Common Metadata Framework for Research Data Repository: Necessity to Support Open Science

References

• Alisa, S., & Kevin, R. (2015). Research data management. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(3), 154–156. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assante, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., & Tani, A. (2016). Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing? Data Science Journal, 15,1–24. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2016-006
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. L. (2008). Data, disciplines, and scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing, 21(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X254476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. L., Darch, P. T., Sands, A. E., Pasquetto, I. V., Golshan, M. S., Wallis, J. C., & Traweek, S. (2015). Knowledge infrastructures in science: Data, diversity, and digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 16(3–4), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0157-z
   Google Scholar
• Chao, T. C. (2015). Mapping methods metadata for research data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.347
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A., Simperl, E., Koesten, L., Konstantinidis, G., Ibáñez, L.-D., Kacprzak, E., & Groth, P. (2020). Dataset search: A survey. The VLDB Journal, 29(1), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-019-00564-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dora, M., & Kumar, H. A. (2015). Managing research data in academic institutions: Role of libraries. 10th International CALIBER-2015 (pp. 484–495). https://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/1944/1889
   Google Scholar
• Doucette, L., & Fyfe, B. (2013). Drowning in research data: Addressing data management literacy of graduate students. ACRL (pp. 165–171). https://1library.net/document/qo1mwvkz-drowning-research-data-addressing-management-literacy-graduate-students.html
   Google Scholar
• Ekeh, D. O., Mrs, C. C. O., Eze, C. N., Ani, M. I., Igu, O. F., Mrs, C. M. O., & Duru, C. K. (2023). The role of academic libraries in research data management in tertiary institutions. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Farnel, S., & Shiri, A. (2014). Metadata for research data: Current practices and trends. In Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (pp. 74–82). Retrieved from https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3714
   Google Scholar
• Foulonneau, M., Cole, T. W., Habing, T. G., & Shreeves, S. L. (2005). Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 32–41). https://doi.org/10.1145/1065385.1065393
   Google Scholar
• Grunzke, R., Hartmann, V., Jejkal, T., Kollai, H., Prabhune, A., Herold, H., Deicke, A., Dressler, C., Dolhoff, J., Stanek, J., Hoffmann, A., Müller-Pfefferkorn, R., Schrade, T., Meinel, G., Herres-Pawlis, S., & Nagel, W. E. (2019). The MASi repository service—Comprehensive, metadata-driven and multi-community research data management. Future Generation Computer Systems, 94, 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, K., & Dahlgren, A. (2022). Open research data repositories: Practices, norms, and metadata for sharing images. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(2), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. M. (2001). Metadata made simpler: A guide for libraries. NISO Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linkert, M., Rueden, C. T., Allan, C., Burel, J.-M., Moore, W., Patterson, A., Loranger, B., Moore, J., Neves, C., MacDonald, D., Tarkowska, A., Sticco, C., Hill, E., Rossner, M., Eliceiri, K. W., & Swedlow, J. R. (2010). Metadata matters: Access to image data in the real world. The Journal of Cell Biology, 189(5), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löffler, F., Wesp, V., König-Ries, B., & Klan, F. (2021). Dataset search in biodiversity research: Do metadata in data repositories reflect scholarly information needs? PLOS One, 16(3), e0246099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayernik, M. S. (2016). Research data and metadata curation as institutional issues. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayernik, M. S. (2019). Metadata accounts: Achieving data and evidence in scientific research. Social Studies of Science, 49(5), 732–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719863494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampel, H., Vierkant, P., Scholze, F., Bertelmann, R., Kindling, M., Klump, J., Goebelbecker, H.-J., Gundlach, J., Schirmbacher, P., & Dierolf, U. (2013). Making research data repositories visible: The re3data.org registry. PLOS One, 8(11), e78080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, L., Green, A., & Stephenson, E. (2014). Committing to data quality review. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.317
   Google Scholar
• Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J. I. (2017). Zenodo in the spotlight of traditional and new metrics. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pomerantz, J. (2015). Metadata. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramkumar, P., & Kannan (2018). Initiatives of research data literacy for data management in libraries. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 7(1), 128–131. http://www.jalis.in
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. (2017). Understanding metadata. National Information Standards Organization (Vol. 23, pp. 7–10). http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rücknagel, J., Vierkant, P., Ulrich, R., Kloska, G., Schnepf, E., Fichtmüller, D., Reuter, E., Semrau, A., Kindling, M., Pampel, H., Witt, M., Fritze, F., Van De Sandt, S., Klump, J., Goebelbecker, H.-J., Skarupianski, M., Bertelmann, R., Schirmbacher, P., Scholze, F., … Kirchhoff, A. (2015). Metadata schema for the description of research data repositories (3.0). Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ. https://doi.org/10.2312/RE3.008
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. (2016). Research data sharing and reuse practices of academic faculty researchers: A study of the Virginia tech data landscape. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.359
   Google Scholar
• Trisovic, A., Mika, K., Boyd, C., Feger, S., & Crosas, M. (2021). Repository approaches to improving the quality of shared data and code. Data, 6(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6020015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, H., Kock-Schoppenhauer, A.-K., Deppenwiese, N., Gött, R., Kern, J., Lablans, M., Majeed, R. W., Stöhr, M. R., Stausberg, J., Varghese, J., Dugas, M., & Ingenerf, J. (2022). Understanding the nature of metadata: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e25440. https://doi.org/10.2196/25440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, H., Bainbridge, D., & Nichols, M. (2008). How to build a digital library (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123748577/how-to-build-a-digital-library
   Google Scholar
• Zavalina, O. L., Palmer, C. L., Jackson, A. S., & Han, M. J. (2009). Evaluating descriptive richness in collection-level metadata. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(4), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386380802627109
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, A. (2007). Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1–2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8
   Google Scholar