Visualizing a Non-Visual Medium through Social Media: The Semiotics of Radio Station Posts on Instagram

References

• Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Babbie, E. R. (2004). The basics of communication research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. A. (1999). Signs in contemporary culture. Salem, WI: Sheffield Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bignell, J. (2002). Media semiotics: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bubaris, N. (2014). Signs at the interface: An explanation of semiotics and interaction design. In E. Zantides (Ed.), Semiotics and visual communication: Concepts and practices (pp. 100–109). Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, D. (2014). The interpersonal voice: Applying appraisal to the rap and sung voice. Social Semiotics, 24(1), 40–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.827357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan-Olmsted, S. (2011). Media branding in a changing world: Challenges and opportunities 2.0. The International Journal on Media Management, 13, 3–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2011.568305
   Google Scholar
• Constine, J. (2017, April 26). Instagram’s growth speeds up as it hits 700 million users. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/26/instagram-700-million-users/
   Google Scholar
• Covert, L. L. (1992). “We may hear too much”: American sensibility and the response to radio, 1919-1924. In J. Folkerts (Ed.), Media voices: An historical perspective (pp. 300–315). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, P. H. (1985, April 22). A theme for radio ad sales. The New York Times. Retrieved from NYTimes.com.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Page, D. (2015, August 19). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, S. T., Ferguson, D. A., & Klein, R. A. (2006). Media promotion & marketing for broadcasting, cable & the Internet (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Focal Press. [reissued 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1976). The theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• eMarketer. (2016, February 22). Instagram continues double-digit growth: More than a third of mobile phone users will be on Instagram in 2016. Retrieved from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Instagram-Continues-Double-Digit-Growth/1013612
   Google Scholar
• Ersoz, M. (1998). Gimme that old-time religion in a postmodern age: Semiotics of Christian radio. In L. Kintz & J. Lesage (Eds.), Media, culture, and the religious right (pp. 211–225). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, D., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). The visual representation of metaphor: A social semiotic approach. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 330–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.07fen
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. A. (2012). The trivial pursuits of mass audiences using social media: A content analysis of Facebook wall posts by fans of top-trending television programs. In H. S. Noor Al-Deen & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.), Social media usage and impact (pp. 39–53). New York, NY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. A., & Greer, C. F. (2011). Local radio and microblogging: How radio stations in the U.S. are using Twitter. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 18(1), 33–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2011.558867
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, A. A., Hamilton, A. L., & Patvardhan, S. D. (2014). Image is everything: Reflection on the dominance of image in modern organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 129–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graakjaer, N. J. (2012). Dance in the store: On the use and production of music in Abercrombie & Fitch. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(4), 393–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.713208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, C., & Phipps, T. (2003). Noncommercial religious radio stations and the Web. Journal of Radio Studies, 10(1), 17–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1001_4
   Google Scholar
• Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2016, November). Local TV presentation of self on Instagram: Applying Goffman to organizational use of social media. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Damas, S., & Hermida, A. (2014). Tweeting but not talking: The missing element in talk radio’s institutional use of Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 481–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilmes, M. (1990). Hollywood and broadcasting: From radio to cable. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, C. A., & Coffey, A. J. (2006). Qualitative research in media management and economics. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 573–600). Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jappy, T. (2013). Introduction to Peircian visual semiotics. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., Lin, J., Gilbreath, B., & Lee, Y. (2017). Motivations, consumption emotions, and temporal orientations in social media use: A strategic approach to engaging stakeholders across platforms. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11, 115–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2017.1285769
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M. Q., & Patnoe-Woodley, P. R. (2016). Exploring the influence of parasocial relationships and experiences on radio listeners’ consumer behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 40–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1117440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. Y. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A., & Jeffres, L. W. (2001). Comparing distinctions and similarities across websites of newspapers, radio stations, and television stations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 555–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Manikonda, L., Meduri, V. V., & Kambhampati, S. (2016, March). Tweeting the mind and Instagramming the heart: Exploring differentiated content sharing on social media. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, North America. Available at: www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/view/13166
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, E. (2012, April 10). How Instagram grew from Foursquare knock-off to $1 billion photo empire. Retrieved from http://www.inc.com
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, S. (2004). Visual semiotics theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 227–242). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, S. E. (2002). The symbiotics of semiotics and visual communication. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22(1), 19–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2002.11674579
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, L. R. (2012). Marketing semiotics: Signs, strategies, and brand value. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patnode, R. (2011). The missing signifier: Re-presenting radio broadcasting in New Yorker cartoons, 1925-45. American Periodicals, 21(2), 164–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/amp.2011.0011
   Google Scholar
• Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2017). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 412–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, W., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2004). Radio content on the World Wide Web: Comparing streaming radio stations in the United States. Journal of Radio Studies, 11(1), 6–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1101_3
   Google Scholar
• Savitz, E. (2012). Facebook paying $300 million cash, 23M shares for Instagram. Retrieved from Forbes.com
   Google Scholar
• Southern, L. (2016, July 26). How Bauer radio station KISS FM is using Snapchat. Retrieved from Digiday.com.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., & Aiello, G. (2007). National pride, global capital: A social semiotic analysis of transnational visual branding in the airline industry. Visual Communication, 6(3), 305–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207081002
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality and multimodal research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of research methods (pp. 549–569). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, N. (2012). Theatre of the mind: Imagination, aesthetics, and American radio drama. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, C. (2009). Media selling: Television, print, internet, radio (4th ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707349
   Google Scholar