Changes in Digital Collections and Their Metadata: A Longitudinal Study of UIUC Digital Library

References

• Arms, W. Y. (2000). Digital libraries. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, R. E., Bolding, K., Butler, D., Cobourn, A., Dietz, B., Farrell, J., Helms, A., Henke, K., Macquarie, C., Peltzman, S., Watson, C. T., Taylor, A., Venlet, J., & Walker, P. (2020, February). Levels of born-digital access, version 1. Digital Library Federation (DLF) Born-Digital Access Working Group. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R5F78
   Google Scholar
• Berdini, A., Macquire, C., Peltzman, S., & Tasker, K. (2017). UC guidelines for born-digital archival description. University of California Statewide System Libraries. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9cg222jc
   Google Scholar
• Berdini, A., Macquire, C., Peltzman, S., & Tasker, K. (2018). Describing digital: The design and creation of a born-digital archival description standard at the University of California Libraries. Journal of Western Archives, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.26077/e90b-2e7b
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, T. R., & Hillmann, D. I. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In E. L. Westbrooks & D. I. Hillmann (Eds.), Metadata in practice (pp. 238–256). ALA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, K. (2014). Exploring digital libraries: Foundations, practice, prospects. Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DCMI Usage Board (2020). DCMI metadata terms. Dublin Core. https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/
   Google Scholar
• DLF & CERN (2001). Open meeting. Renaissance Hotel. Retrieved January 23, 2001, from https://www.openarchives.org/meetings/DC2001/OpenMeeting.html
   Google Scholar
• Elo, K. (2020). Big data, bad metadata: A methodological note on the importance of good metadata in the age of digital history. In M. Fridlund, M. Oiva, & P. Paju (Eds.), Digital histories: Emergent approaches within the new digital history (pp. 103–112). Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gradmann, S. (2010). Digital library metadata. In M. Collier (Ed.), Business planning for digital libraries: International approaches (pp. 157–164). Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qdz2g.17
   Google Scholar
• Han, M., Cho, C., Cole, T. W., & Jackson, A. S. (2009). Metadata for special collections in CONTENTdm: How to improve interoperability of unique fields through OAI-PMH. Journal of Library Metadata, 9(3–4), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386380903405124
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. S., Han, M. K., Groetsch, K., Mustafoff, M., & Cole, T. W. (2008). Dublin Core metadata harvested through OAI-PMH. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J517v08n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Jaillant, L., & Caputo, A. (2022). Unlocking digital archives: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on AI and born-digital data. AI & Society, 37(3), 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01367-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, J. (2016). Describing the digital: The archival cataloguing of born-digital personal papers. Archives and Records, 37(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2016.1139494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licklider, J. C. R. (1965). Libraries of the future. Council on Library Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, S. L., Pearson, M. N., & Stratton, T. (2023). Metadata best practices for digital collections: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. University Library, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. https://guides.library.illinois.edu/DigitizationMetadata/DLSBestPractices
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. J. (2022). Metadata for digital collections (2nd ed.). ALA Neal Schuman.
   Google Scholar
• Mischo, W. (2004). United States Federal Support for digital library research and its implications for digital library development. In Digital libraries: Policy, planning, and practice (pp. 5–18). Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morehaert, P. (2016, August 8). The future is digital: IFLA program stresses protecting and collecting digital data. American Libraries. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/blogs/the-scoop/the-future-is-digital/
   Google Scholar
• NISO Framework Working Group (2007). A framework for building good digital collections (3rd ed.). National Information Standards Organization (NISO).
   Google Scholar
• OCLC (2023). Best practices for creating shareable metadata. https://help.oclc.org/Metadata_Services/CONTENTdm/Get_started/best_practices
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, C. (2013, April 3). The end of the beginning: A born digital survey at the Smithsonian Institution. Smithsonian Institution Archives. https://siarchives.si.edu/blog/end-beginning-born-digital-survey-smithsonian-institution
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3–4), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. (2004). Understanding metadata: What is metadata, and what is it for? National Information Standards Organization. http://groups.niso.org/higherlogic/ws/public/download/17446/Understanding%20Metadata.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rimkus, K. R., Anderson, B. G., Germeck, K. E., Nielsen, C. C., Prom, C. J., & Popp, T. (2020). Preservation and access for born-digital electronic records: The case for an Institutional Digital Content Format Registry. The American Archivist, 83(2), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-83.2.397
   Google Scholar
• Rimkus, K., & Habing, T. (2013). Medusa at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: A digital preservation service based on PREMIS. In JCDL 2013. Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 49–52). https://doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467725
   Google Scholar
• Shreeves, S. L., Knutson, E. M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C. L., Twidale, M. B., & Cole, T. W. (2005). Is “quality” metadata, “shareable” metadata? The implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries (pp. 223–237).
   Google Scholar
• Shreeves, S. L., Riley, J., & Milewicz, L. (2006, August). Moving towards shareable metadata. First Monday, 11(8–7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i8.1386
   Google Scholar
• Shreeves, S., Riley, J., & Hagedorn, K. (2007). Best practices for OAI PMH data provider implementations and shareable metadata. Digital Library Federation. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/50369
   Google Scholar
• Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B., Shreeves, S. L., & Cole, T. W. (2004). Metadata quality for federated collections. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 111–125).
   Google Scholar
• Tani, A., Candela, L., & Castelli, D. (2013). Dealing with metadata quality: The legacy of digital library efforts. Information Processing & Management, 49(6), 1194–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar