Models in Engineering Design as Decision-Making Aids

Bibliography

• Bailer-Jones, Daniela M. “When Scientific Models Represent.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, no. 1 (2003): 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, Euan, Kerr McMaster, Emma Thomson, Massimo Panarotto, Jakob Ramon Müller, Ola Isaksson, and Emil Johansson. “Designing and Integrating a Digital Thread System for Customized Additive Manufacturing in Multi-Partner Kayak Production.” Systems 8, no. 4 (2020): 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, David C., and Lucienne Blessing. “The Relationship Between Function and Affordance.” In ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 155-160. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, Louis L. Designing Engineers. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, Anjan. “Informational Versus Functional Theories of Scientific Representation.” Synthese 172, no. 197 (2010. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9502-3.
   Google Scholar
• Contessa, Gabriele. Models and Maps: An Essay on Epistemic Representation, unpublished manuscript, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Robert G. “Perspective: The Stage-Gate® Idea-to-Launch Process—Update, What's New, and Nexgen Systems.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 25, no. 3 (2008): 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, Claudia, P. John Clarkson, and Winfried Zanker. “Change and Customisation in Complex Engineering Domains.” Research in Engineering Design 15, no. 1 (2004): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, Claudia, Thomas Alink, Anne Ruckpaul, and Albert Albers. “Different Notions of Function: Results from an Experiment on the Analysis of an Existing Product.” Journal of Engineering Design 22, no. 11-12 (2011): 811–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, Claudia, Alan Blackwell, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl, and Luke Church. “Sketching Across Design Domains: Roles and Formalities.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 26, no. 3 (2012): 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, Claudia, and Rafaela Hillerbrand. “Models in Engineering Design: Generative and Epistemic Function of Product Models.” In Advancements in the Philosophy of Design, edited by P. E. Vermaas and S. Vial, 219–242. Cham: Springer, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, Claudia, and Martin Stacey. “What is a Process Model? Reflections on the Epistemology of Design Process Models.” In Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes, edited by P. Heisig, P. J. Clarkson, and S. Vajna, 3–14. London: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Frigg, Roman, and Stephan Hartmann. eds. “Models in Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012. https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/models-science/.
   Google Scholar
• Frigg, Roman, and James Nguyen. “Scientific Representation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2020 (Spring 2020 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/scientific-representation.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, John S., and Udo Kannengiesser. “The Situated Function–Behaviour–Structure Framework.” Design Studies 25, no. 4 (2004): 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, Gabriela. “The Dialectics of Sketching.” Creativity Research Journal 4, no. 2 (1991): 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelrigg, George A. “A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 120, no. 4 (1998): 653–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillerbrand, Rafaela. “Climate Simulations: Uncertain Projections for an Uncertain World.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 45, no. 1 (2014): 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca, Koray. “The Strong and Weak Senses of Theory-Ladenness of Experimentation: Theory-Driven Versus Exploratory Experiments in the History of High-Energy Particle Physics.” Science in Context 26, no. 1 (2013): 93–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, Tarja. “Isolating Representations vs. Credible Constructions? Economic Modelling in Theory and Practice.” Erkenntnis 70, no. 1 (2009): 59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, Tarja. “Models, Representation, and Mediation.” Philosophy of Science 72, no. 5 (2005): 1260–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Vol. 111. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lithgow, Drew, Cara Morrison, George Pexton, Massimo Panarotto, Jakob R. Müller, Lars Almefelt, and Andrew McLaren. “Design Automation for Customised and Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing: A Case Study on Custom Kayaks.” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1, no. 1 (2019): 699–708.
   Google Scholar
• Mankins, John C. “Technology Readiness Levels.” White Paper, April (1995): 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, Deborah. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Mary S., and Margaret Morrison. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, Gerhard, and Wolfgang Beitz. Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung. Springer, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Pirtle, Zachary. “How the Models of Engineering Tell the Truth.” In Philosophy and Engineering: An Emerging Agenda, edited by I. van de Poel and D. E. Goldberg, 95–108. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Poznic, Michael. “Representation and Similarity: Suárez on Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Scientific Representation.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 47 (2016): 331–347. doi:10.1007/s10838-015-9307-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poznic, Michael. “Modelling Organs with Organs on Chips: Scientific Representation and Engineering Design as Modelling Relations.” Philosophy & Technology 29, no. 4 (2016): 357–371.
   Google Scholar
• Poznic, Michael, Martin Stacey, Rafaela Hillerbrand, and Claudia Eckert. “Designing as Playing Games of Make-Believe.” Design Science 6 (2020): E10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roddeck, Werner. Einführung in die Mechatronik. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Karlheinz. Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen. Vol. 2 of Kataloge. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Abingdon: Routledge, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A., and Glenn Wiggins. “Kinds of Seeing and Their Functions in Designing.” Design Studies 13, no. 2 (1992): 135–156.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, Martin, and Claudia Eckert. “Against Ambiguity.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, no. 2 (2003): 153–183.
   Google Scholar
• Stachowiak, Herbert. Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Wien: Springer, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatis, Diomidis H. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution. New York: ASQ Quality Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, Mauricio. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, no. 3 (2003): 225–244. doi:10.1080/0269859032000169442.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes, Patrick. “Models of Data.” In Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, edited by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, 252–261. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Toon, Adam. Models as Make-Believe: Imagination, Fiction and Scientific Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, Bas. Scientific Representation. Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Vajna, Sandor, Christian Weber, Helmut Bley, and Klaus Zeman. CAX für Ingenieure: Eine Praxisbezogene Einführung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vermaas, Pieter E. “The Flexible Meaning of Function in Engineering.” In Design Society 58-2: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 2, Design Theory and Research Methodology, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.−27.08. 2009, pp. 113-124. Palo Alto: DS, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vertesi, Janet. “Mind the Gap: The London Underground map and Users’ Representations of Urban Space.” Social Studies of Science 38, no. 1 (2008): 7–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, Kendall L. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Michael. “Who is a Modeler?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58, no. 2 (2007): 207–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, David C., and Claudia M. Eckert. “Perspectives on Iteration in Design and Development.” Research in Engineering Design 28, no. 2 (2017): 153–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar