Voices from the workplace: practitioners’ perspectives on the role of empathy and care within engineering

References

• Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2012–2013 Accreditation Cycle. <http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/eac-criteria-2012-2013.pdf> Accreditation, ABET, 2012. Accessed September 21, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET). Rationale for Revising Criteria 3 and 5. <http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-alerts/rationale-for-revising-criteria-3/> Accreditation, ABET, n.d. Accessed September 21, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon W. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE Steering Committee. The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Asgill, Austin. “Introducing Safety and Health Issues into an Engineering Technology Curriculum.” ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. Daniel. “These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomenon.” In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, edited by Jean Decety and William Ickes, 3–15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. Daniel, Nadia Ahmad, and David A. Lishner. “Empathy and Altruism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2nd ed., edited by C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez, 417–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, Maura, Elliot P. Douglas, and Catherine T. Amelink. “Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 98, no. 1 (2009): 53–66. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Mark H. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, Neelke. “Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18, no. 1 (2012): 69–90. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9189-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo, Antonion Dias. “Toward an Epistemology of Engineering.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Philosophy of Engineering, The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fila, Nicholas D., and Justin L. Hess. “Exploring the Role of Empathy in a Service-learning Design Project.” In Analyzing Design Review Conversations, edited by Robin S. Adams and Junaid A. Siddiqui, 135–54. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fila, Nicholas D., Justin L. Hess, Avneet Hira, Cole H. Joslyn, DeLean Tolbert, and Morgan M. Hynes. “The People Part of Engineering: Engineering For, With, and as People.” Paper presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fila, Nicholas D., Justin L. Hess, Şenay Purzer, and Emily Dringenberg. “Engineering Students’ Utilization of Empathy During a Non-immersive Conceptual Design Task.” International Journal of Engineering Education 32, no. 3B (2016): 1336–48.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, 3–30. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Pyschological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Grasso, Domenico, and Melody Burkins. Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology. New York, NY: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin M., Seda Yilmaz, Shanna R. Daly, Colleen M. Seifert, and Richard Gonzalez. “Idea Generation Through Empathy: Reimagining the ‘Cognitive Walkthrough’.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren, Kevin A. “Computing Inter-rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial.” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 8, no. 1 (2012): 23–34. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hess, Justin L. “A Multi-phase Exploration of Conceptualizations, Perceived Importance, and the Development of Empathy Within Engineering.” Unpublished PhD diss., Purdue University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Justin L., and Nicholas D. Fila. “The Manifestation of Empathy Within Design: Findings from a Service-learning Course.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 12, no. 1–2 (2016): 93–111. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2015.1135243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, Justin L., Jessica Erin Sprowl, Rui Pan, Melissa Dyehouse, Carrie A. Wachter Morris, and Johannes Strobel. “Empathy and Caring as Conceptualized Inside and Outside of Engineering: Extensive Literature Review and Faculty Focus Group Analyses.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Justin L., and Johannes Strobel. “Sustainability and the Engineering Worldview.” Paper presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Justin L., Johannes Strobel, Rui Pan, and Carrie A. Wachter Morris. “Practicing Engineers’ Perceptions of Empathy and Care: Derived Exploratory Factor Structure from a 37-Item Survey.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, Timothy R. “A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires.” Organizational Research Methods 1, no. 1 (1998): 104–21. doi: 10.1177/109442819800100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Martin L. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, Morgan, and Jessica Swenson. “The Humanistic Side of Engineering: Considering Social Science and Humanities Dimensions of Engineering in Education and Research.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education 3, no. 2 (2013): 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Daniel G., Nicole Genco, Matthew N. Saunders, Paul Williams, Carolyn Conner Seepersad, and Katja Hölttä-Otto. “An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Empathic Experience Design for Innovative Concept Generation.” Journal of Mechanical Design 136, no. 5 (2014): 1–12. doi: 10.1115/1.4026951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunyk, Diane, and Joanne K. Olson. “Clarification of Conceptualizations of Empathy.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 35, no. 3 (2001): 317–25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok-leung Ho, Denny, Jin Ma, and Yanki Lee. “Empathy @ Design Research: A Phenomenological Study on Young People Experiencing Participatory Design for Social Inclusion.” CoDesign 7, no. 2 (2011): 95–106. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.609893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, Dorothy, and Jeffrey F. Rayport. “Spark Innovation Through Empathic Design.” Harvard Business Review 75, no. 6 (1997): 102–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydens, Jon A., and Juan C. Lucena. “The Problem of Knowledge in Incorporating Humanitarian Ethics in Engineering Education: Barriers and Opportunities.” Presented at the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Leydens, Jon A., and Juan C. Lucena. “Listening as a Missing Dimension in Engineering Education: Implications for Sustainable Community Development Efforts.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 52, no. 4 (2009): 359–76. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2009.2032383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydens, Jon A., and Juan C. Lucena. “Social Justice: A Missing, Unelaborated Dimension in Humanitarian Engineering and Learning Through Service.” International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship 9, no. 2 (2014): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, Max. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeroff, Milton. On Caring. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, G., and Y. Julliard. “On Subjectivity in Focal Engineering.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on Technology and Society, Stamford, CT, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mower, Deborah S. “Reflections on … A “Group” Culture.” Teaching Ethics 15, no. 2 (2015): 227–44. doi: 10.5840/tej20159325
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• National Society of Professional Engineers. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. <https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics> NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers, National Society of Professional Engineers, 2013. Accessed September 21, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, Julinna C. The Moral Dimensions of Empathy: Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pantazidou, Marina, and Indira Nair. “Ethic of Care: Guiding Principles for Engineering Teaching and Practice.” Journal of Engineering Education 88, no. 2 (1999): 205–12. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00436.x
   Google Scholar
• Postma, Carolien, Elly Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, Elke Daemen, and Jia Du. “Challenges of Doing Empathic Design: Experiences from Industry.” International Journal of Design 6, no. 1 (2012): 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasoal, Chato, Henrik Danielsson, and Tomas Jungert. “Empathy among Students in Engineering Programmes.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37, no. 5 (2012): 427–35. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.708720
   Google Scholar
• Riley, Donna. Engineering and Social Justice. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, Donna M., and Yanna Lambrinidou. “Canons Against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics Imaginary.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, Sabine. “Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18, no. 1 (2012): 103–15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Liz. “Exploring Co-creation on a Large Scale.” Presented at Designing For, With, and From User Experiences, TU Delft, Delft, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Jen, Juan C. Lucena, and Jon A. Leydens. “Engineering to Help: The Value of Critique in Engineering Service.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 28, no. 4 (2009): 42–8. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2009.935008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stich, Stephen, John M. Doris, and Erica Roedder. “Altruism.” In Moral Psychology Handbook, edited by John M. Doris, 147–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Strobel, Johannes, Justin L. Hess, Rui (Celia) Pan, and Carrie A. Wachter Morris. “Empathy and Care Within Engineering: Qualitative Perspectives from Engineering Faculty and Practicing Engineers.” Engineering Studies 5, no. 2 (2013): 137–59. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2013.814136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel, Johannes, Carrie Wacther Morris, Lisa Klingler, Rui Pan, Melissa Dyehouse, and Nicole Weber. “Engineering as a Caring and Empathetic Discipline: Conceptualizations and Comparisons.” Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Teslow, James, Yan Sun, and Johannes Strobel. “Assessing Pre-college Engineering Education Curricula: A Holistic and Practice-oriented Perspective.” In The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, edited by D. Wyse, L. Hayward, and J. Pandya, 487–505. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vallero, Daniel A. “Macroethics and Engineering Leadership.” Leadership and Management in Engineering 8, no. 4 (2008): 287–96. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2008)8:4(287)
   Google Scholar
• Vallero, D., and P. Vesilind. “Preventing Disputes with Empathy.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 132, no. 3 (2006): 272–78. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(272)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, Geoff. “The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research.” Information Systems Research 6, no. 4 (1995): 376–94. doi: 10.1287/isre.6.4.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, Joachim, Shari E. Miller, and Nadia N. Kellam. “Exploring the Role of Empathy in Engineering Communication Through a Trans-disciplinary Dialogue.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, Joachim, Shari Miller, and Nicola W. Sochacka. “A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being.” Journal of Engineering Education (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Walther, Joachim, Nicola W. Sochacka, and Nadia N. Kellam. “Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study.” Journal of Engineering Education 102, no. 4 (2013): 626–59. doi: 10.1002/jee.20029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Ron. “The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism: A Personal View.” MIS Quarterly 28, no. 1 (2004): iii–xii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wynsberghe, Aimee. “Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-sensitive Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19, no. 2 (2013): 407–33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoltowski, Carla B., William C. Oakes, and Monica E. Cardella. “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-centered Design.” Journal of Engineering Education 101, no. 1 (2012): 28–59. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar