Connecting Engineering Processes and Responsible Innovation: A Response to Macro-Ethical Challenges

References

• ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, October 2013.” Accessed June 5, 2018. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/E001-14-15-EAC-Criteria.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Allenby, Bradon. “Macroethical Systems and Sustainability Science.” Sustainability Science 1, no. 1 (2006): 7–13. doi: 10.1007/s11625-006-0003-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arizona State University––School for the Future of Innovation [ASU-SFIS]. “Responsible Innovation in Science, Engineering and Society (Graduate Certificate).”  Accessed June 2, 2018. doi: https://sfis.asu.edu/degree/responsible-innovation-science-engineering-society-graduate-certificate.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. Code of Ethics, July 29, 2017. Accessed June 2, 2018. doi: https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/About_ASCE/Ethics/Content_Pieces/Code-of-Ethics-July-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BCS. Code of Conduct.  Accessed June 5, 2018. doi: https://www.bcs.org/category/6030.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Michael J., Rider W. Foley, and Ira Bennett. “An Operationalized Post-Normal Science Framework for Assisting in the Development of Complex Science Policy Solutions: The Case of Nanotechnology Governance.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 16 (2014): 2492. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2492-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, Jacquelin, and Jason Chilvers. “Upping the Ante: A Conceptual Framework for Designing and Evaluating Participatory Technology Assessments.” Science and Public Policy 33, no. 4 (2006): 713–728. doi: 10.3152/147154306781778551.
   Google Scholar
• Cech, Erin. “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?” Science, Technology, and Human Values 39, no. 1 (2014): 42–72. doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason. “Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice.” Science Technology and Human Values 33, no. 2 (2008): 155–185. doi: 10.1177/0162243907307594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Date, Geetanjali, and Sanjay Chandrasekharan. “Beyond Efficiency: Engineering for Sustainability Requires Solving for Pattern.” Engineering Studies 10, no. 1 (2018): 12–37. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1410160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saille, Stevienna. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2, no. 2 (2015): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, Gary, and Juan Lucena. “National Identities in Multinational Worlds: Engineers and ‘Engineering Cultures’.” International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning (2005). doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2005.007714.
   Google Scholar
• Dym, Clive L., Alice M. Agogino, Ozgur Eris, Daniel D. Frey, and Larry J. Leifer. “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education 94, no. 1 (2005): 103–120. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineering Council. UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence. 3rd ed. London: Engineering Council, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering Council. The Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes. UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence. 3rd ed. London: Engineering Council, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Enhancing Responsible Research and Innovation through Curricula in Higher Education (EnRRICH). “Periodic Reporting for period 1 - EnRRICH (Enhancing Responsible Research and Innovation Through Curricula in Higher Education (EnRRICH)”, 2016. European Commision. Accessed May 2, 2017.  doi: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/197445/reporting/en.
   Google Scholar
• EPSRC. Framework for Responsible Innovation, 2018. Accessed June 2, 2018. doi: https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/framework.
   Google Scholar
• EUR-ACE. Framework Standards and Guidelines. European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education, European Union, 2015. Accessed June 5, 2018. doi: http://www.enaee.eu/wp-assets-enaee/uploads/2017/11/EAFSG-Doc-Full-status-8-Sept-15-on-web-fm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Sean, M. and Foley, and W. Rider. “Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABET Accreditation: A Pilot Study of Fourth Year Engineering Students Using Longitudinal Concept Maps.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the American society for engineering education, Columbus OH, June 25–28, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, and Carl Mitcham. ““Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26, no. 6 (2006): 485–496. doi: 10.1177/0270467606295402.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Rider W., Michael J. Bernstein, and Arnim Wiek. “Towards an Alignment of Activities, Aspirations and Stakeholders for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3, no. 3 (2016): 209–232. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1257380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Beverley, Rider W. Foley, and Paul Martin. Responsible Research and Innovation in the Classroom: A Workshop Report. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 2016. doi: 10.18130/V31X8Z.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Beverley, Carmen McLeod, Sarah Hartley, and Warren Pearce. “‘Why are You Telling Me This?’ ‘What do I do With it?’ The TERRAIN Teaching Tool as an Account of Interdisciplinary Pedagogy.” Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Robert B. “Sustainability Assessment: Basic Components of a Practical Approach.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24 (2006): 170–182. doi: 10.3152/147154606781765147.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 42, no. 2 (2014): 218–242. doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Sarah, Froydis Gillund, Lillian van Hove, and Fern Wickson. “Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology.” PLOS Biology 14, no. 5 (2016): e1002453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, Sarah, Warren Pearce, Carmen McLeod, Beverley Gibbs, et al. The TERRAIN Tool for Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation. Report. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Sarah, Warren Pearce, and Alasdair Taylor. “Against the Tide of Depoliticisation: The Politics of Research Governance.” Policy & Politics 45, no. 3 (2017): 361–377. doi: 10.1332/030557316X14681503832036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herkert, Joseph R. “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2001): 403–414. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0062-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Thomas P. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by Wiebe Bjiker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 51–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlburt, George F., Keith W. Miller, and Jeffrey M. Voas. “An Ethical Analysis of Automation, Risk, and the Financial Crises of 2008.” IT Professional 11, no. 1 (2009): 14–19. doi: 10.1109/MITP.2009.2.
   Google Scholar
• IMechE. Code of Conduct Regulations, March 15, 2017.  Accessed June 5, 2018. doi: http://www.imeche.org/docs/default-source/governance-documents/code-of-conduct-final-agreed-by-tb-150317v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• INCOSE. Code of Ethics, 2018. Accessed June 2, 2018. doi: https://www.incose.org/about-incose/Leadership-Organization/code-of-ethics.
   Google Scholar
• ISEE [International Symposium on Engineering Education]. Call for Papers, 2016. ISEE, 2016. Accessed September 3, 2016. doi: http://isee2016.group.shef.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Shiela. “The Floating Ampersand: STS Past and STS to Come.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2 (2016): 227–237. doi: 10.17351/ests2016.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, Rene, Saeed Parto, and Robert B. Gibson. “Governance for Sustainable Development : Moving From Theory to Practice.” International Journal of Sustainable Development 8, no. 1/2 (2005): 12–30. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
   Google Scholar
• Khandekhar, Aalok. “Engineering the Global Indian: Skills, Cosmopolitanism, and Families in Circuits of High-Tech Migrations Between India and the United States.” Ph.D. diss., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, Anette, Erik de Graff, and Xiangyun Du. “PBD Diversity in Research Questions and Methodologies” Inof PBL – PBL Learning Principles and Models.” In Research on PBL Practice in Engineering Education, edited by Xiangyun Du, Erik de Graff, and Anette Kolmos, 1–9. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, Tsai C., Samuel H. Huang, and Hong-Chao Zhang. “Design for Manufacture and Design for ‘X’: Concepts, Applications, and Perspectives.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 41, no. 3 (2001): 241–260. doi: 10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00045-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, Derk. “Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development.” PhD Dissertation, University of Eramus-Rotterdam, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lucky, Robert W. “Reflections: Unsystematic Engineering.” IEEE-Spectrum 43, no. 9 (2006): 84. doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.2006.1688266.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, Geoff, Oscar Townsley, and Adam Price. The Challenge-Driven University: How Real Life Problems can Fuel Learning. London: NESTA, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Science. Infusing Ethics Into the Development of Engineers: Exemplary Education Activities and Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. “Responsible Development of Nanotechnology.” In A Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Newberry, Byron. “Katrina: Macro-Ethical Issues for Engineers.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2010): 535–571. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9167-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ocone, Raffaella. “Engineering Ethics and Accreditation.” Education for Chemical Engineers 8, no. 3 (2013): e113–e118. doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2013.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor . “Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 20, no. 4 (2010): 550–557. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Jack Stilgoe, Phil Macnaghten, Michael E. Gorman, Erik Fisher, and David H. Guston. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. 1st ed., edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 27–50. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, Khara M., Karen S. Rommelfanger, Henry T. Greely, and Walter J. Koroshetz. “Neuroethics and the NIH BRAIN Initiative.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5, no. 1 (2017): 122–130. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1319035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Terry S., and Bruce E. Seely. “Striving for Balance: A Hundred Years of the American Society for Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 82, no. 3 (1993): 136–151. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00092.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Harro van Lente. “Bridging the Gap between Innovation and ELSA: The TA Program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed.” Nanoethics 7, no. 1 (2013): 7–16. doi: 10.1007/s11569-013-0171-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, Peter T. “The Reflexive Engineer: Perceptions of Integrated Development.” Journal of International Development 19, no. 1 (2007): 99–110. doi: 10.1002/jid.1351.
   Google Scholar
• RRI Tools. Higher Education Institutions and Responsible Research and Innovation, November 1, 2015. Accessed May 28, 2018. doi: https://www.rri-tools.eu/-/heirri_project#.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, Johan, and Arie Rip. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54, no. 2-3 (1997): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. “Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 32, no. 2 (2007): 196–220. doi: 10.1177/0162243906296918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruit, Shannon. “Responsible Innovation Through Ethics Education: Educating to Change Research Practice.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1, no. 2 (2014): 246–247. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.922344
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernard C., Michael Obach, Emad Yaghmaei, Veikko Ikonen, Kate Chatfield, and Alexander Brem. “The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice.” Sustainability 9, no. 6 (2017). doi: 10.3390/su9061036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42, no. 9 (2013): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, Gerry. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50, no. March (1998): 17–28. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00106.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, Mary E. “Using Student Engagement to Relocate Ethics to the Core of the Engineering Curriculum.” Science and Engineering Ethics (2013). doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9444-5.
   Google Scholar
• Technical University––Delft [TU-Delft]. Responsible Innovation: Ethics, Safety and Technology, 2018. Accessed June 2, 2018. doi: https://online-learning.tudelft.nl/courses/responsible-innovation/.
   Google Scholar
• UCL-STEaPP, [University College London-Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy]. How to Change the World, 2018. Accessed May 28, 2018. doi: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/steapp/how-to-change-the-world.
   Google Scholar
• Uff, John. “The Engineer’s Public Duty – the Role of the Institutions.” Ingenia 15, no. February/March (2003): 49-55.
   Google Scholar
• University of Twente. “Twente Educational Model.” 2018. Accessed June 2, 2018. doi: https://www.utwente.nl/en/tom/.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo, and Lamber Royakkers. Ethics, Technology and Engineering: An Introduction. New York: J.Wiley & Sons, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• van Hove, Lillian, and Fern Wickson. “Responsible Research Is Not Good Science: Divergences Inhibiting the Enactment of RRI in Nanosafety.” NanoEthics 11, no. 3 (2017): 213–228. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0306-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. 1st ed., edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wender, B. A., Rider W. Foley, Troy Hottle, Jathan Sadowski, Valentina Prado-Lopez, Daniel E. Eisenberg, Lisa Laurin, and Thomas P. Seager. “Anticipatory Life Cycle Assessment for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2014): 200–207. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.920121
   Google Scholar
• York, Emily. “Doing STS in STEM Spaces: Experiments in Critical Participation.” Engineering Studies 10, no. 1 (2018): 66–84. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2018.1447576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Rafael. “Justice and Innovation – Towards Principles for Creating a Fair Space for Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, no. 2 (2015): 184–200. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar