Gender Differences in Instagram Hashtag Use

References

• An, J., & Weber, I. (2016). # greysanatomy vs. # yankees: Demographics and hashtag use on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01973. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01973
   Google Scholar
• Ayeh, J. K., Leung, D., Au, N., & Law, R. (2012). Perceptions and strategies of hospitality and tourism practitioners on social media: An exploratory study. ENTER 2012: Etourism – Present and Future Services and Applications, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Billore, S., Billore, G., & Yamaji, K. (2013). The online corporate branding of banks: A comparative content analysis of Indian and Japanese banks. Journal of American Business Review, 1(2), 90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bolwitt, R. (2010). Twitter hashtags for Vancouver 2010. Retrieved August 7, 2016, from http://www.miss604.com/2010/02/vancouver-2010-guide-to-twitter-hashtags.html
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J., Fisher, P. A., Pears, K. C., & Levine, S. (2009). Morning cortisol levels in preschool-aged foster children: Differential effects of maltreatment type. Developmental Psychobiology, 51(1), 14–23. doi:10.1002/dev.v51:1
   Google Scholar
• Choi, E., Deborah, F., Ben, G., & Yuan, J. X. (2016). Social media marketing: Applying the uses and gratifications theory in the hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(7), 771–796. doi:10.1080/19368623.2016.1100102
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C., & Tsai, M. (2007). Gender differences in Taiwan high school students’ computer game playing. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 812–824. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.011
   Google Scholar
• Daantje, D., Agneta, H. F., & Arjan, E. R. B. (2008). The role of emotion in computer mediated communication. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(1), 766–785. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Ellin, B. (2011). Introducing the follow button. Retrieved February 14, 2015, from blog.twitter.com
   Google Scholar
• Eva, G. M. (2013). Hashtag and followers: An experimental study of the online social network Twitter. Journal of Marketing Management, 31, 221–243.
   Google Scholar
• Guidry, J. D., Messner, M., Jin, Y., & Medina-Messner, V. (2015). From #Mcdonalds fail to #Dominossucks: An analysis of instagram images about the 10 largest fast food companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(3), 344–359. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014-0027
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non‐users of social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
   Google Scholar
• Hays, S., Page, S. J., & Buhalis, D. (2013). Social media as a destination marketing tool: Its use by national tourism organisations. Current Issues in Tourism, 16(3), 211–239. doi:10.1080/13683500.2012.662215
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Paolillo, J. C. (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439–459. doi:10.1111/josl.2006.10.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user type. 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 34(3), 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, D. R., & Wu, F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, B., & Kunz, W. (2012). How to transform consumers into fans of your brand. Journal of Service Management, 23(3), 344–361. doi:10.1108/09564231211248444
   Google Scholar
• Jeanine, G., Marcus, M., Yan, J., & Vivian, M. (2014). From #mcdonaldsfail to #domonossucks: An analysis of Instagram images about the 10 largest fast food companies. International Public Relations Research, 133(24), 408–414.
   Google Scholar
• John, R., & Jennifer, B. R. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Human Factors in Computing, 34(3), 264–277.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. doi:10.1086/268109
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., Hinds, P., & Pentland, A. (2012). Awareness as an antidote to distance: Making distributed groups cooperative and consistent. The ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(5), 137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang, C. H., Wong, N. L., & David, M. K. (2011). Communication mode among Malaysians. International Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Science, 1, 357–363.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J. (1994). The varieties of emotional experience: A meditation on James–Lange theory. Psychological Review, 101(2), 211–221. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S., & Wu, F. (2011). Anti-preferential attachment: If I follow you, will you follow me? 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing (socialcom), 339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2003, Retrieved July, 11, 2016). How does instant messaging affect interaction between the genders? Stanford, CA: The Mercury Project for Instant Messaging Studies At Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, D., Law, R., Van Hoof, H., & Buhalis, D. (2013). Social media in tourism and hospitality: A literature review. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(2), 3–22. doi:10.1080/10548408.2013.750919
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. G., Lavesson, N., & Doroud, M. (2016). Hashtags and followers: An experimental study of the online social network Twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(12), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0320-6
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80–98. doi:10.1177/107769900007700107
   Google Scholar
• Messina, A. (2007). Public relations, the public interest and persuasion: An ethical approach. Journal of Communication Management, 11(1), 29–52. doi:10.1108/13632540710725978
   Google Scholar
• Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2013). Trust and involvement in tourism social media and web-based travel information sources. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 23(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/15022250.2013.764511
   Google Scholar
• Mundorf, N., & Mundorf, J. (2003). Gender socialization of horror. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 155–178). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., Weaver, J. B., & Sargent, S. L. (2000). An examination of factors related to sex differences in enjoyment of sad films. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 282–300. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_8
   Google Scholar
• Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 10, 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
   Google Scholar
• Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 95–97. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9927
   Google Scholar
• Pitterman, J., Pitterman, A., & Minker, W. (2010). Handling emotions in human-computer dialogues. Utrecht, the Netherland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, A., Popescu, D., & State, C. (2016). Hashtag progress: The digital fingerprint of web 2.0 on tourism and hospitality industry management—A case study for Romania. In Bilgin M., & Danis H. (eds), Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics - Vol. 1. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 3/1. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., Brenner, J., & Purcell, K. (2012). Photos and videos as social currency online. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/09/13/photos-and-videos-as-social-currency-online/
   Google Scholar
• Redding, P. (2011). Feeling, thought and orientation: William James and the idealist anti-Cartesian tradition. Parrhesia, 13, 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, L., & Markey, P. M. (2009). The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 35–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.022
   Google Scholar
• Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2011). Influence and passivity in social media. The 20th International Conference Companion On World Wide Web, 113–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, S., Hashim, N. H., & Murphy, J. (2016). The role of information quality, visual appeal and information facilitation in restaurant selection intention. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, proceedings of ENTER 2016, Bilbao, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Savicki, V., & Kelley, M. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 817–826. doi:10.1089/10949310050191791
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. doi:10.1037/h0046234
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured?. Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. doi:10.1177/0539018405058216
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, R. (1996). Multivariate response patterning of fear and anger. Cognition & Emotion, 10(2), 173–198. doi:10.1080/026999396380321
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Wei, F., Liu, X., Zhou, M., & Zhang, M. (2011). Topic sentiment analysis in Twitter: A graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 1031–1040.
   Google Scholar
• Wendy, A., Jessie, D., Joanna, H., & Peta, H. (2013). An Instagram is worth a thousand words: An industry panel and audience Q&A. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 30(7), 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Wicker, S. B., & Kim, S. (2003). Fundamentals of codes, graphs, and iterative decoding. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yuheng, H., Lydia, M., & Subbarao, K. (2014). What we instagram: A first analysis of instagram photo content and user type. Advancement of Artificial, 36(2), 357–361.
   Google Scholar