12
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examining Social Capital in the Conference Setting: A Case Study of College Student Participants

, &
Pages 38-49 | Published online: 13 Dec 2017

References

  • Bartlett, J. E. II, Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size for survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43–50.
  • Bjorklund, S. A., Parente, J. M., & Sathianathan, D. (2002). Effects of faculty interaction and feedback on gains in student skills. In 32nd Annual Conference Proceeding of ASSEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. B9–B14). Boston: ASSEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
  • Braxton, J. L., Milem, J. F, & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision in Tinto's theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 569–590.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (2000, Volume 22). The network structure of social capital. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/ronald.burt/research/NSSC.pdf
  • Colbeck, C. L., Campbell, S. E., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 60–83.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement), S95–S120.
  • Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464–494.
  • Dahl, R. F. (1999). A commentary on the perils of intellectual isolation. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 199–201.
  • Davison, C. M. (2005). Benchmarks for social justice: Assessing the fairness of academic conference participation. Promotion and Education, 12, 71–76.
  • Dolan, J., Kropf, M. E., O'Connor, K., & Erza, M. (1997, December). The future of our discipline: The status of doctoral students in political science. Political Science & Politics, 751–756.
  • Felder, R. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 286–290.
  • Francioni, J. M. (2002). A conference's impact on undergraduate female students. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 66–69.
  • Goodale, T. (1991). Bridging the gap between research, practice, and policy. Journal of Applied Recreation Research 16, 69–84.
  • Jordan, D. J., & Roland, M. (1999). An examination of differences between academics and practitioners in frequency of reading research and attitudes towards research. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 166–170.
  • Madrigal, R. (1999). Comment on the impact of leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 195–198.
  • McGuire, F. (2000). What do we know? Not much: The state of leisure and aging research. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 97–100.
  • Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2004). Knowledge diffusion dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 327–351.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1998). Studying college students in the 21st century: Meeting new challenges. The Review of Higher Education, 21.2, 151–165.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2). Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html
  • Vaugeois, N. L, Rollins, R., Hammer, K., Randall, C., Clark, B., & Balmer, K. (2005). Realizing improved knowledge transfer in the leisure industry: A new agenda and strategies to link researchers and professionals. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from www.lin.ca/resource/html/ttradelphipaper.pdf
  • Witt, P. A. (2000). If leisure research is to matter II. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 186–189.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.