Human development in Morocco: out-of-sample prediction using spatial econometrics and RandomForest

References

• Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—lisa. geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., & Rey, S. J. (2014). Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press LLC
   Google Scholar
• Bagolin, I. (2004). Human development index (HDI)-A poor representation to human development approach. University of Rio Grande do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Meir, Y. (2015). Human development in the arab spring: Morocco’s efforts to shape its global future. Mediterranean Quarterly, 26(3), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-3145768
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, S. I. (2012). ‘Inclusive’Neoliberalism, local governance reforms and the redeployment of state power: The case of the National Initiative for human development (INDH) in Morocco. Mediterranean Politics, 17(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2012.725304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, E., & Rey, S. J. (2006). The spatial dimension of economic growth and convergence. Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, G. (2014). The human sustainable development index: New calculations and a first critical analysis. Ecological Indicators, 37(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.10.020
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, M. B. (2005). Is the human development index redundant? Eastern Economic Journal, 31(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., & Squire, L. (2006). Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(5), 761–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380600741904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. A. (2005). Sen’s capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(8), 1339–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500186853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: Models & applications (Vol. 44). Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M. (1991). Human development: Concepts and measurement. European Economic Review, 35(2–3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90136-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetahagić, M. (2011). Human development indicators and spatial development and planning: Opportunities and challenges. HDCA Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. A. (1997). The inequality-adjusted human development index: A constructive proposal. World Development, 25(8), 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00034-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, A. C. (1991). The human development index. Handle with Care”. Population and Development Review, 17 (2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F., & Choi, H. J. (2011). The HDI 2010: New controversies, old critiques. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 249–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9178-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacevic, M. (2010). Review of HDI critiques and potential improvements. Human development research paper, 33. United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., & Fang, C. (2014). Analyzing the multi-mechanism of regional inequality in China. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0580-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Maccari, N. (2014). Sustainable human development: Human development index and the environment. International Journal of Sustainable Human Development, 2(1), 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Martín, I. (2006). Morocco wakes up to human development. Mediterranean Politics, 11(3), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629390600914138
   Google Scholar
• McBride, L., & Nichols, A. (2015). Improved poverty targeting through machine learning: An application to the USAID poverty assessment tools. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: http://www.econthatmatters.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/improvedtargeting_21jan2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGillivray, M. (1991). The human development index: Yet another redundant composite development indicator? World Development, 19(10), 1461–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90088-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorbakhsh, F. (1998). The human development index: Some technical issues and alternative indices. Journal of International Development, 10(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199807/08)10:5<589
   Google Scholar
• Palazzi, P., & Lauri, A. (1998). The human development index: Suggested corrections. PSL Quarterly Review, 51(205), 193–221.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. R., & Purser, C. W. (2008). Measuring relative sub-national human development: An application of the United Nation’s Human development index using geographic information systems. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 33(4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.3233/JEM-2008-0307
   Google Scholar
• Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Samman, E. (2006). Human development: Beyond the human development index. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 323–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600815917
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M. (2012). Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resende, G. M. (2011). Multiple dimensions of regional economic growth: The Brazilian case, 1991− 2000. Papers in Regional Science, 90(3), 629–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, S. J., & Janikas, M. V. (2005). Regional convergence, inequality, and space. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, R., & Nurwita, E. (2010). The spatial dimension of human development index in Indonesia ( pp. 6). Center for Economics and Development Studies, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University Jalan Cimandiri.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, A. D., & Najam, A. (1998). The human development index: A critical review. Ecological Economics, 25(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrott, L., Gächter, M., & Theurl, E. (2015). Regional development in advanced countries: A within-country application of the human development index for Austria. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0001
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capability. Commodities and capability. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. K. Fukuda-Parr (Ed.), Readings in human development (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sohnesen, T. P., & Stender, N. (2016). Is random forest a superior methodology for predicting poverty? An empirical assessment. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Thoplan, R. (2014). Random forests for poverty classification. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), North America, 17(2), 252–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ul Haq, M. (1995). Reflections on human development. oxford university Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, T. R. (2012). Sen’s capability approach. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP). Retrieved June 1, 2017, from www.iep.utm.edu/sen-cap/
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, H., Chong, H., & Auffhammer, M. (2011). Classification, detection and consequences of data error: Evidence from the human development index. The Economic Journal, 121(553), 843–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrano, E. (2014). An axiomatization of the human development index. Social Choice and Welfare, 42(4), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0756-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar