The New and Relocating Recreation and Parks Faculty Market: The Factors Affecting Job Decisions

References

• Allen, W. R., Drevs, R. A., & Ruhe, J. A. (1999). Reasons why college-educated women change employment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(1), 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. M. & Gladwell, N. J. (2004). A major challenge for recreation, parks, and tourism educators: An importance performance analysis of factors that influence the recruitment and retention of faculty. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 19, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., LePine, M. A., & Moynihan, L. A. (2003). Individual job-choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, J. L., & Fox, J. E. (2002). Retaining quality teachers. High School Journal, 86(1), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L. (1991). A profile of students in recreation, park, and tourism doctoral programs at eight major U.S. universities. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 9(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Garger, E. M. (1999). Holding on to high performers: A strategic approach to retention. Compensation and Benefits Management, 15(4), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. H., & Brooke, V. (2001). Recruiting and retaining the best from America's largest untapped talent pool. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16(2), 83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K., & DesJarlais, C. D. (1994). Barriers to tenure for women and minorities. The Review of Higher Education, 17(4), 335–353.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. B. (1991). Fact book of theological education for academic year 1990–91. Vandalia, OH: Association of theological Schools in the United States and Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, B. (1999). HR squeezed by tight labor market. HR Magazine, 44(6), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 75–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. G., Brenda, A. M., & Pamela, E. F. (1995). Research doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: a tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattox, J. R., & Jinkerson, D. L. (2005). Using survival analysis to demonstrate the effects of training on employee retention. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengak, K. K., Dottavio, F. D., & O'Leary, J. T. (1986). Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate a visitor center. Journal of Interpretation, 11(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nienhuis, R. W. (1994, November). Satisfied faculty and involved chairpersons: Keys to faculty retention. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22, 617–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, R. W., & Heyne, L. A. (1999). Departments in search of recreation professors. SPRE Newsletter, 24(3), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. (2000). Employee retention - What can the benefits professional do? Employee Benefits Journal, 25(4), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L., & Barber, A. E. (2001). Applicant attraction strategies: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 286–310.
   Google Scholar
• Sturges, J., & Guest, D. (2001). “Don't leave me this way!” A qualitative study of influences on the organizational commitment and turnover intentions of graduates early in their career. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 29(4), 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. M., & Schmidt, D. W. (1983). A process oriented investigation of recruitment source effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 36(2), 343–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurgood, D. H., & Clarke, J. E. (1995). Summary report 1993: Doctorate recipients from United States universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turban, D. B. (2001). Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campuses: An examination of the applicant population. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. C. (1966). Employee referrals: A prime tool for recruiting workers. Personnel, 43, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (1998). National postsecondary student aid study 1996: Graduate and first-professional students. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. D., & Landau, J. (1996). The effectiveness of different recruitment sources: A mediating variable analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(15), 1337–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitebook, M., & Sakai, L. (2003). Turnover begets turnover: An examination of job and occupational instability among child care staff. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 273–293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavas, U., & Shemwell, D. J. (2001). Modified importance-performance analysis: An Application to hospitals, 14(3), 104–110.
   Google Scholar