Human Rights Policies, Guidelines, and Standards in The Private Security Industry: A Scoping Review

References

• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreopoulos, G., & Brandle, S. (2012). Revisiting the role of private military and security companies. Criminal Justice Ethics, 31(3), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2012.743339
   Google Scholar
• Aoul, S. K., Revil, É., Sarrasin, B., Campbell, B., & Tougas, D. (2000). Towards a spiral of violence? “The Dangers of Privatising Risk Management of Investments in Africa” mining activities and the use of private security companies. Development and Peace, and Mining Watch Canada, Montreal, PQ. https://www.cedim.uqam.ca/IMG/pdf/spiral_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Archard, D. (2004). Welfare rights as human rights and the duties of organisations. In T. Campbell (Ed.), /Human rights and the moral responsibilities of corporate and public sector organisations (pp. 45–59). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Arnpriester, N. (2016). Combating impunity: The private military industry, human rights, and the legal gap. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 38, 1189–1240.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D. (2004). The privatization of security and change in the control of force. International Studies Perspectives, 5(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00165.x
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D., & Neu, K. K. (2019). The private security events database. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(8), 1986–2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718824394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, S. D., & Pereira, V. (2014). Corporate human rights responsibility and multinationality in emerging markets–A legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 9(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2014.062770
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, R. (2012). Human rights in ancient Rome. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann-Pauly, D., & Nolan, J. (2016). Business and human rights: From principles to practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, D. (2015). Human rights in policing: a global assessment. Policing and Society, 25(5), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.895352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, M. D. (2020). What democratic policing is… and is not. Policing and Society, 30(9), 1044–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1649405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, H., Caparini, M., Cole, E., & Scherrer, V. (2007). Regulating private security in Europe: Status and prospects. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
   Google Scholar
• Brummer, C. (2010). Why soft law dominates international finance—and not trade. Journal of International Economic Law, 13(3), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgq026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnee, J., & Toope, S. J. (2012). Constructivist approach to international law. In J. L. Dunoff & M. A. Pollack (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations. The State of the Art (pp 119–145). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzatu, A. M. (2020). Global cybersecurity and the private sector. In Routledge handbook of international cybersecurity (pp. 312–325). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R., & Handley, L. (2020). Evaluating national preventive mechanisms: a conceptual model. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(2), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, A. T. (2017). Consent decrees and police reform: A piece of the puzzle or a puzzling policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S., & Fisher, A. (Eds.) (2009). Private security, public order: The outsourcing of public services and its limits (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S., & Lehnardt, C. (Eds.), (2007). From mercenaries to market: The rise and regulation of private military companies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chirwa, D. M. (2004). The doctrine of state responsibility as a potential means of holding private actors accountable for human rights. Melbourne. Journal of International Law, 5, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, B. (2018). Balancing soft and hard law for business and human rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 67(4), 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589318000155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockayne, J. (2008). Regulating private military and security companies: The content, negotiation, weaknesses and promise of the Montreux Document. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krp006
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. (2020). Private military security companies: addressing accountability–a suggested model for control. In. C. Fournat, H. Cullen, & S. Richmond (Eds.), The politics of international criminal law (pp. 279–313). Brill Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Daza, F. (2017). Delimitation and presence of PMSCs: Impact on human rights. InC. Lopez (Ed.), Private military and security companies and human rights (pp. 31–57). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DCAF. (2015). Regulating private military and security companies. The Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct.
   Google Scholar
• DCAF. (2020). Regulating the use of force by private security providers - a guidance tool for states. https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/DCAF_Toolkit_Use%20of%20Force.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DCAF. (2021). Tool 7: Non-state justice and security providers and security sector reform; Do No Harm Outline; Behavioral Changes; Stakeholder Analysis. https://www.dcaf.ch/tool-7-non-state-justice-and-security-providers-and-security-sector-reform
   Google Scholar
• DCAF. (2022). Addressing security and human rights challenges in complex environments: A practical toolkit. https://www.securityhumanrightshub.org/toolkit/pdf/ashrc-toolkit_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DCAF. (2023). Hybrid security: Challenges and opportunities for security sector reform. https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/DCAF_Hybrid-Security-Study_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Wolf, K. D. (2011). Business in zones of conflict: an emergent corporate security responsibility?. InN. Deitelhoff, & K. D. Wolf (Eds.). The business of human rights: An evolving agenda for corporate responsibility (pp. 202–226). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deva, S. (2012). Regulating corporate human rights violations: Humanizing business. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diggs, E., Regan, M., & Parance, B. (2019). Business and human rights as galaxy of norms. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 50(2), 309–362.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etkin, B. (2021). The cynic’s guide to compliance: A constructivist theory of the contestation threshold in human rights. Revue Québécoise de Droit International, 183–203. https://doi.org/10.7202/1079428ar
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, T. M. (1998). Fairness in international law and institutions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, B., & Uriz, G. H. (2017). Managing risk and building trust: the challenge of implementing the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights. In Sullivan (Ed.), Business and human rights (pp. 243–259). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, M. (2008). Global ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and international relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garmany, J., & Galdeano, A. P. (2018). Crime, insecurity and corruption: Considering the growth of urban private security. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017732691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germeaux, A. (2022). The role of law in international relations. In The international legal order in global governance: Norms, power and policy (pp. 103–227). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gheciu, A. (2018). Security entrepreneurs: Performing protection in post-cold war Europe. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). GRI 410: Security Practices From gri-410-security-practices-2016.pdf (globalreporting.org).
   Google Scholar
• Goodhart, M. E. (Ed.). (2016). Human rights: Politics and practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimheden, J. (2018). Civil litigation in response to corporate human rights abuse: the European Union and its Member States. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 50(1), 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, C. I., Marchant, G., & Tournas, L. (2020). Lessons for artificial intelligence from historical uses of soft law governance. Jurimetrics, 61(1), 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, K. A. (2009). Justice, Intervention, and Force in International Relations: Reassessing Just War = Theory in the 21st century. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iancu, A. (2020). The bridging capacity of realist constructivism: The normative evolution of human security and the responsibility to protect. In S. J. Barkin (Ed.), The social construction of state power (pp. 171–192). Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, S., Gardner, L., & Weinberger, S. (2017). The ‘Canada Brand’: Violence and Canadian Mining Companies in Latin America. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17/2017. From https://ssrn.com/abstract=2886584 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2886584
   Google Scholar
• International Code of Conduct. (2021). The international code of conduct for private security service providers. https://icoca.ch/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/INTERNATIONAL-CODE-OF-CONDUCT_Amended_2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of the Red Cross. (2013). The montreux document on pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for states related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflicts. https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/foreign-policy/international-law/international-humanitarian-law/private-military-security-companies/montreux-document.html
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of the Red Cross. (2017). A contract guidance tool for private military and security services. https://www.montreuxdocument.org/pdf/contract-guidance-tool.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. (2008). Shadow force: Private security contractors in Iraq. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ishay, M. (2004). What are human rights? Six historical controversies. Journal of Human Rights, 3(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475483042000224897
   Google Scholar
• Jha, V. (2021). ‘Soft Law in a Hard Shell’: India, International Rulemaking and the International Solar Alliance. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(3), 517–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonathan, D. (2006). Constructivist theories. In J. C. Thomas & D. S. Segal (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology, personality and everyday functioning (pp. 212–232). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kamruzzaman, M., & Das, S. K. (2016). The evaluation of human rights: An overview in historical perspective. American Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(2), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kees, A. (2011). Regulation of private military companies. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 3, 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J. (2020). The prospects of human rights in US–China relations: a constructivist understanding. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 20(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontos, A. P. (2004). Private security guards: privatized force and state responsibility under international human rights law. Non-State Actors and International Law, 4(3), 199–238. https://doi.org/10.1163/1571807042794636
   Google Scholar
• Lagoutte, S., Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., & Cerone, J. (2016). Tracing the Roles of soft law in human rights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, M., & Rhoads, E. P. (2020). Constructivism. In K. Oksamytna & J. Karlsruld (Eds.), United Nations peace operations and international relations theory (pp. 111–128). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lepard, B. D. (2012). International law and human rights. In T. Cushman (Ed.), Handbook of human rights (pp. 583–597). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liss, C. (2014). The privatisation of maritime security in Southeast Asia: the impact on regional security cooperation. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.831810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, D. (2007). Promoting democracy: the challenge of creating a civil society. Comparative Sociology, 6(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913307X216295
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, S., & Dewinter-Schmitt, R. (2019). Certifying private security companies: Effectively ensuring the corporate responsibility to respect human rights? Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, M. (2022). The Sealth Industry: The Quiet Expansion of Chinese Private Security Companies. Center for Strategic & International Studies. From https://www.csis.org/analysis/stealth-industry-quiet-expansion-chinese-private-security-companies
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Ortega, O. (2014). Human rights due diligence for corporations: from voluntary standards to hard law at last? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 32(1), 44–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411403200104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, D. M. (2022). The new constructivism in international relations theory. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miake-Lye, I. M., Hempel, S., Shanman, R., & Shekelle, P. G. (2016). What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyn, S. (2014). The universal declaration of human rights of 1948 in the history of cosmopolitanism. Critical Inquiry, 40(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1086/676412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchlinski, P. (2021). The impact of the UN guiding principles on business attitudes to observing human rights. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2021.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutuma, W. K. (2016). The problem of civilian contractors that directly participate in hostilities. African Yearbook on International Humanitarian Law, 2016(1), 8–45.
   Google Scholar
• Narváez González, C., & Valencia, K. (2019). Improving human rights in the private security industry: Envisioning the role of ICoCA in Latin America. Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolle, E. (2021). Bridging the legal/ethical gap. Security Management. https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2021/09/bridging-the-legal-ethical-gap/
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. C., Woodcock, P., Kaiser, M. J., & Pullin, A. S. (2017). Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy. Environmental Evidence, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017-0096-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OHCHR (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perret, A. (2013). Privatization without regulation: The human rights risks of private military and security companies (PMSCs) in Mexico. Mexican Law Review, 6(1), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30022-1
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, B. (2006). Promoting compliance of private security and military companies with international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 88(863), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383106000713
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, K. A. (2010). Beyond the court of public opinion: military commissions and the reputational pull of compliance theory. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 42, 303–356.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, K. A. (2018). Duty and disobedience: The conflict of conscience and compliance in the Trump Era. Pepperdine Law Review, 45, 55–148.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimenta, C. L. R., Rónay, Z., & Németh, A. (2021). Centralisation and Decentralisation in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Hungary and Germany. Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 93(8), 1119–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, C. (2011). Voluntary principles on security and human rights. In T. Hale & D. Held (Eds.), Handbook of transnational governance (pp 357–363). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, C. (2016). The United Nations ‘protect, respect, remedy framework and guiding principles. In Baumann-Pauly, D. & Nolan, J. (Eds.), Business and human rights (pp. 51–63). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prem, B. (2019). Private military and security companies as legitimate governors: From Barricades to boardrooms. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., & Slaughter, A. M. (2002). International law, international relations and compliance. InW. Carlnaes, T. Risse & B. Summons (Eds.), International relations and compliance (pp 538–558). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Reinisch, A., & Gianviti, F. (2005). Non-state actors and human rights In P. Alston (Ed.), Non-State actors and human rights (pp 37–89). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, L. (2020). Human rights, those who are governed and the legitimacy of law enforcement. Comparative Civilizations Review, 82(82), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rigakos, G. S. (2016). The new parapolice. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Innovations: Technology| Governance| Globalization, 3(2), 189–212.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and human rights: the evolving international agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000037738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarikkomäki, E., & Lampela, P. (2022). Improving private security–youth relations in quasi-public spaces: control, care, cooperation. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 46(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1899000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabia, R. (2021). The Accountability of Multinational Companies for Human Rights Violations, Regulatory Trends and New Punitive Approaches Across Europe. European Criminal Law Review, 11(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2021-1-36
   Google Scholar
• Sarelin, A. (2014). Giving meaning to human rights: An analysis of human rights discourse in Malawi. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huu001
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, M. P. (2009). International law in crisis: a qualitative empirical contribution to the compliance debate. Cardozo Law Review, 31(1), 45–98.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sklansky, D. A. (1998). The private police. UCLA Law Review, 46(4), 1165–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklansky, D. A. (2011). Private policing and human rights. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 5(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1054
   Google Scholar
• South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC). (2006c). The Sarajevo Code of Conduct for Private Security Companies Belgrade” UNDP-SEESAC, Belgrade). http://www.seesac.org/index.php?content=&page=sr&section=3
   Google Scholar
• Stenning, P. C., & Shearing, C. D. (1979). The quiet revolution: The nature, development and general legal implications of private security in Canada. Criminal Law Quarterly, 22, 220–248.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility failures in the oil industry. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(5), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510630086
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R. (2006). NGO influence on the human rights performance of companies. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 24(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410602400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubek, L. G. (2006). New governance and soft law in health care reform. Indiana Health Law Review, 3(1), 139–169. https://doi.org/10.18060/16468
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2016). UNSMS security management operation manual. https://resourcecenter.undac.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Guidance.Security-Management-Operations-Manual-SMOM-E-Book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2017). United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS) security policy manual. undss-security_policy_manual_e-book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). Office of drugs and crime handbook on the use of force by private security companies: Annex B to maritime crime. Global Maritime Crime Programme. For maritime private security providers. https://www.unodc.org/documents/Maritime_crime/19-02086_Private_Security_Company_Handbook_Maritime
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2022). Revised second draft instrument on an international regulatory framework on the regulation, monitoring of and oversight over the activities of private military and security companies. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/wgmilitary/2022-11-03/PMSCs-Second-Draft%20-Instrument-Clean.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Verdier, P. H., & Stephan, P. B. (2021). International human rights and multinational corporations: An FCPA approach. Boston University Law Review, 101, 1359–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, A. (2002). The public surveillance functions of private security. Surveillance & Society, 2(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i4.3362
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F. (2010). The duty to protect: Corporate complicity, political responsibility, and human rights advocacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0447-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, N. D. (2016). Regulation of the private military and security sector: is the UK fulfilling its human rights duties? Human Rights Law Review, 16(3), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngw019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, N. D., Footer, M. E., Senior, K., van Dorp, M., Kiezebrink, V., Puraka, Y., & Anzas, A. F. (2018). Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment. Netherlands International Law Review, 65(2), 217–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-018-0107-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022). Civil Society Policy Forum (CSPF). https://www.worldbank.org/en/events/2017/04/21/civil-society-policy-forum
   Google Scholar
• Zapatero, G. V. (2019). The art of legislating. Springer.
   Google Scholar