Negotiating boundaries: an intersectional collaboration to advance women academics in engineering

References

• Barker, Lecia, Kathy Garvin-Doxas, and Eric Roberts. “What Can Computer Science Learn from a Fine Arts Approach to Teaching?” Paper Presented at the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, St. Louis, Missouri, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, Julia, and Jeff Nisker. “Tensions Between Anonymity and Thick Description When “Studying up” in Genetics Research.” Qualitative Health Research 25, no. 2 (2015): 276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billies, Michelle, Valerie Francisco, Patricia Krueger, and Darla Linville. “Participatory Action Research: Our Methodological Roots.” International Review of Qualitative Research 3, no. 3 (2010): 277–286.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Heidi. “The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007-2017.” Science & Technology Libraries 36, no. 3 (2017): 235–273. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, Maura. “Discipline-Based Views of Collaboration in Engineering Education Research Partnerships.” 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, Dana M, and Laura Logan. “Gendered Organizations: Progress and Prospects.” Sociology Compass 2, no. 1 (2008): 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Leslie Allison, and Susan Strega. Research as Resistance: Critical, Indigenous and Anti-Oppressive Approaches. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, Coleen, and Michelle Bardini. “Majorism: Neoliberalism in Student Culture.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 52, no. 1 (2021): 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, Erin A. “Ideological Wage Inequalities? The Technical/Social Dualism and the Gender Wage Gap in Engineering.” Social Forces 91, no. 4 (2013): 1147–1182. doi:10.1093/sf/sot024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs 38, no. 4 (2013): 785–810. doi:10.1086/669608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collective, Combahee River. “The Combahee River Collective Statement.” In Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology, edited by Barbara Smith, 264–274, 1983
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 10th anniversary ed. New York: Routlege, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. “Intersectionality's Definitional Dilemmas.” Annual Review of Sociology 41, no. 1 (2015): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory, Vol.1. Duke University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Christianne, and Catherine Hill. Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. Washington, DC: ERIC, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Corneille, Maya, Anna Lee, Sherrice Allen, Jessica Cannady, and Alexia Guess. “Barriers to the Advancement of Women of Color Faculty in STEM.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 38(3) 38, no. 3 (2019): 328–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43, no. 6 (1991): 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Dace, Karen L. Unlikely Allies in the Academy: Women of Color and White Women in Conversation. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Daniell, Ellen. Every Other Thursday: Stories and Strategies from Successful Women Scientists. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0516/2005018885.html.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K. Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. I. Observations from the Field.” Engineering Studies 1, no. 1 (2009): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frickel, Scott, and Neil Gross. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70, no. 2 (2005): 204–232. doi:10.1177/000312240507000202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, Leslie D., Kayon Hall, Amber Benton, Dana Kanhai, and Anne-Marie Núñez. “Comfort Over Change: A Case Study of Diversity and Inclusivity Efforts in U.S. Higher Education.” Innovative Higher Education 21, no. 2 (2021). doi:10.1007/s10755-020-09541-7.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, Sandy. “Red Pedagogy.” In Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies, edited by Norman Denzin, Yvonne Lincoln, and Linda T. Smith, 233–254. Los Angeles: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C., J. Decuir-Gunby, and B. Smith. “Advance Peer Mentoring Summits for Underrepresented Minority Women Engineering Faculty.” 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Grzanka, Patrick R.Intersectionality: A Foundations and Frontiers Reader. New York: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gusterson, Hugh. “Studying up Revisited.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 20, no. 1 (1997): 114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, Ulf. “Being There … and There … and There! Reflections on Multi-Site Ethnography.” Ethnography 4, no. 2 (2003): 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Horner-Devine, M. Claire, Joyce W. Yen, Priti N. Mody-Pan, Cara Margherio, and Samantha Forde. “Beyond Traditional Scientific Training: The Importance of Community and Empowerment for Women in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4 (2016): 119–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isler, J. C., N. V. Berryman, A. Harriot, C. L. Vilfranc, L. J. Carrington, and D. N. Lee. “Defining the Flow—Using an Intersectional Scientific Methodology to Construct a Vanguard STEM Hyperspace.” Genealogy 5, no. 1 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Kellam, Nadia, Vanessa Svihla, and Susannah Davis. “The Power Special Session:Building Awareness of Power and Privilege on Intersectional Teams.” 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Annette, and Ann Marie Wolpe. Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production. New York: Routledge, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Loving, C. J. Loving Leadership: Rekindling the Human Spirit in Business, Relationships, and Life. Ashland: Stellar House Publishing, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. Soyini. Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip052/2004024118.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mansilla, Veronica Boix, Michéle Lamont, and Kyoko Sato. “Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms: Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, no. 4 (2015): 571–612. doi:10.1177/0162243915614103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margherio, C., M. Claire Horner-Devine, Sheri J. Y. Mizumori, and Joyce W. Yen. “Learning to Thrive: Building Diverse Scientists’ Access to Community and Resources Through the Brains Program.” CBE: Life Sciences Education 15, no. 3 (2016): 1–12. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margherio, Cara, M. Claire Horner-Devine, Sheri J. Y. Mizumori, and Joyce W. Yen. “Connecting Counterspaces and Community Cultural Wealth in a Professional Development Program.” Race Ethnicity and Education (2020): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Joseph A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Vol. 41. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• McClaurin, Irma, ed. Black Feminist Anthropology: Theory, Politics, Praxis, and Poetics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, Sharan B. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, Heather, Dorian Russell, and Catherine Hill. “Broadening the Science of Broadening Participation in STEM Through Critical Mixed Methodologies and Intersectionality Frameworks.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 5 (2018): 580–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, Giles. “Not So Distant, Not So Strange: The Personal and the Political in Participatory Research.” Ethics, Place & Environment 2, no. 1 (1999): 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi, Bonnie, and Patrick R Grzanka. “Using Intersectionality Responsibly: Toward Critical Epistemology, Structural Analysis, and Social Justice Activism.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 64, no. 5 (2017): 500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Maria, Nuria Jaumot-Pascual, and Lily T. Ko. “Research Literature on Women of Color in Undergraduate Engineering Education: A Systematic Thematic Synthesis.” Journal of Engineering Education 109 (2020): 581–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Maria, Lanet M. Smith, and Lily T. Ko. “Counterspaces for Women of Color in Stem Higher Education: Marginal and Central Spaces for Persistence and Success.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55, no. 2 (2018): 206–245. doi:10.1002/tea.21417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Maria, Carol Wright, Lorelle Espinoza, and Gary Orfield. “Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.” Harvard Educational Review 81, no. 2 (2011): 172–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, John N., and Edward J. Hackett. “Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements.” American Sociological Review 77, no. 1 (2012): 21–44. doi:10.1177/0003122411433763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawley, Alice L. “Learning from Small Numbers” of Underrepresented Students’ Stories: Discussing a Method to Learn About Institutional Structure through Narrative.” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41, no. 1 (2011): 85–106. doi:10.1177/030631271038030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, and Margaret M. Lock. “The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1, no. 1 (1987): 6–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/648769.
   Google Scholar
• Slaton, Amy E., and Alice L. Pawley. “The Power and Politics of Engineering Education Research Design: Saving the ‘Small N’.” Engineering Studies 10, no. 2-3 (2018): 133–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, James P. The Ethnographic Interview. 2016 ed. Ann Arbor: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, James P. Participant Observation. 2016 ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., and C. Leggon. “African American Women in Engineering: Intersectionality as a Pathway to Social Justice.” In Social Justice and Education in the 21st Century: Research from South Africa and the United States, edited by Vijay Reddy, and Willie Pearson Jr., 412. New York: Springer Nature, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. From# Blacklivesmatter to Black Liberation. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Toyosaki, Satoshi, Sandra L Pensoneau-Conway, Nathan A Wendt, and Kyle Leathers. “Community Autoethnography: Compiling the Personal and Resituating Whiteness.” Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies 9, no. 1 (2009): 56–83.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, Joyce, Cara Margherio, Coleen Carrigan, Julie Ivy, Claire Horner-Devine, and Eve Riskin. “Diversity and Inclusion Begin with Trust: To Address Racism, Engineering Educators must Forge Relationships and Collaborations.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Prism Magazine, November 2020.
   Google Scholar