References
- Blake, M., Majewicz, K., Tickner, A., & Lam, J. (2017). Usability analysis of the Big Ten Academic Alliance Geoportal: Findings and recommendations for improvement of the user experience. Code4Lib Journal, (38). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/12932/.
- Bui, Y., & Park, J. R. (2006). An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the National Science Digital Library metadata repository. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI. Retrieved from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/ojs/index.php/cais/article/viewFile/524/168/.
- Bruce, T. R., & Hillmann, D. I. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In D. I. Hillmann & E. L. Westbrooks (Eds.), Metadata in practice. Chicago: ALA Editions. (pp. 238–256).
- Dangerfield, M. C. (2015). Report and Recommendations from the Task Force on Metadata Quality. Retrieved from https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Europeana_Network/metadata-quality-report.pdf.
- Dunn, A., Critchlow, M., & Rissmeyer, C. (2017). “Using Git for Metadata – Part 1.” Samvera Connect 2017 workshop. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-4MBBZkSmYGseGsvh1fY2N9I9zNTCvpbBL2oE9HeeM4/edit?usp=sharing
- Europeana Data Model Primer. (2013). Retrieved from http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Primer_130714.pdf/.
- Federal Geographic Data Committee. (1998). Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata. (FGDC-STD-001-1998). Retrieved from https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/metadata/base-metadata/v2_0698.pdf
- Florance, P., McGee, M., Barnett, C., & McDonald, S. (2015). The OpenGeoportal Federation. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 11(3), 376–394. doi:10.1080/15420353.2015.1054543
- GeoBlacklight Schema. (2017). Retrieved from https://github.com/geoblacklight/geoblacklight/blob/master/schema/geoblacklight-schema.md/.
- Hardy, D., & Durante, K. (2014). A metadata schema for geospatial resource discovery use cases. Code4Lib Journal, (25). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/9710/.
- Hardy, D., & Durante, K. (2015). Discovery, management, and preservation of geospatial data using Hydra. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 11(2), 123–154. doi:10.1080/15420353.2015.1041630
- Hardy, D., Reed, J., & Sadler, B. (2016). Geospatial resource discovery. In K. Varnum (Ed.), Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to your Library's Licensed and Digitized Content (pp. 47–62). Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
- Harper, C. A. (2016). Metadata analytics, visualization, and optimization: Experiments in statistical analysis of the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA). Code4Lib Journal, (33). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11752/.
- Hillmann, D. I. (2008). Metadata quality: From evaluation to augmentation. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 46(1), 65–80. doi:10.1080/01639370802183008
- International Rights Statements Working Group. (2016). Recommendations for Standardized International Rights Statements [White Paper]. Retrieved from http://rightsstatements.org/files/180108recommendations_for_standardized_international_rights_statements_v1.2.1.pdf.
- International Standards Organization (2007). ISO/TS 19139:2007 Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema implementation. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/32557.html
- Kapidakis, S. (2012). Comparing metadata quality in the Europeana context. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. (p. 25). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2413097.2413129.
- Matienzo, M. A., & Rudersdorf, A. (2014). The Digital Public Library of America ingestion ecosystem: Lessons learned after one year of large-scale collaborative metadata aggregation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 16. arXiv:1408.1713.
- Mernik, M., Heering, J., & Sloane, A. M. (2005). When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(4), 316–344. Retrieved from. doi:10.1145/1118890.1118892
- Metadata Application Profile. (2017). Digital Public Library of America. Retrieved from https://dp.la/info/developers/map/.
- Moen, W. E., Stewart, E. L., & McClure, C. R. (1997). The Role of Content Analysis in Evaluating Metadata for the US Government Information Locator Service (GILS): Results from an exploratory study. Retrieved from http://www.unt.edu/wmoen/publications/GILSMDContentAnalysis.htm/.
- OpenGeoMetadata. (2017). Retrieved from https://github.com/OpenGeoMetadata
- OpenGeoPortal Metadata: Best Practices Guide. (2015). OpenGeoPortal. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IeFjKMqXYhNwG6q8DiG7f3EthPpAo_KTOQM52obLH04/.
- Park, J. R. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3-4), 213–228. doi:10.1080/01639370902737240
- Poore, B. S., & Wolf, E. B. (2013). Metadata squared: Enhancing its usability for volunteered geographic information and the GeoWeb. In: D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. (pp. 43–64). New York: Springer.
- Renteria-Agualimpia, W., Lopez-Pellicer, F. J., Lacasta, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F. J., & Muro-Medrano, P. R. (2016). Improving the geospatial consistency of digital libraries metadata. Journal of Information Science, 42(4), 507–523. doi:10.1177/0165551515597364
- Schaffner, J. (2009). The metadata is the interface: Better description for better discovery of archives and special collections, synthesized from user studies. OCLC. Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-06.pdf/.
- Stein, A., Applegate, K. J., & Robbins, S. (2017). Achieving and Maintaining Metadata Quality: Toward a Sustainable Workflow for the IDEALS Institutional Repository. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(7-8), 644–666. doi:10.1080/01639374.2017.1358786
- Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B., & Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1720–1733.