Google Scholar
• Grandin, T., & Johnson, C. (2009). Animals make us human. New York, NY: Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greenebaum, J. (2004). It’s a dog’s life: Elevating status from pet to “fur baby” at yappy hour. Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 12(2), 117–135. doi:10.1163/1568530041446544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. C. (1994). Consumers and their animal companions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 616–632. doi:10.1086/jcr.1994.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., & Edwards, V. (2008). In the company of wolves: The physical, social, and psychological benefits of dog ownership. Journal of Aging and Health, 20(4), 437–455. doi:10.1177/0898264308315875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, D. A. (2012). Therapy dogs in cancer care: A valuable complementary treatment. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, C., & Fook, J. (2005). The importance of pet loss and some implications for services. Mortality, 10(2), 127–143. doi:10.1080/13576270412331329849
   Google Scholar
• Power, E. (2008). Furry families: Making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535–555. doi:10.1080/14649360802217790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, E. R. (2013). Dogs and practices of community and neighboring. Anthrozoös, 26(4), 579–591. doi:10.2752/175303713X13795775536011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putney, J. M. (2013). Relational ecology: A theoretical framework for understanding the human-animal bond. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40(4), 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1404–1413. doi:10.1177/1049732312450368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, S., Wallace, H., & Anderson, T. (2008). Reasons for companion animal guardianship (pet ownership) from two populations. Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 16(3), 279–291. doi:10.1163/156853008X323411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, E. B. (2004). Interparental conflict and youth maladjustment: The buffering effects of pets. Stress, Trauma, and Crisis, 7, 151–168. doi:10.1080/15434610490500071
   Google Scholar
• Turner, W. G. (2005). The role of companion animals throughout the family life cycle. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 11–21. doi:10.1300/J039v09n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.2013.15.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, F. (2009a). Human–animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals. Family Process, 48(4), 462–480. doi:10.1111/famp.2009.48.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, F. (2009b). Human–animal bonds II: The role of pets in family systems and family therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 481–499. doi:10.1111/famp.2009.48.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar