Embarking on a Rhetorical Exploration: Accommodating Science (or Not) in Leisure Research

References

• Barends, E., Villanueva, J., Rousseau, D. M., Briner, R. B., Jepsen, D. M., Houghton, E., & ten Have, S. (2017). Managerial attitudes and perceived barriers regarding evidence-based practice: An international survey. Plos One, 12(10), e0184594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1998). Emerging perspectives on the many dimensions of scientific discourse. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourse in science (pp. 15–28). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, R. (1985). The coming separation of leisure studies from parks and recreation education. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. (1999). Enhancing accessibility and visibility of leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 192–194. doi:10.1080/00222216.1999.11949861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1989). Arguing in different forums: The Bering crossover controversy. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14(1), 26–42. doi:10.1177/016224398901400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15(3), 275–296. (Reprinted from Written Communication, 3(1986), 275–296).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (2004). Preserving the figure: Consistency in the presentation of scientific arguments. Written Communication, 21(1), 6–31. doi:10.1177/0741088303261034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (2005). Rhetoric of science: Enriching the discipline. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 277–286. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_5
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1982). A rhetoric of argument. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1988). The stases in scientific and literary argument. Written Communication, 5(4), 427–443. doi:10.1177/0741088388005004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frechtling, D. C. (2004). Assessment of tourism/hospitality journals’ role in knowledge transfer: An exploratory study. Journal of Travel Research, 43(2), 100–107. doi:10.1177/0047287504268230
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, W. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. (2004). Why Hermagoras still matters: The fourth stasis and interdisciplinarity. Rhetoric Review, 23(2), 141–155. doi:10.1207/s15327981rr2302_3
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A., Harmon, J., & Reidy, M. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1997). Introduction. In R. Harris (Ed.), Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies (pp. xi–xlv). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingway, J. L., & Parr, M. (2000). Leisure research and leisure practice: Three perspectives on constructing the research-practice relation. Leisure Sciences, 22, 139–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A. (1990). Introduction: Rhetoric in research, networks of knowledge. In A. Hunter (Ed.), The rhetoric of social research: Understood and believed (pp. 1–22). London, UK: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. W., Parry, D. C., & Wagler, F.-A. (2018). Introduction to the special issue looking back, looking forward: 40 years of Leisure Sciences. Leisure Sciences, 40(1–2), 1–8. doi:10.1080/01490400.2017.1376235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, D., & Roland, M. (1999). An examination of differences between academics and practitioners in frequency of reading research and attitudes toward research. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 166–170. doi:10.1080/00222216.1999.11949856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journal of Leisure Research (JLR) Instructions for Authors. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.nrpa.org/contentassets/88728f4e0bff4f5fa1c60a3d641a6434/jlr-instructions-for-authors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal, R. (1999). Comment on the impact of leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 195–197. doi:10.1080/00222216.1999.11949862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Recreation and Park Administration. (2017). Journal of Leisure Research (JLR)|National Recreation and Park Administration. Retrieved from http://www.nrpa.org/jlr
   Google Scholar
• Parr, M. (1996). The relationship between leisure theory and recreation practice. Leisure Sciences, 18(4), 315–332. doi:10.1080/01490409609513291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedlar, A. (1999). Speaking eachothers’ language: Should insularity concern us? Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 181–184. doi:10.1080/00222216.1999.11949858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, A., & Katz, S. (2004). Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, K. (1989). Moving beyond the what to the why: Differences in professional and popular science writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19(2), 161–179. doi:10.2190/2V4E-G0XU-2K4P-UQH0
   Google Scholar
• Sagamore-Venture Publishing. (2017). Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. Retrieved from: https://js.sagamorepub.com/jpra
   Google Scholar
• Salk, J. (1979). Introduction. In B. Latour & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (pp. 11–14). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Schickore, J. (2008). Doing science, writing science. Philosophy of Science, 75(3), 323–343. doi:10.1086/592951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. (1999). Myths of leisure research: An uneasy alliance. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 185–187. doi:10.1080/00222216.1999.11949859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokowski, P. (1999). Trophy hunting in the shadow of the castle keep. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 189–191. doi:10.1080/00222216.1999.11949860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaugeois, N. L., Rollins, R., Hammer, K., Randall, C., Clark, B., & Balmer, K. (2005, January). Realizing improved knowledge transfer in the leisure industry: A new agenda and strategies to link researchers and professionals. Paper presented at the TTRA Canada Conference Proceedings. Kelowna, BC. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228467818_Realizing_improved_knowledge_transfer_in_the_leisure_industry_A_new_agenda_and_strategies_to_link_researchers_and_professionals
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. (2000). If leisure research is to matter II. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 186–189. doi:10.1080/00222216.2000.11949912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, H., & Smith, S. L. J. (2010). Professional communication in an applied tourism research community. Tourism Management, 31(3), 402–411. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L., Florence, M., Pearson, T., & Weaver, A. (2006). Written discourses in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 109–141. doi:10.1080/09500690500336601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar