64
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using Bayesian models to assess the capability of a manufacturing process in the presence of unobserved assignable causes

&
Pages 139-164 | Accepted 21 Mar 2016, Published online: 03 May 2016

References

  • Anis, M.Z., & Basak, I. (2013). On Cpk assessment in the presence of tool wear. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 42, 1759–1773. doi:10.1080/03610926.2011.599010
  • Automotive Industries Action Group. (1995). Production part approval process (2nd ed.). Michigan: AIAG.
  • Carlin, B.P., & Louis, T.A. (2000). Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis (2nd ed.). London: CRC Press.
  • Carlsson, O. (1998). Properties of the Cpm index for seemingly unstable production processes. In Bovis, A. (Ed.), Quality improvement through statistical methods (pp. 163–172). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
  • Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W., & Spiring, F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology, 20, 162–175.
  • De Groot, M.H. (1970). Optimal statistical decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dong, J., Subrahmanyam, K.V.R., Wong, Y.S., Hong, G.S., & Mohanty, A.R. (2006). Bayesian-inference-based neural networks for tool wear estimation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30, 797–807. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0124-8
  • Gelman, A. (2006). Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 515–533.
  • Grant, E., & Leavenworth, R. (1974). Statistical quality control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hsiang, T.C., & Taguchi, G. (1985). A tutorial on quality control and assurance - the Taguchi methods. Las Vegas: ASA Annual Meeting.
  • Jackman, S. (2009). Bayesian analysis for the social sciences. New York: Wiley.
  • Jagadeesh, R., & Babu, A.S. (1994). Process capability assessment with tool wear: An investigative study. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 11, 51–62. doi:10.1108/02656719410051698
  • Kane, V.E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 41–52.
  • Kotz, S., & Johnson, N.L. (1993). Process capability indices. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Kotz, S., & Lovelace, C.R. (1998). Process capability indices in theory and practice. London: Arnold.
  • Long, J.M., & De Coste, M.J. (1988). Capability studies involving tool wear. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions, 42, 590–596.
  • Majeske, K.D., & Hammett, P.C. (2002). Identifying sources of variation in sheet metal stamping. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 15, 5–18.
  • Min, Z. (2007). Tool replacement method study based on process capability and cost. Second IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 516–521.
  • Montgomery, D.C. (2013). Introduction to statistical quality control (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Morris, C. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference: Theory and application (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 47–65. doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10477920
  • Pearn, W.L., & Kotz, S. (2006). Encyclopedia and handbook of process capability indices. New Jersey: World Scientific.
  • Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing (DSC 2003), March 20–22, Vienna: Austria.
  • Polansky, A.M., & Kirmani, S.N.U.A. (2002). Quantifying the capability of industrial processes. Handbook of Statistics: Statistics in Industry, 22, 625–656.
  • Spiring, F.A. (1991). Assessing process capability in the presence of systematic assignable cause. Journal of Quality Technology, 23, 125–134.
  • Stein, C. (1955). Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 197–206.
  • Xie, M., Tsui, K.L., Goh, T.N., & Cai, D.Q. (2002). Process capability indices for a regularly adjusted process. International Journal of Production Research, 40, 2367–2377.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.